header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: #4 Michigan (7-0, 9-1) at rutger (0-7, 1-9) Post Game

 (Read 7506 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37520
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2018, 10:56:57 AM »
that post sounds like an Alabama fan
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MichiFan87

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 796
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2018, 12:24:29 PM »
I know it was meant in jest, but of course, with travel roster limits, you can't really bring the walkons and players that are redshirting to play (with the new 4 game rule, this becomes a possibility for home games), which of course is the only reason the primary backups played until the end of the game two years ago.
“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing”
― Bo Schembechler

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20318
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2018, 01:06:43 PM »
I know it was meant in jest, but of course, with travel roster limits, you can't really bring the walkons and players that are redshirting to play (with the new 4 game rule, this becomes a possibility for home games), which of course is the only reason the primary backups played until the end of the game two years ago.
I don't think it's the ONLY reason

MichiFan87

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 796
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2018, 01:53:42 PM »
I don't think it's the ONLY reason
I mean, who else could've played at the end of the game? Granted, they ran up the score with the backups by still playing aggressively if that's what you're getting at, since Michigan was still undefeated at the time and was playing just as well as Ohio State, so they had a real chance to win the conference and go to the playoff if not for Speight getting hurt in Iowa City.
Granted, in looking at the box score, the backups probably get less snaps than I remember: http://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=400869636
Hopefully this time around, they'll take the starters out earlier, though.
“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing”
― Bo Schembechler

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2018, 02:08:35 PM »
Insiders are beginning to report that Shea will put his name in for the draft but is nearly 100% planning to return next year. That's huge and makes sense all around. He'd probably be ~8th taken at his position, which would make him a 2019 midrounder, and I'd say he could parlay a return into a 1st/2nd Rd selection if he stays and he doesn't dip below his current level of play.

And then there's the offense, which will return almost everyone - only losing one OL (JBB), Higdon and Perry. So: Patterson, in his final year of eligibility, throwing to Collins/Black/DPJ and Gentry, behind an ascending OL? Yes please!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37520
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2018, 02:10:29 PM »
He'd probably be ~8th taken at his position, which would make him a 2019 midrounder,
unless he has a great game vs tOSU, Northwestern in Indy, and a couple more big games in the CFP.
then he's a top 5 pick overall
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Temp430

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2018, 02:13:53 PM »
Insiders are beginning to report that Shea will put his name in for the draft but is nearly 100% planning to return next year. That's huge and makes sense all around. He'd probably be ~8th taken at his position, which would make him a 2019 midrounder, and I'd say he could parlay a return into a 1st/2nd Rd selection if he stays and he doesn't dip below his current level of play.

And then there's the offense, which will return almost everyone - only losing one OL (JBB), Higdon and Perry. So: Patterson, in his final year of eligibility, throwing to Collins/Black/DPJ and Gentry, behind an ascending OL? Yes please!
Great news.  I guess Shea is having fun and likes Ann Arbor.  Already looking forward to spanking the Nitts again in Happy Valley next October.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2018, 02:24:23 PM by Temp430 »
A decade of Victory over Penn State.

All in since 1969

Reyd

  • Walk On
  • *
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 48
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2018, 02:49:17 PM »
It was reaction to the spread line. I'm sure that's more insulting to Rutger's football than any jest I made because of the spread line.

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2018, 02:50:28 PM »
My thought exactly. And what a place for fun. Good for him.

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #23 on: November 06, 2018, 02:52:37 PM »
It was reaction to the spread line. I'm sure that's more insulting to Rutger's football than any jest I made because of the spread line.
I believe the most lopsided away game spread in Vegas history was 38.5 (can't confirm but have read it twice this week), which I guess would make 39.5 historic if it holds.
Honestly, though, I'm cool without covering if it helps us bubblewrap Shea.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14340
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #24 on: November 06, 2018, 03:10:08 PM »
I believe the most lopsided away game spread in Vegas history was 38.5 (can't confirm but have read it twice this week), which I guess would make 39.5 historic if it holds.
Honestly, though, I'm cool without covering if it helps us bubblewrap Shea.
I don't want them to rest Shea all game. Don't want him to get rusty, have to keep him sharp. But I would like to think they'd want to build an early lead and treat it almost like an NFL pre-season game. Give him a few series, get a lead, then let Peters play basically the entire 2nd, 3rd, and 4th QTRs. Time to get Peters some reps and get him up to speed fast. It's Rutgers man.

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #25 on: November 06, 2018, 04:40:43 PM »
Was rewatching earlier and noticed Aubrey Solomon limp to the locker room in the first half. Any word on the severity there?

Hope it was precautionary but I always worry about these guys' knees. Plus: This defense has been even better since his return.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14340
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #26 on: November 06, 2018, 04:53:46 PM »
Was rewatching earlier and noticed Aubrey Solomon limp to the locker room in the first half. Any word on the severity there?

Hope it was precautionary but I always worry about these guys' knees. Plus: This defense has been even better since his return.
pretty sure he came back to the game in the 2nd half.
Regardless we won't know one way or the other because Harbaugh treats injury information like nuclear launch codes.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20318
  • Liked:
Re: #4 Michigan (8-1, 6-0) at rutger (1-8, 0-6)
« Reply #27 on: November 07, 2018, 08:32:51 AM »
I mean, who else could've played at the end of the game? Granted, they ran up the score with the backups by still playing aggressively if that's what you're getting at, since Michigan was still undefeated at the time and was playing just as well as Ohio State, so they had a real chance to win the conference and go to the playoff if not for Speight getting hurt in Iowa City.
Granted, in looking at the box score, the backups probably get less snaps than I remember: http://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=400869636
Hopefully this time around, they'll take the starters out earlier, though.
That was when Rutgers was trying to poke the bear still.  And the bear smacked them across the face.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.