And it's still yet to be determined legally if Stallions paid 3rd parties to record future opposition sidelines if that is actually clearly covered in the rules and violated them. I would agree if Stallions was on the CMU sidelines, that's cut and dry, but it's still not 100% confirmed that was him either. I think it's likely, but no confirmation it was him.
So yeah, when you scream cheater over and over, yet it's not actually determined that Stallions system actually broke the rules or it's in the gray area, people want to dig in and fight back. It's not deflection, it's simply not accepting that's it's clear as day as some vested interested media sources and rival fans are claiming. So you're bullet points aren't being argued, but what is is proof the actions are considered cheating according to the rule book.
Secondly, do you believe third parties videoing on their phones is worse that coaching staff of other schools, who are far more educated on the game, capturing all the signs and sharing them with other staffs in the conference? If Michigan staff called up Georgia last and gave them all the OSU signs, would you think that's less impactful than Georgia assistant bought a ticket for a kid to sit in the stands of the osu v michigan game to record the OSU coaches with his cell phone and ship it back to them?
First of all- the majority of screaming “ cheater” is coming from the Michigan posters here, including you now. Think about that for a minute. The University of Michigan football program is undercurrent investigation, and about to be officially under a second investigation, by the NCAA .
Please don’t be angry with everyone else because of that. Please don’t be angry with the fact that a former, now terminated employee of the University of Michigan is under FBI investigation for computer crimes. But here you guys said calling everybody else cheaters. Ok.
You ask what evidence I have that those listed items that you and nobody disagrees with our violations. Although I’d like to say” are you fucking kidding me,” I’ll just say look at my paragraph above. And ask yourself is the NCAA investigating because this could be a great area or are they already convinced that rules were broken?
Now you’re saying it might be a gray area. In other words, if there is a law and you commit a crime, do you have an out if you actually send somebody else to commit the crime in your place. I know you don’t believe that for one second you are better than that.
Your last question is easy. Sign stealing is legal on the field between two teams were playing each other at the time they are playing each other. Everybody knows this. Think about why that is? The answer is obvious. It’s because it’s very ineffective and knowledge gained on a good day is marginal.
If you go to a game, you’re not playing in and record the signs and the place that go with them. You now have an ability to spend endless hours, deciphering the information and figuring out very specifically what the play calls and signals are and who the hot signaler is.
If Rutgers, or Purdue or Ohio State went to a game and filmed Michigan’s signs, or if they film them during their own games, and then deciphered them and pass them to a future Michigan opponent- that would be heinous and an obvious violation of the rules. It would be doing exactly what Michigan is accused of doing. Just like stallions having Tennessee filmed and sending that film to South Carolina, which is what the guy who admits to filming for Stalions also admits that he did.
F, Ohio, State, Bourbon, Purdue, or Rutgers, or any other team, just shared what they were able to pick up during the game, which is completely legal, and pass it to a future Michigan opponent, not only is that not illegal. Based onwhat has been presented, but also is known to be very common place. In other words, it is a big nothing burger, on a good day, and probably with an empty bun.
