header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Big Ten Hockey thread

 (Read 11553 times)

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 24618
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Hockey thread
« Reply #56 on: Today at 01:05:36 PM »
NCAA hockey was very top heavy for a long time, and had sort of expanded over the past 15ish years.  I wonder if NIL has sort of reconsolidated that power.

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2745
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Hockey thread
« Reply #57 on: Today at 01:15:39 PM »
True, but much less so in this century. Of all of those titles, Michigan's last was 1998, Wisconsin's only one this century was 2006, and North Dakota has two, 2000 and 2016.

Denver, on the other hand, has had five this century, allowing it to pass Michigan for the most. Denver's first five were between '58 and '69. Michigan, like in football, has mostly very old championships: 7 from '48 to '64, then two in the 90s: '96 and '98.

Michigan is the overall 1-seed this year. Odds are a Michigan/NoDak final.

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2745
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Hockey thread
« Reply #58 on: Today at 01:17:58 PM »
I wonder if NIL has sort of reconsolidated that power.
Good question. I would expect Minnesota and the Boston schools to benefit from that. I think I read that this was a very rare NCAA tournament that didn't include a team from the Beanpot, Boston's annual college hockey showcase between Boston College, Boston University, Northeastern, and Harvard (!!).

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 24618
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Hockey thread
« Reply #59 on: Today at 01:21:14 PM »
True, but much less so in this century. Of all of those titles, Michigan's last was 1998, Wisconsin's only one this century was 2006, and North Dakota has two, 2000 and 2016.

Denver, on the other hand, has had five this century, allowing it to pass Michigan for the most. Denver's first five were between '58 and '69. Michigan, like in football, has mostly very old championships: 7 from '48 to '64, then two in the 90s: '96 and '98.

Michigan is the overall 1-seed this year. Odds are a Michigan/NoDak final.
Yeah, that's what I mean, those traditional powers hadn't done as well lately.  But does this help them regain their foothold against the teams like Ferris State, Union, Providence, Quinnipiac, Duluth, St. Cloud State, Minnesota State, Miami(Ohio), all of whom appeared in a national title game since 2009

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2745
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Hockey thread
« Reply #60 on: Today at 01:26:21 PM »
Yeah, I was just looking at that. Basically, when UM-Duluth won in 2011, that marks the changing of the guard at the top, with the traditional elites capturing a smaller percentage of the titles (Boston College 2012, North Dakota 2016, and Denver 2017, 2022, 2024), and a whole bunch of smaller schools winning, including UM-D three times, Yale, Union, Providence, UMass, Quinnipiac, and Western Michigan. UM-D's win in 2011 was its first; no longer the "Gopher Rejects" that we used to yell at them in the Dane County Coliseum and the Kohl Center.

Starting with UM-D in 2011, seven schools won their first NCAA championship since 2011, and of those seven, UM-D is the only one with more than one.
« Last Edit: Today at 01:47:10 PM by SFBadger96 »

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.