Rutgers has what has to be one of the strangest NCAA Tournament profiles I've ever seen. They are LOADED in quality wins. All of a sudden they have (tentatively right now) SIX Q1 wins. They have gained four in the last two weeks because their wins vsMSU, vstOSU, and @UW were all Q1 plus their previous home win over Michigan became a Q1 win when Michigan's demolition of Purdue moved Michigan up to #30. Thus, Rutgers is an insanely good 6-3 in Q1 games. For comparison, here are the top teams in the country:
- Gonzaga is 5-2
- Zona is 6-2
- Houston is 2-3
- Kentucky is 5-4
- NOVA is 5-5
- Baylor is 8-3
- Kansas is 7-3
- Auburn is 7-2
- Purdue is 8-3
- Tennessee is 4-6
Rutgers' 6-3 in Q1 games is comparable to pretty much any of the best teams in the nation and decidedly better than some of the top-10.
That is the good news. Now for the problem:
Those ten teams listed above have a grand combined total of just:
- Four Q2 losses
- ZERO Q3 losses
- Zero Q4 losses
Rutgers, on the other hand, has:
- Three Q2 losses (1-3)
- Two Q3 losses (2-2)
- One Q4 loss (6-1)
So if you look at Rutgers' games against quality opponents they are not just a Tournament team but a high seed. Conversely, if you look at their games against bad opponents they are not just NOT a Tournament team, they aren't even remotely close.