header pic

The SEC Forum at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: SEC Front Porch

 (Read 252267 times)

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5482
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1260 on: November 26, 2025, 10:05:25 AM »
I'd think the OU QB was told by his coach not to just kneel the ball. Even if everyone knew what you were doing, it's humiliating to have the other team just give it up. Running an A gap dive and falling over on contact sells it better.

That could be, but then that begs the question, why did he kneel it on first down?  It'd be highly irregular for a QB to call that on his own, without getting instructions from the sidelines.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87899
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1261 on: November 26, 2025, 10:58:38 AM »
I am reminded of coaching soccer, U14, we had a very good team at the rec level, basically mostly good players who could play select or HS but just wanted to have fun.  We played another team that had maybe one or two guys who had even played soccer, they were from a disadvantaged area, I thought it great they were doing this, but they were woefully overmatched.  At 3-0 I was trying to get my 2-3 not good players up front to get a goal for them.  My goalies had lay down on the field, I told him to get up.

At 6-0, I told the team to kick the ball to the other team without looking too obvious.    My goal then was to let them score, somehow, but we never managed it, even trying out best.

I'd guess in the above case, it was before helmet radios, and the kneel down play was something done ad hoc, maybe even the coach signalled it in, and then changed his mind.  Usually in football you can sub in your scout teamers and let them play and it would be close to even.

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5482
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1262 on: November 26, 2025, 10:59:18 AM »
Mike: I inadvertently responded to your analysis of the 2003 A&M @ OU game. I'll repost my response here.

The offense probably was vanilla, as you noted. The defense was maybe the best of the Stoops era. I suspect that all the praise went to the heads of some of the players and coaches. I think Nick Saban has a term for that. Other than that, I really can't explain what happened in the CCG vs. K-State. The team just got whipped by Bill Snyder & Co.

In the Sugar Bowl vs. LSU, I think one or more of three factors played a role in OU's less-than-optimum performance: (1) Jason White got banged up in the CCG. Specifically, he got his foot stepped on and he was unable to plant it properly when passing for the NCG. (2) Whether by accident or design, LSU coaches were in the building at the practice field and the OU coaches were not aware of it. Coincidentally, OU had installed a trick play--a fake punt, IIRC--and LSU saw it coming when it was tried early in the game. (3) LSU was really good, and Saban may have had his team better prepared for the game than Stoops did.

Those OU and LSU defenses were outstanding, for 2003.  I've often wondered how they would fare in today's game.  Since then, the HUNH became commonplace, spread-option attacks became a thing, mobile QBs seem to have become a lot more common, and QBs in general are just.....better.....than the average QB teams seemed to face back then.  It used to just take some good pressure to make a QB wilt and throw off target.  These days it seems like there 10-12 guys in any given year who are just ballers and rise to the challenge of putting them under pressure.  

I know in LSU's case, all of the D-linemen had NFL careers, and most of the secondary too.  The linebackers were good college LBs, but not NFL talent guys.  I'm not enough of an NFL aficionado to be sure about all the names from OU, but I know Dvoracek, Harris, and Lehman from the front 7 all played in the NFL.  So I imagine the talent was there.  But in looking back over the schedule from those days, I don't think we ran into any nuclear offenses.  And the type of looks those defenses gave.....would Saban/Muschamp and Mike Stoops have been able to come up with something to thwart modern offenses, back then?  Don't know about that.  

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5482
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1263 on: November 26, 2025, 11:04:17 AM »
I'd guess in the above case, it was before helmet radios, and the kneel down play was something done ad hoc, maybe even the coach signalled it in, and then changed his mind.  Usually in football you can sub in your scout teamers and let them play and it would be close to even.

That would make sense.

In this particular case, the sequence remains odd to me because OU already had its backup QB and OL in.  They didn't really have backup RBs, because only two of them were available for the game that day.  On first down they kneel it (the announcers talk about what a classy move it is), then they run it on 2nd, 3rd, and 4th down.  And, imo, they run it reeeeaallly lazy, with lackluster effort.  If they're trying to be incognito about their charity, they weren't doing a good job.  Might as well have just knelt it, for the effort the backs gave.  And to boot, A&M was still going hard.  They smacked the hell out of the line and the backs on those plays, which made me think how unsafe it is to go half-speed when other guys are trying to kill you at full speed.  Just not a good move.  

Either kneel the ball, or run it down their throats one more time and score, scoreboard be damned.  The flip-flop combined with the half-assing combined with the brutal hits the ball carriers took was just.....weird.  

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6521
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1264 on: November 26, 2025, 11:07:47 AM »
Those OU and LSU defenses were outstanding, for 2003.  I've often wondered how they would fare in today's game.  Since then, the HUNH became commonplace, spread-option attacks became a thing, mobile QBs seem to have become a lot more common, and QBs in general are just.....better.....than the average QB teams seemed to face back then.  It used to just take some good pressure to make a QB wilt and throw off target.  These days it seems like there 10-12 guys in any given year who are just ballers and rise to the challenge of putting them under pressure. 

I know in LSU's case, all of the D-linemen had NFL careers, and most of the secondary too.  The linebackers were good college LBs, but not NFL talent guys.  I'm not enough of an NFL aficionado to be sure about all the names from OU, but I know Dvoracek, Harris, and Lehman from the front 7 all played in the NFL.  So I imagine the talent was there.  But in looking back over the schedule from those days, I don't think we ran into any nuclear offenses.  And the type of looks those defenses gave.....would Saban/Muschamp and Mike Stoops have been able to come up with something to thwart modern offenses, back then?  Don't know about that.

It's always tough to compare teams and players across the decades. Would Babe Ruth hit 714 dingers if he played today? Would Ty Cobb have stolen 892 bases if he played today?

Sorry, baseball does not equal football. So, would Bart Starr be leading the '66 Packers into Super Bowl LX?
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87899
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1265 on: November 26, 2025, 11:31:29 AM »
I was playing volleyball with several current UGA football players, nice fellows, good athletes, not I remember the TE was shorter than I am, well built, but not a monster.  The starting LB was on the team also, good athlete, but maybe 210 pounds.  The OLs back then probably averaged 220-230.

And yeah, in baseball, in ca. 1935, you didn't have the super elite at every position who worked out year round with coaches.  You had guys who had jobs in the off season.

This was true in 1960 as well.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23426
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1266 on: November 26, 2025, 12:18:27 PM »
Babe Ruth wouldn't have made the majors today.  Not because of a lack of ability/production, but he'd have been kicked out due to behavior.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87899
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1267 on: November 26, 2025, 12:53:42 PM »
He might have made the majors and then been suspended or banned.  It's very hard to assess the greats in baseball of the past versus today, I think.

I was talking with one major leaguer a while back, Marvin Freeman.  He told me he worked out the entire off season with a personal trainer and still got sore when spring training started.  He said it was standing around that did it.  I'm sure he was typical for his era, 1986-1996 (and today).  He thought ST should be about half as long.  I'm sure in 1950 people showed up out of shape, probably many drank too much, got fat and lazy, worked in a hardware store etc.

So, the Babe was hitting off pitchers who had thrown maybe 130 pitches and were arm tired by that point in the season.  A few pitchers back then were of course elite, would be very good today.  Many were guys who might get to AA today.  

I was watching briefly a youtube on Gunner Stockton with video of his playing football at about age 8 at QB thinking how much training kids get these days if they stay with it.  They come out of HS much better prepared than when I was in school (and freshmen then couldn't play Varsity).

EastAthens

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 274
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1268 on: November 26, 2025, 02:56:12 PM »
i remember a number of years back someone asked Pete Rose, a true student of the game, if Rose would benefit more from playing in Ty Cobb's era or Cobb in Rose's and his answer was ambivalent. He thought Cobb's era was hurt by the lack of uniformity of the ball itself and that playing in the modern era would give more power numbers but playing in Cobb's era would result in higher batting averages because of the development and evolution of the slider since then.

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5482
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1269 on: November 28, 2025, 10:32:05 AM »
After watching that abomination last week and now realizing that 3 out of 5 OLs on a line that was historically bad at its highest point, I'm calling it now:  LSU won't score a single point on OU.  

Actually, they'll probably get bored and lose focus at some point and let us get close enough for a FG or maybe even a lone TD.  But a shutout is coming if OU stays engaged.  

OU   20
LSU  3

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4500
  • Liked:

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87899
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1271 on: November 28, 2025, 11:23:47 AM »
These figures are more than enough to drive me away from wanting to poach another HC.

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5482
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1272 on: November 28, 2025, 11:34:07 AM »
https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/47113365/lsu-officially-terminates-football-coach-brian-kelly-cause

LSU has to pay Kelly $54 MM. 

Finally.  I'd say "not a good look for the university trying to get out of it," but it's really the board, and more specifically, politicians behind them, that are responsible for these fiascos.  Most of the people who run the operations at the school aren't making the decisions that are so dumb.

I guess I got my answer on a personality like Woodward as AD, though.  I've mentioned here over the years that the AD position at LSU has been largely a ceremonial one, a figurehead of sorts, he doesn't have the real power ADs tend to have at other schools.  He's a front-man for the president, and more accurately, the politicians in the state legislature behind them, and to a lesser extent, the governors.  Scott Woodward has a strong personality and is not built to be a yes-man, and wasn't in his roles at Washington, A&M, etc.  I wondered when we hired him if he'd butt heads with the PTBs and what would happen if he did, because historically, the very few ADs LSU had who tried to exert their own power were run out on a rail.  

Welp, Woodward fired the football coach, without the board's approval, and found himself canned the next day.  Guess that answers that.  

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23426
  • Liked:
Re: SEC Front Porch
« Reply #1273 on: November 28, 2025, 01:23:47 PM »
Would it be accurate to think Florida has an advantage in getting Kiffin over LSU just because the LSU job seems to be drama-filled?  Am I off on that?
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.