It’s a matchup that has been made on two previous occasions, once in December 2017 (Edgar pulled out with an injury) and later in March 2018 (Holloway pulled out with an injury). Edgar has won three of his last four matchups, most recently a unanimous decision victory against Cub Swanson in April 2018.
But his one win in the last 18 months pales in comparison to Alexander Volkanovski‘s three — against Jose Aldo, Chad Mendes and Darren Elkins. At 20-1, he’s on a 17-fight win streak and had a legitimate chance at fighting next for the belt. Should he have been given the opportunity?
We asked this question to ESPN’s MMA contributors — Ariel Helwani, Brett Okamoto, Marc Raimondi, Jeff Wagenheim and Phil Murphy — for their take.
Helwani: My feelings about this decision remind me of how I felt when the Knicks traded Kristaps Porzingis earlier this year (sorry, it’s Draft Lottery day. I have a one track mind, but stay with me here …). Initially, I was confused and upset. After all, title shots shouldn’t be lifetime achievement awards. A one-fight winning streak should never trump a 17-fight winning streak. Is this sport or just politics? And then when you consider Edgar hasn’t fought in 13 months and Volkanovski is 3-0 since then with wins over the likes of Jose Aldo (who is 2-0 against Edgar, mind you) and Chad Mendes … it’s truly one of the more baffling decisions the UFC has made recently.