CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: Brutus Buckeye on December 15, 2017, 09:59:50 PM

Title: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 15, 2017, 09:59:50 PM

Mt Union kicks things off with a 12-0 victory in the Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl. 

A touchdown, a field goal, a safety, an extra point and a shut out. 

13th National Championship since 1993. 



(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.turner.ncaa.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2F4x2%2Fpublic%2Fthumbnails%2Fvideo%2Fncaa-video-_844.jpg%3Fitok%3DvHoGlAtD&hash=1dd620047873a60277ef759dfb297e77)
OAC-OAC-OAC! 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 16, 2017, 08:54:22 AM
Had my company Christmas party last night. Lots of good people and lots of good food. Man, I'm blessed with a great staff.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 16, 2017, 09:24:22 AM
had my company Xmas party yesterday at noon

then I went to the bar
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 16, 2017, 09:47:14 AM
Heading to a friend's house later on, for a steak and lobster meal. I'm making a scratch Caesar salad and a mushroom/polenta dish for an appy.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 10:01:21 AM


It looks as though the best Bowl Game today will be Boise and Oregon in Vegas. 



(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.oregonlive.com%2Fcollegefootball_impact%2Fphoto%2Fthepunchjpg-3f7e3196bedb6ff7_large.jpg&hash=f5f3a9fbc89f7939dc5f78c20867e9a7)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on December 16, 2017, 10:03:36 AM
Good friend had his annual Christmas Party last nite.Always a lively chop busting crowd got home about 8 hrs ago.We very much got into watching Mt.Union winning their 13th National Title :singing:
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 16, 2017, 10:26:30 AM

It looks as though the best Bowl Game today will be Boise and Oregon in Vegas.
I'm taking Boise
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 11:17:02 AM
I'm taking Boise
that would be sweet. 
In reading a preview of that game, it turns out that Scott Frost was the Oregon AC that had to restrain Blount from charging into the stands after he sucker punched the Boise player. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 16, 2017, 11:30:16 AM
yup, I remember watching that live

Blount hasn't learned a thing to this date
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 16, 2017, 01:19:48 PM
Coaching change + star senior RB sitting out = Boise win
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 01:59:27 PM
Boise would've won anyway. 

They've never lost to the perennially overrated Ducks. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 16, 2017, 03:49:10 PM
Highly doubtful. But Boise State's past history vs the Ducks is 100% irrelevant regarding the outcome of today anyways although it's worth noting this BSU team is a shell of the ones that beat Oregon.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 04:57:23 PM
And this Oregon team is a shell of the ones that Boise beat. So that's a push. 

NC A&T won the Celebration bowl. Hbcu NCs. 

Troy won the New Orleans bowl. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 16, 2017, 05:19:56 PM
These small time western bowls - New Mexico, Las Vegas, defunct Poinsettia - are great appetizers.

Nice to hear Herbstreit doing the Vegas Bowl. Boise St LB Vander Esch dominating the LOS Vs an otherwise absent Ducks team today. Agree with Herbstreit re the Ducks not showing up - if the Duck players made such an effort to voice support for internally promoting Mario Cristobal why not show up and play like you wanted him as your coach?

I definitely want to do a Vegas Bowl someday; Vegas is at its cheapest this time of year, save New Year's Eve. But will wait until that new stadium is built closer to the Strip. I've been to that Sam Boyd Stadium before, where UNLV plays, and it's way out of the way and in the last of its nine rusty lives.

Oregon returns a goal line pick 6 to pull within 10 before the half.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on December 16, 2017, 06:06:00 PM
I dunno if the Uni's are uglier here or Indy-Denver thu. nite.SMDH
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 06:25:26 PM
Georgia State won The Cure Bowl

(https://amazinggracekelly.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/polo-banda-the-cure-codigo-roc-16810546299_3_2009915_0_5_34.jpg)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 16, 2017, 06:38:50 PM
I dunno if the Uni's are uglier here or Indy-Denver thu. nite.SMDH
Oregon unis are ugly as hell, but holy shit are their cheerleaders gorgeous. Uniforms are fine by me so long as they have cheerleaders like that lol. 
This Herbert QB looks like he's got some talent and moxie to him. Just threw a TD pass. If the Oregon D can make a play here and get the ball back they might just get back in this one.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 16, 2017, 06:49:25 PM
Oregon got jobbed on that last offensive series.

#13 smoked that CB on the go route, throw was on point and would've been a TD and #13 got pushed down by the CB and stumbled- no call. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 07:19:33 PM
Boise wins the Vegas Bowl by double digits, remaining undefeated against The Ducks. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Cincydawg on December 16, 2017, 08:17:11 PM
Our VP had a Christmas something every year, I never attended.  The last thing on my mind was fraternizing with people I had to see all week.  I was not gruntled at work at all.

I'm told on occasion someone would get drunk and make a spectacle.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 08:26:42 PM
The Thundering Herd won the New Mexico Bowl.

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 16, 2017, 09:49:17 PM
Texas A@M Commerce wins the D2 NC. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 17, 2017, 12:35:27 AM
Middle Tennessee wins the Camellia Bowl
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Cincydawg on December 17, 2017, 07:55:58 AM
I started watching a couple games yesterday and ended up channel surfing instead.  I'm glad these players get a reward for having a decent season but these bowl games are really struggling for attention and viewership and relevance.

None of that is new of course.  The posts here are reflective of the low level of interest even among rather ardent fans.

Then we get to NYD and there often are 2-3 games at the same time one would wish to watch.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on December 17, 2017, 09:13:12 AM
Truth CD if network wonks would just stagger the line up.Advertising/viewer ship/network haul could all be satisfied.That and put the damn National Championship Game on Friday Nights
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 17, 2017, 10:16:21 AM
I started watching a couple games yesterday and ended up channel surfing instead.  I'm glad these players get a reward for having a decent season but these bowl games are really struggling for attention and viewership and relevance.

None of that is new of course.  The posts here are reflective of the low level of interest even among rather ardent fans.

Then we get to NYD and there often are 2-3 games at the same time one would wish to watch.
It's an interesting question about spreading the games out, though it's not like folks ever get super jazzed about say the Holiday Bowl, which was long the best bowl pre-NYD.
Out of curiosity, I looked at the overlap moments
Purdue-Zona vs Texas-Mizzou Dec. 27, 
TCU-Standford vs MSU-WSU Dec. 28 (Both at 9 EST)
A weird Dec. 29 stacking of 1 p.m. WF-A&M, 3:30 NC State-ASU, 4:30 Kentucky-NW
Dec. 30 Louisville-MissSU, Iowa State-Memphis at 1, 
NYD morning of Mich-SC, UCF-Auburn and ND-LSU starting noon-1

Only 1-2 of those are things I'd be mad to not split screen, and mostly you'd just have to reduce the Big Ten's NYD inventory to solve that. 

(As for the relevance part, it just is part of the structure. Many of these games are TV wallpaper, a more attractive fill-in than college basketball bodybag games. I deeply enjoy Troy-North Texas, but the sport as it is has the natural gap that fans don't totally care about good teams. Then you have the weird split that a 7-5 Iowa team gets more attention that 10-2 Troy, and what can you do? Granted, the Las Vegas Bowl has been toiling in obscurity since 1992, and was the Fresno-based California Raisin Bowl before that. )
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 17, 2017, 10:17:40 AM
Truth CD if network wonks would just stagger the line up.Advertising/viewer ship/network haul could all be satisfied.That and put the damn National Championship Game on Friday Nights
My brain says OSU's title was on a Friday, is that right?
I wonder if the Monday is purely for TV, or if fan experience/tourism factors in. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 17, 2017, 10:45:18 AM
I've never had  intense interest in the bowl games.  Yes,  Jan 1 used to be much more important, but college football for me has always been about Sept./Oct./Nov.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 17, 2017, 10:55:37 AM
Jan 1st used to decide the national championship

the #4 team in the polls usually had an outside chance with a couple upsets and a big win
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on December 17, 2017, 11:00:08 AM
My brain says OSU's title was on a Friday, is that right?
I wonder if the Monday is purely for TV, or if fan experience/tourism factors in.
Yes the '03 game was on a Friday Night.That ensures people who have to work in the ETZ can do so.Just too damn hard to do during a work week
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 17, 2017, 11:01:14 AM
I started watching a couple games yesterday and ended up channel surfing instead.  I'm glad these players get a reward for having a decent season but these bowl games are really struggling for attention and viewership and relevance.

None of that is new of course.  The posts here are reflective of the low level of interest even among rather ardent fans.

Then we get to NYD and there often are 2-3 games at the same time one would wish to watch.
On one hand Bowls like the New Orleans or New Mexico showcase teams I otherwise don't watch, like Marshall, but on the other hand it's hard to get up for match ups between teams who often open the season (or wait until November if Vs the SEC) getting paid to get blown out by the Helmets.
I've heard from schools that from a logistical standpoint it's easier to schedule transportation for these earlier bowls because they occur right as the semester ends, before the band, players, broadcasters, etc can go home then have to be reassembled in late December.

The ratings are OK for what they are, and oddly enough they do get concentrated attention from the gambling and Bowl Pick'em crowds.

I've been to a few of these Boutique-y pre-Christmas bowls before and I've noticed that with the right market and after about 5 years of local traction they start working working pretty well from a community standpoint. The local Casino Resorts start teaming up with the bowl committees to offer bowl weekend specials, a mini parade will get organized downtown, charities and boy scout type groups will run fundraisers in the tailgate area, etc.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 17, 2017, 11:18:47 AM
My brain says OSU's title was on a Friday, is that right?
I wonder if the Monday is purely for TV, or if fan experience/tourism factors in.
Yep.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 17, 2017, 04:49:37 PM
Yes the '03 game was on a Friday Night.That ensures people who have to work in the ETZ can do so.Just too damn hard to do during a work week
Is that last part a reference to attending or warching? 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 17, 2017, 06:35:51 PM
Mid-week Mid-major Mid-stravaganza. 

Tues
Boca Raton Bowl: Akron-FAU

Wed
Frisco Bowl: SMUw-La Tech

Thurs
Gasparilla Bowl: Temple-FIU

Fri
Bahamas Bowl: Ohio-UAB 
Potato Bowl: CMU-Wyoming 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 17, 2017, 08:31:27 PM
football every night this week

gonna be a good week!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 18, 2017, 07:52:48 AM
Might be a tough week for the MAC. I'm not seeing any favorable matchups there, but you never know with the wild and crazy MACtion Conference.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 18, 2017, 08:06:13 AM
Tuesday and Thursday don't do much for me.  I'm interested in seeing Lane's crew, but I can't imagine Akron keeping that remotely close.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 18, 2017, 08:09:01 AM
I'm thinking there will be a few schools next year that will be wishing they gave Lanie a look.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 18, 2017, 08:18:10 AM
I definitely want to do a Vegas Bowl someday; Vegas is at its cheapest this time of year, save New Year's Eve. But will wait until that new stadium is built closer to the Strip. I've been to that Sam Boyd Stadium before, where UNLV plays, and it's way out of the way and in the last of its nine rusty lives.
My guess is that when they move the LV Bowl closer to the Strip they will also upgrade the Bowl.  It will be interesting to see how that works though because my assumption is that the Casinos don't need additional people for NYE/NYD.  Thus, they are probably going to want to stage a major bowl right around Christmas (about a week before NYE/NYD).  We'll see how that works out.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 18, 2017, 01:07:14 PM
Yes, back in the early 90s when the Vegas Bowl began it was scheduled for mid-December (and has stayed since) to avoid the big New Year's Eve crowds in downtown Vegas where the Pre-Bowl rallies all take place. However, so many more rooms have been added since, especially along the Strip where the new stadium will be located near the Manadaly Bay, that I imagine the more difficult upgrade will be the Bowl tie-in. Do they swap their MTN West Champ tie with the Holiday's Big Ten tie-in? The early designs of the new Raiders stadium show plenty of similarity to the U of Phoenix Stadium where the Arizona Cardinals play in Glendale, so it'll be ready to showcase whatever comes its way. Stakeholders are already thinking about when they can host a Super Bowl.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 18, 2017, 01:31:31 PM
I was in Vegas once when the Vegas Bowl was going on.

Took me a minute to figure out why there was so many Boise fans on the strip. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 19, 2017, 09:19:52 PM
Akron's getting reamed by FAU. 

Starting to think Ohio lost to the Zips on purpose, as they get to play UAB in the Bahamas instead. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 19, 2017, 11:25:35 PM
That was my 40 pointer in my bowl pool.  Total mismatch
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 20, 2017, 09:39:20 PM

It looks like Louisiana Tech has this one. 

Although the 'Stangs got a TD right before halftime to pull within 42-10. 

:34:
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 20, 2017, 11:51:53 PM
These games not making a compelling case as to why we need all of these bowls.

As for LV, I think the current tie ins are pretty solid.  Only way I'd want Big Ten involved is if we drop the Holiday.  We have enough tie ins with the Pac 12, and the Pac 12 being there makes sense.  Does the Pac 12 have any ACC or SEC agreements?  Considering their fan base travel issues as is, I get them not going east for a bowl, but I would think they could get some ACC or SEC interest to come west
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 21, 2017, 10:29:43 AM
The Sun Bowl is the PAC 12's only Vs ACC tie-in. No Vs SEC Bowls.

The Sun did better when it had a Big Ten tie-in. Never understood why they never pursued the Big 12, but even though El Paso is in Texas it's slightly closer to the California Coast than Houston, and just as out of the way from most of the Big 12.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 21, 2017, 10:59:57 AM
The Pac 12 stays out west, while the SEC and ACC stay in the Southeast.

Both regions might venture to Texas from time to time in order to take on a Big XII team. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 21, 2017, 11:09:45 AM
Well,  this video (from 1980) should give you a clue as to the enthusiasm level the Big 8 had towards the Sun Bowl.  Of course, in scenario it was Orange Bowl or Sun Bowl.

Can you imagine Urb and Jim  or Saban and Gus playing pranks on each other like these guys used to do in Norman/Lincoln?

The Tacos (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQMpgnI5ERA)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 21, 2017, 11:53:15 AM

Wed
Frisco Bowl: SMUw-La Tech


The Frisco Bowl last night - by the time I tuned in La Tech was already up by several TDs, but as for the Bowl, I didn't know this was in its first year. Somehow figured it was a re-branding of the Armed Forces or Heart of Dallas Bowls, but turns out it's played in the city of Frisco, in a high school football stadium, on the greater edge of the north Dallas area? How many bowls does that give the Metroplex have now? Four?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 21, 2017, 11:56:54 AM
3 too many.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 21, 2017, 01:30:42 PM
Take one of the metroplex bowls and put it in Austin and make it a Pac vs SEC matchup. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CWSooner on December 21, 2017, 02:35:31 PM
I'm thinking there will be a few schools next year that will be wishing they gave Lanie a look.
Pat Jones, former Oklahoma State head coach (Jimmy Johnson's successor) who went on to assistant coaching gigs with the Dolphins and the Raiders and is now a media guy in Oklahoma, said on the air yesterday that he doesn't think Lane Kiffin will ever get hired by a major program because he left Tennessee, USC, and the Raiders in shambles.
Of course, Pat Jones doesn't know everything.  He did coach at Oklahoma State.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 21, 2017, 03:21:08 PM
He wasn't at Tennessee long enough to leave it in shambles, but that's a different story. I don't like him for how he left UT after one season (Willie Taggart is now on this list, along with Todd Graham, who did it twice, among others.). Still, he improved the record there over the prior year (Fulmer's last).

I think USC's problem was more Pat Haden and sanctions than Lane Kiffin.

The Raiders.. they were 2-14 the year before he got there, and Al Davis was the owner. Enough said.

The guy will get a bigger job, assuming he wants one. He seems to have benefitted from his time (and ass chewings) under Saban.

But, he might just be happy where he is. It's a nice place to live.

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: GopherRock on December 21, 2017, 08:43:25 PM
The Strip didn't need help from the bowl this year. The bowl game was the same night as the final round of the National Finals Rodeo. For those of you who haven't been to the NFR, it is a huge deal in Vegas and really takes over the city. Normally the bowl would be this upcoming weekend.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 21, 2017, 08:50:37 PM
hadn't heard of a bad boy mower before tonight

sweet advertising
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 21, 2017, 08:59:52 PM
What is a Gasparilla? Sounds like some kind of Jurassic flower. Or Taco Bell sponsored dog food.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 21, 2017, 11:33:04 PM
a soft drink for a bad boy mower?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 22, 2017, 04:01:19 PM

The Bobcats edged the Blazers 41-6. 



(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww4.pictures.zimbio.com%2Fgi%2FFrank%2BSolich%2BOhio%2Bv%2BPenn%2BState%2B4jeHxDZcbRHl.jpg&hash=7095eea976772200cb06232199267a5b)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 22, 2017, 04:44:54 PM
Looking at the picture of Frank reminds me of story when Solich (as a FB at Nebraska) was trying to avoid being the lightest guy on the team, so he tied and concealed a weight to himself at weigh-in in an attempt to add a few pounds.  It didn't work, he was still the lightest back on the team.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 22, 2017, 06:58:58 PM
tough little mutt
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 22, 2017, 07:30:36 PM
Wyoming spanked Sugar Shane and the Chippewas. 

From today's results, we can safely extrapolate that the Mac East is indeed deeper than the Mac West. 

:72:
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 22, 2017, 07:35:44 PM
yup, another ex-husker player and coach enjoying bolw season

Coach Bohl with the hammer
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 22, 2017, 10:52:38 PM
Looking at the picture of Frank reminds me of story when Solich (as a FB at Nebraska) was trying to avoid being the lightest guy on the team, so he tied and concealed a weight to himself at weigh-in in an attempt to add a few pounds.  It didn't work, he was still the lightest back on the team.

(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdata%3Aimage%2Fjpeg%3Bbase64%2C%2F9j%2F4AAQSkZJRgABAQAAAQABAAD%2F2wCEAAkGBxITEhUTEhMVFRUXGBcYFRcXFxgVFxcYGBcXGBcXGBcYHSggGBolHRUXITEhJSkrLi4uFx8zODMtNygtLisBCgoKBQUFDgUFDisZExkrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrK%2F%2FAABEIAOEA4AMBIgACEQEDEQH%2FxAAbAAACAwEBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAADBAECBQYAB%2F%2FEADsQAAEDAgMFBgYBAgUFAQAAAAEAAhEDIQQSMQVBUWFxIjKBkaHwBhNCscHRUoLhFSMzU2IUcqKy8UP%2FxAAUAQEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA%2F8QAFBEBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP%2FaAAwDAQACEQMRAD8A%2BqOKVquR3FK1XIFqrkq9yLXclHvQVqOQHFXe5AJQezLxeqSoQEzKMyYwGAfVMNHUnRblD4bAILnE8rQfZQYOHw1R%2FcaTz0C1MNsR0jO4cwJnzXRsa1sQBO4BTlM6DqgSpbDpC%2F5JCONls%2FiPJHeYEn01UjMb6ct%2FigRqbEpEaR0KzcVsBzbtOblEFbriUCpjCPpP76Sg5ithXs1aQqtculOJDxEW3yLDzCWfs%2Bm7u%2BmnPkgx2vRqb1bFYXI6NyqxqBlhUyqtVgglpRmFDCJTQGa5Ea5DAVmlAWVC8CrBAJ6UrJpyUrlBn1yk3FNYhJVCgo8oRKvKqgqtDZmy3VTOjd5%2FSJsTA53SWy0ceK6xlBrRAAA5WQDwWFZSGVvjvRatcAShvdEAC3GVi7VxsQBuM9Y9lBuPrixQqmMHG%2F5XP0MS6od4gXPDoOKOxjh3IHM3POEG7h3k96x4b%2FFEqVADGp4C5SOCBAEk9d5TcDpPgSgCX1HCzQwcyCT4AQEKjWnV7CQRMTbkbi6ayfyE%2BKRxONLR3JGhALez1vr0lAeoWA3H56lQ%2Bp%2FG%2FwDV%2FfVKYU03R3hF738CN3knW0aYvDd%2BgFuN9yBOtVzC7XDq0u%2ByWe2NR0I0P6T7ssQXNFxADz5bkJ1B0HK0D8%2BOqBcBSrOpFu%2BRxmYPBUzILK7Sg5ldr0DDSrhBaUZpQXVxKoCrtcgBUSVdaNVZ9cIM6ukaierhI1QgGVZjSTAFyqwtLYlMF9919J9%2F2QdPgKApsDRu3%2FdWrV7KM1rX6JTFjrKAFfGRmPp1v%2BCsJ9QueZ36eP8A8Rq7jJHSPDTzugUBBk%2BA4oH6ENEW97z5Jv54NtI1PPgs8m499FIdp70QblGpzufJoTlIWkW5nVc0cXA6%2BUfoKcJtGtXflp90Wc%2BxiInK02nmUHQBlMmR2j%2FIy7y%2Fsoqkgd5o4SMo8pSpaJLG1CX6m9mjnw3c1LhlMg5jwEAnjJNz0CCG0yCSGUyOO%2B%2FvxQqlcOhppuJ3ZQQPM2UP2hQ0%2BYyT9IvPIkBWpYpjQezk16W6bvcICUcIxoDo03El0c5J1TPz2gTe3h91l%2F4j24sXWytFp62njGkotV50%2BXv%2Bkh0XFyT3f%2FqB11RrhxSmMoRcaflIVsa2MrHNzTJkSZ3aiE5gazz2XQ5pGsgEeEBADKpCLUZCoGoCMCO0ILQjMHNBcNRAxVaEQIFqlYJKtUQ6iXe9BWukqiJUeUu96CFt%2FD7JzmOAWCXLofhh3ZeOY%2FKDXc%2BNDoNOXms1%2BNBMfcj8FXdtDK9zHmw0IEt6Ega30us84ukXGHff8WQMGhLrx4aBXGCE2C9gqwdpuWpRpTdBi43DkCyRbUjqF1NfDSsTF4GCbIM3Eixnf%2B0fDYvKG06PZAE2MF0Rv3SbT1S%2BKmIWfVJs0EtBsY38ufig6rC0y9nypiZzmnYNB17brl%2FMT%2BVWpgWUm5adIFoAz1HGTbhvJMmTbVKYGuwMDKZIA1yRJO4Zp38eSeq0ZgdlsDTtOOm55%2BrndBh0W5nFtKkxgBu67stvqcbC24JbHVm5iBUdVdEmCAwRqdNI3TaAmdoYqgwmkAHP%2BoDP8vTuw0EE24xNzdc8WHNkHamIDA0np2bW6oNbCV9QewNM4JE31lpmPd1v0Hik0F9ZuQ91jWwXcMpLpPUrntl4bO7K7feDy4Rcm3DwWjUwmV5eXtBNg3fAA%2Brd5DoNADL6bnnM8wSZgiCOAtqi0Kr2mDlPnpwWeDaC4EdZJPUlBLC3uP13Gxnlu8EHUVBN%2BKDCrseq51GH94OIvrx99UZwQVajMKEAERoCArSEUAIbQEVoCDFqpOqnKqTqoFKhS70eql3FAJwWrsCu4OIGh1WWVp7BcM%2Fl9wg2jhaZDrPlxLie7qTNzA8Fi45jGmGMAFyIuHDjIK6THsYe80Gxub%2BQNisnGtBu1mnElsEjcIkeCBLAF0iAD1MEeS6rDV8wWHhH5rNAHG8uPWFu4VtoQGcUDEMBGiM4JZ74QZOKwmb35rMqbO1BPlqt6oPfVBc1BzxoPaMosN24deZ6pJtXLOp4zN%2Bo0Mx9109SlKy62DcTEkdOGiBWq%2BmQ0VOyLgU2MaYBsYBytEg6kHkjYPCspy4ue1pnIBkpuI3ZryfAIlDBZZtE6kAT5m6M3DM3DqSASd2uvqgDT%2BU1vYBDjwJBHO%2BqBWaXXDYgdZ6labcM0aK%2Fy%2FVBjNqiRIHjPpCO2q0k93oLmPE3VdqYUgZgJ6LOoXJkQQeMeyg6X4fYGGqwEkBw8CZ9FpOKS%2BHKP%2BVmOribnUgW%2Fa0HMQBzIjXquUK7GhAZrkUPQWhGY1BiVErVTNQHglaiBSolnBM1Eu8oBkLQ2E6KoWfKf2Q6KrDz9lB02Lr5dA57iQQ0Ra0TO4LL2gyJ7RDjZpcXOEcBESZtf1VdqV3SQ1wM6honTja%2FhxS%2BEpZacy4HVwJtM2J7Vj4IDYPsga679Vv4Z1lztDEA9eQ%2B%2FaK18JUtv6myB6rUCTqvQ6tSLflLvegMXqMyAXKQ9BJAXoVQbqSghwQg1EJVXFBACKCOqCHKQ5BOLEtWFiWCd0i4PL9j7LbxB7KwcTU3jVt%2Ffvcg6bYJ%2FwAlv9Xq4%2F3Tb3pfYrYoM6fckor0FC8KzKiCQvNQOsejMqBJNRmSgDXCz6xTVeqs%2Bs5ACqlXtRnlDKCgorSweyaphwbbnaUrQbLgOJA8yujxe0Cxzg0wGwI3aIMXbj3tPZBAa2Xz%2FwAt9tbiOC5mnXuc0ng3QXP21XWbZearcrwCDcSLgrlsRgiwhpJAFxynhwQdFsl5ygQRxIOXw0stppAG4HrJSWzKeWmBpbonqTSSgVqm8qoCbrYeEBwQCDVf5YUK0oKCmr5bKVMoA5VBaiOUQgHlVXNRDZRCAdZvZK51wkwLkyBHH9rqKosehXNYKm5zgRuOvvxQdlSZlY1vAAeQVHlK4PFEvyTI3nmnHIAKQrKQglqK1yG1FaUHLvrO4oLqhUuchOcghzyqiqVBKhxQGp4hbVap8xzHjR8ZuTm6hc24LU2HVkObOha8eBh3ofRBrPhxhJ4nC5sotLXTpu69YTGCrxUe067k1g6PzL2ubeCBqlQMQE1maxsuRqYgLB2s18nfwQFxW2GcCVhYna5J7NM%2Bn7SeM%2BeTlYA3mUlXwteBLqk3zRFuBHFA8dq1Qe4USlt129hj18is%2FC4IQ81X1GkABveJJ3kgbkths5MS7xBj10QddTx7XXGh80Z1a0rF2eySAbLcFCAgB%2F1Td5S1fbDW6NJ52A9Uhtd0Zso018ViMpOcB%2FqF03EwI89UHQjbYNgL%2B%2FFGpbRG4Gd6xcPh61ru365T0G9PYWpXYR8xjSOLdUG9RqZgddCsrAU4bG8k%2BAFlpYF8nkkaQioRwn0QN7Dpd5%2FgPytJ5VcHTyU2jlJ8brz3oKkr2ZDc9U%2BYgZBVg9KfMXhVQYDkNyu5yGSgqVSVYoTnILPTWyKobUaTobHobLPc5GpOQdgMDmmdQLOGvJD2NXiAdQ5wd4mxU7J2hnZl%2Bpog8xuKM6mAdLk3KDbhKY%2FD5m80Q14p5uXqkjtAwgy6lBLVaLuI6ELUrVZMwguaCgxn4Zx4DoFWnhXTA81tfKCIxo0sgQ2Zg%2B3MWWrUCtRpwq1UGLj8L2zG9Kswe%2FQreqtB8EE0wgSpscN%2FojhiKaYVRZBei2EvSpy4De8knpJRajrH0TGBp3kjuiAUDNZyUqORK77pSo9B5xVC5DfUQy9AcvVc6DnXsyDJcVXOr1QhIJlUeFcQqvcEAVdhVZUOKBzC4osIcDcLo9m7RbVexjgQSYsbTBXGiqm9l4rLWpng9v3CD6E5v%2BW4cCQsZxut9w7%2FAF%2B4Cwa9O54oJUhy80WVXIJc9UoOlwHFVcZKj5RBBGoQaZxDW21KA6oCsDHfOdUEOcxo4AXPOdy0KdUwN537kD2caHegnmkWNeapMnKBEbuvMpx4QXCo9S0rzkFaVLM4D3AWgQGiAl8C27jyAVsTUQLV6iRqVVNeolHOQXe9UzqhKqSgLnVmuS8q7SgTfUCGXpbEFzTDg4ciCPuhCsgbNRCfVVNUNzCgsasKrqyDUYVQNN0BH1VNGtBB8fJL3KvTplB9icbnm0H35hY9cXIWhQfFOlO9rQfFo%2FKzMTqfFBBO4IZJU0t8Lz7BB4WVvmJWrXAEkgAbzuS52tRb9WbpogarvnihBrtygY557rI391xVmYh50YZ%2F7XIChxlGzAhJVsa%2BkJeLTFwNfArzNpU3QBYnd%2BUDbVNQobFWq7%2ByB3DGGzxJ%2FSVxdVEMwAAT0SlTC1XaMd5FAnUcgkrSZsOufpA6kJhnw1U3uYPM%2FhBhkqJXSU%2FhfjU8m%2F3TDPhmlvc4%2BIH4QckVIK7Nnw%2FQH0k9XH8Io2JQ%2FwBseZ%2FaB57AbEA9bpKrsbDu1os8o%2ByelelBjv8AhfCn6COjipp%2FC%2BFH%2FwCZPVzvwVryvSgVZs%2Bkwdim0dAJPJBxWyMPUu6ixxO%2BIJ8Qn5SxqZT%2FAMT6H9FBxmLweEaYODqN5%2FMdH5QGtwn%2B1VHSoD92rrto0yQX07%2Fyb%2BufJYFXDMq3DS08QEG6agdhmObIECJ1sYv5LPqPm6ZwdMswgabwSP8AyJ%2FKznui%2Fmgs111L3IDn715oQecwHVBfgqZ%2BgeAg%2BYRw0quYjVAqzZ5E%2FLqvZOolXbhKgmMQ6%2FX9q9Q8lSlJ3IIoYBsySXnUk6c0%2BymAqs0VstkEAwmtm4cvcbxG%2Fgd0SlCNw98yiYt%2FygDeDvGhKDebs6e9Wqn%2BrL%2F6wjjBx3XOH9RP3K5el8Qhu53p%2B1p4L4oovc1pD2lxAEgESbDQoHHmrTs5wfJtAIMWsRPqnmutwVazZMoWIrZRzNh193QGY%2BRKvKBT0AVi8ICgqZQpUygoKitnSArHn6qjsYRoJQaRchOquGrfK%2FokDjn%2FAO2UJ%2B1nDVhHWf0g0RjG77dUOqyZy34jjyWc7azT3mT4fpD%2FAOpoky15YeeiBltUtMOlp3OOh5O%2FaM2oWmw11buPNp3H0KSDajxGalUHJ3a8J3odPE1KXYrMOX6XWjzFgUGnjqzXUjHG43jqFhVAtZxY4SDI4ixHKfwVkPDRZrwT%2FF3Zd4bneCBSq6FOHxV72Q3VQ7Qyl6jEG02CrBoKxKWMLdbhNsxgOhQaUBVa0JL%2FAKjmpZiBxQPwFWqYCVGKEJepiC48AgepOldLgaQdSyuAIMyDcELlcPUDbkwtB3xVRpUwGzUdwFm%2BLj%2BJQD2l8HtMmlULBrDrgeOsLmaLRScYeHuBs5s5RzHPmrbW27WxFnOhn8G2Hjvd4pFoI3frxKDbw3xBVZ9Ut4Oun8B8Qtc5z63eFmNAJEb4PFcvlJ6I1F4ZBBE67ig7Sji61buNyN4laFDDZbk5jxP4C5fZ%2FwAVvBy1AC3jEEeA1XUUKmcBwMg3BQHzL0oD67G6vYP6glHbWo3%2FAM1tp0vprog5z%2FFq8d868G8uA9yju2zWAkGdbECw6iJus0jx80Z1KQwt7wmNYIOrSPBAcbfrcG8zl58irj4jq72t1junTcZz6obcOD%2FxI3SdUKrgODh0trbeUBztt7jekwz%2FAMb%2FAHQK%2BPBBJpNHgb%2F%2BJG5RhM9Pd6X196J6njTpPgQDN0GH%2FiWWCGC3Js%2BeSU6z4nqAQGg8jp5iFovrU3SH0WEcRAPpdK1dmYZ3ceWde0PMIK0fiFw7Rw4AO9joJ5GZspxLsNiQO38qpuziG9J3eao3YlTRrmOH%2FdH3XnbBrRdgPiCgyMbg61AjOLHRzTLT0cEJm0zob%2FdNV6D2AsOdrSbtM5esaLNr4cFA63FsO%2BOtkUtBCxHYdw0M8lVuKez6XDpceSDeaw8T5q7KXElZNDbQ0d9i30K9V2xPdHoXINsuDRJsOe5JV9p%2Fx8zp4Desr5lV57p6u%2FA3K9KgfqcPfRAd%2BIc7Uk%2B%2BCsxpKhuUaAn0CsXE9OSC0HQe%2BqI8OAvlA3AEz6IWZefUJiUE%2FNPHzuqAmdfQKzdF4uQQC7%2BRHQ%2FhEw1Uh13vA3wTPkTCDovIOjdspjgCyo6OItboAOHojYbYDALl0%2F1WBifGxWbsPafyyGO7h05FdfRIIkb770HJt098U1R0b1H5Xl5A3V19%2FwAUCt9XQfleXkFR3vNJHT%2Bkry8gYq6eH4S43%2B%2FpC8vICU%2Fp8fyumwG7w%2FCheQH2z%2Fp%2BK%2BfYrvnqvLyBR%2BqMPfkvLyCrtPfFWpfpQvIBV9fJCYvLyAo3K68vIJ4qvv7KV5BcKrvfqvLyCX6BV4ry8guz36Lsvh7%2FAEz73Ly8g%2F%2FZ&hash=2cc79071198399402ded1ad446d2404e)
(https://www.huskermax.com/images/handoff.jpg)
(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdataomaha.com%2Fmedia%2Fhusker_history%2Fgame-photos%2Fsolich.JPG&hash=b96eedc307b42b092574287ea21ae373)
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/f53969e5ebe81fbe3c35639d6e4772c2/tumblr_inline_n4e2msSZmW1qm0tji.jpg)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 23, 2017, 12:17:31 AM
Pretty bleak slate tomorrow. 

Birmingham: Texas Tech - South Florida

Armed Forces - San Diego St - Army  

Saving the best for last... 

Dollar General - Appalachian State and Toledo; the battle of the two teams that have recently orchestrated monster Michigan upsets.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 23, 2017, 08:42:10 AM
I wagered lunch on South Florida and San Diego St.

so, I'm interested

It's a brother thing
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 23, 2017, 09:25:37 AM
Builders made great progress this week, specifically the framers.  Getting our first snow of the season this morning.  May have to check out a bowl game for once today. I missed MAC week
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 23, 2017, 09:29:45 AM
I can remember when homes weren't built in the winter

Always wanted to design and build my own home.  Had a couple designs drawn up.

Good times
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CWSooner on December 23, 2017, 11:08:22 AM
(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdata%3Aimage%2Fjpeg%3Bbase64%2C%2F9j%2F4AAQSkZJRgABAQAAAQABAAD%2F2wCEAAkGBxITEhUTEhMVFRUXGBcYFRcXFxgVFxcYGBcXGBcXGBcYHSggGBolHRUXITEhJSkrLi4uFx8zODMtNygtLisBCgoKBQUFDgUFDisZExkrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrK%2F%2FAABEIAOEA4AMBIgACEQEDEQH%2FxAAbAAACAwEBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAADBAECBQYAB%2F%2FEADsQAAEDAgMFBgYBAgUFAQAAAAEAAhEDIQQSMQVBUWFxIjKBkaHwBhNCscHRUoLhFSMzU2IUcqKy8UP%2FxAAUAQEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA%2F8QAFBEBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP%2FaAAwDAQACEQMRAD8A%2BqOKVquR3FK1XIFqrkq9yLXclHvQVqOQHFXe5AJQezLxeqSoQEzKMyYwGAfVMNHUnRblD4bAILnE8rQfZQYOHw1R%2FcaTz0C1MNsR0jO4cwJnzXRsa1sQBO4BTlM6DqgSpbDpC%2F5JCONls%2FiPJHeYEn01UjMb6ct%2FigRqbEpEaR0KzcVsBzbtOblEFbriUCpjCPpP76Sg5ithXs1aQqtculOJDxEW3yLDzCWfs%2Bm7u%2BmnPkgx2vRqb1bFYXI6NyqxqBlhUyqtVgglpRmFDCJTQGa5Ea5DAVmlAWVC8CrBAJ6UrJpyUrlBn1yk3FNYhJVCgo8oRKvKqgqtDZmy3VTOjd5%2FSJsTA53SWy0ceK6xlBrRAAA5WQDwWFZSGVvjvRatcAShvdEAC3GVi7VxsQBuM9Y9lBuPrixQqmMHG%2F5XP0MS6od4gXPDoOKOxjh3IHM3POEG7h3k96x4b%2FFEqVADGp4C5SOCBAEk9d5TcDpPgSgCX1HCzQwcyCT4AQEKjWnV7CQRMTbkbi6ayfyE%2BKRxONLR3JGhALez1vr0lAeoWA3H56lQ%2Bp%2FG%2FwDV%2FfVKYU03R3hF738CN3knW0aYvDd%2BgFuN9yBOtVzC7XDq0u%2ByWe2NR0I0P6T7ssQXNFxADz5bkJ1B0HK0D8%2BOqBcBSrOpFu%2BRxmYPBUzILK7Sg5ldr0DDSrhBaUZpQXVxKoCrtcgBUSVdaNVZ9cIM6ukaierhI1QgGVZjSTAFyqwtLYlMF9919J9%2F2QdPgKApsDRu3%2FdWrV7KM1rX6JTFjrKAFfGRmPp1v%2BCsJ9QueZ36eP8A8Rq7jJHSPDTzugUBBk%2BA4oH6ENEW97z5Jv54NtI1PPgs8m499FIdp70QblGpzufJoTlIWkW5nVc0cXA6%2BUfoKcJtGtXflp90Wc%2BxiInK02nmUHQBlMmR2j%2FIy7y%2Fsoqkgd5o4SMo8pSpaJLG1CX6m9mjnw3c1LhlMg5jwEAnjJNz0CCG0yCSGUyOO%2B%2FvxQqlcOhppuJ3ZQQPM2UP2hQ0%2BYyT9IvPIkBWpYpjQezk16W6bvcICUcIxoDo03El0c5J1TPz2gTe3h91l%2F4j24sXWytFp62njGkotV50%2BXv%2Bkh0XFyT3f%2FqB11RrhxSmMoRcaflIVsa2MrHNzTJkSZ3aiE5gazz2XQ5pGsgEeEBADKpCLUZCoGoCMCO0ILQjMHNBcNRAxVaEQIFqlYJKtUQ6iXe9BWukqiJUeUu96CFt%2FD7JzmOAWCXLofhh3ZeOY%2FKDXc%2BNDoNOXms1%2BNBMfcj8FXdtDK9zHmw0IEt6Ega30us84ukXGHff8WQMGhLrx4aBXGCE2C9gqwdpuWpRpTdBi43DkCyRbUjqF1NfDSsTF4GCbIM3Eixnf%2B0fDYvKG06PZAE2MF0Rv3SbT1S%2BKmIWfVJs0EtBsY38ufig6rC0y9nypiZzmnYNB17brl%2FMT%2BVWpgWUm5adIFoAz1HGTbhvJMmTbVKYGuwMDKZIA1yRJO4Zp38eSeq0ZgdlsDTtOOm55%2BrndBh0W5nFtKkxgBu67stvqcbC24JbHVm5iBUdVdEmCAwRqdNI3TaAmdoYqgwmkAHP%2BoDP8vTuw0EE24xNzdc8WHNkHamIDA0np2bW6oNbCV9QewNM4JE31lpmPd1v0Hik0F9ZuQ91jWwXcMpLpPUrntl4bO7K7feDy4Rcm3DwWjUwmV5eXtBNg3fAA%2Brd5DoNADL6bnnM8wSZgiCOAtqi0Kr2mDlPnpwWeDaC4EdZJPUlBLC3uP13Gxnlu8EHUVBN%2BKDCrseq51GH94OIvrx99UZwQVajMKEAERoCArSEUAIbQEVoCDFqpOqnKqTqoFKhS70eql3FAJwWrsCu4OIGh1WWVp7BcM%2Fl9wg2jhaZDrPlxLie7qTNzA8Fi45jGmGMAFyIuHDjIK6THsYe80Gxub%2BQNisnGtBu1mnElsEjcIkeCBLAF0iAD1MEeS6rDV8wWHhH5rNAHG8uPWFu4VtoQGcUDEMBGiM4JZ74QZOKwmb35rMqbO1BPlqt6oPfVBc1BzxoPaMosN24deZ6pJtXLOp4zN%2Bo0Mx9109SlKy62DcTEkdOGiBWq%2BmQ0VOyLgU2MaYBsYBytEg6kHkjYPCspy4ue1pnIBkpuI3ZryfAIlDBZZtE6kAT5m6M3DM3DqSASd2uvqgDT%2BU1vYBDjwJBHO%2BqBWaXXDYgdZ6labcM0aK%2Fy%2FVBjNqiRIHjPpCO2q0k93oLmPE3VdqYUgZgJ6LOoXJkQQeMeyg6X4fYGGqwEkBw8CZ9FpOKS%2BHKP%2BVmOribnUgW%2Fa0HMQBzIjXquUK7GhAZrkUPQWhGY1BiVErVTNQHglaiBSolnBM1Eu8oBkLQ2E6KoWfKf2Q6KrDz9lB02Lr5dA57iQQ0Ra0TO4LL2gyJ7RDjZpcXOEcBESZtf1VdqV3SQ1wM6honTja%2FhxS%2BEpZacy4HVwJtM2J7Vj4IDYPsga679Vv4Z1lztDEA9eQ%2B%2FaK18JUtv6myB6rUCTqvQ6tSLflLvegMXqMyAXKQ9BJAXoVQbqSghwQg1EJVXFBACKCOqCHKQ5BOLEtWFiWCd0i4PL9j7LbxB7KwcTU3jVt%2Ffvcg6bYJ%2FwAlv9Xq4%2F3Tb3pfYrYoM6fckor0FC8KzKiCQvNQOsejMqBJNRmSgDXCz6xTVeqs%2Bs5ACqlXtRnlDKCgorSweyaphwbbnaUrQbLgOJA8yujxe0Cxzg0wGwI3aIMXbj3tPZBAa2Xz%2FwAt9tbiOC5mnXuc0ng3QXP21XWbZearcrwCDcSLgrlsRgiwhpJAFxynhwQdFsl5ygQRxIOXw0stppAG4HrJSWzKeWmBpbonqTSSgVqm8qoCbrYeEBwQCDVf5YUK0oKCmr5bKVMoA5VBaiOUQgHlVXNRDZRCAdZvZK51wkwLkyBHH9rqKosehXNYKm5zgRuOvvxQdlSZlY1vAAeQVHlK4PFEvyTI3nmnHIAKQrKQglqK1yG1FaUHLvrO4oLqhUuchOcghzyqiqVBKhxQGp4hbVap8xzHjR8ZuTm6hc24LU2HVkObOha8eBh3ofRBrPhxhJ4nC5sotLXTpu69YTGCrxUe067k1g6PzL2ubeCBqlQMQE1maxsuRqYgLB2s18nfwQFxW2GcCVhYna5J7NM%2Bn7SeM%2BeTlYA3mUlXwteBLqk3zRFuBHFA8dq1Qe4USlt129hj18is%2FC4IQ81X1GkABveJJ3kgbkths5MS7xBj10QddTx7XXGh80Z1a0rF2eySAbLcFCAgB%2F1Td5S1fbDW6NJ52A9Uhtd0Zso018ViMpOcB%2FqF03EwI89UHQjbYNgL%2B%2FFGpbRG4Gd6xcPh61ru365T0G9PYWpXYR8xjSOLdUG9RqZgddCsrAU4bG8k%2BAFlpYF8nkkaQioRwn0QN7Dpd5%2FgPytJ5VcHTyU2jlJ8brz3oKkr2ZDc9U%2BYgZBVg9KfMXhVQYDkNyu5yGSgqVSVYoTnILPTWyKobUaTobHobLPc5GpOQdgMDmmdQLOGvJD2NXiAdQ5wd4mxU7J2hnZl%2Bpog8xuKM6mAdLk3KDbhKY%2FD5m80Q14p5uXqkjtAwgy6lBLVaLuI6ELUrVZMwguaCgxn4Zx4DoFWnhXTA81tfKCIxo0sgQ2Zg%2B3MWWrUCtRpwq1UGLj8L2zG9Kswe%2FQreqtB8EE0wgSpscN%2FojhiKaYVRZBei2EvSpy4De8knpJRajrH0TGBp3kjuiAUDNZyUqORK77pSo9B5xVC5DfUQy9AcvVc6DnXsyDJcVXOr1QhIJlUeFcQqvcEAVdhVZUOKBzC4osIcDcLo9m7RbVexjgQSYsbTBXGiqm9l4rLWpng9v3CD6E5v%2BW4cCQsZxut9w7%2FAF%2B4Cwa9O54oJUhy80WVXIJc9UoOlwHFVcZKj5RBBGoQaZxDW21KA6oCsDHfOdUEOcxo4AXPOdy0KdUwN537kD2caHegnmkWNeapMnKBEbuvMpx4QXCo9S0rzkFaVLM4D3AWgQGiAl8C27jyAVsTUQLV6iRqVVNeolHOQXe9UzqhKqSgLnVmuS8q7SgTfUCGXpbEFzTDg4ciCPuhCsgbNRCfVVNUNzCgsasKrqyDUYVQNN0BH1VNGtBB8fJL3KvTplB9icbnm0H35hY9cXIWhQfFOlO9rQfFo%2FKzMTqfFBBO4IZJU0t8Lz7BB4WVvmJWrXAEkgAbzuS52tRb9WbpogarvnihBrtygY557rI391xVmYh50YZ%2F7XIChxlGzAhJVsa%2BkJeLTFwNfArzNpU3QBYnd%2BUDbVNQobFWq7%2ByB3DGGzxJ%2FSVxdVEMwAAT0SlTC1XaMd5FAnUcgkrSZsOufpA6kJhnw1U3uYPM%2FhBhkqJXSU%2FhfjU8m%2F3TDPhmlvc4%2BIH4QckVIK7Nnw%2FQH0k9XH8Io2JQ%2FwBseZ%2FaB57AbEA9bpKrsbDu1os8o%2ByelelBjv8AhfCn6COjipp%2FC%2BFH%2FwCZPVzvwVryvSgVZs%2Bkwdim0dAJPJBxWyMPUu6ixxO%2BIJ8Qn5SxqZT%2FAMT6H9FBxmLweEaYODqN5%2FMdH5QGtwn%2B1VHSoD92rrto0yQX07%2Fyb%2BufJYFXDMq3DS08QEG6agdhmObIECJ1sYv5LPqPm6ZwdMswgabwSP8AyJ%2FKznui%2Fmgs111L3IDn715oQecwHVBfgqZ%2BgeAg%2BYRw0quYjVAqzZ5E%2FLqvZOolXbhKgmMQ6%2FX9q9Q8lSlJ3IIoYBsySXnUk6c0%2BymAqs0VstkEAwmtm4cvcbxG%2Fgd0SlCNw98yiYt%2FygDeDvGhKDebs6e9Wqn%2BrL%2F6wjjBx3XOH9RP3K5el8Qhu53p%2B1p4L4oovc1pD2lxAEgESbDQoHHmrTs5wfJtAIMWsRPqnmutwVazZMoWIrZRzNh193QGY%2BRKvKBT0AVi8ICgqZQpUygoKitnSArHn6qjsYRoJQaRchOquGrfK%2FokDjn%2FAO2UJ%2B1nDVhHWf0g0RjG77dUOqyZy34jjyWc7azT3mT4fpD%2FAOpoky15YeeiBltUtMOlp3OOh5O%2FaM2oWmw11buPNp3H0KSDajxGalUHJ3a8J3odPE1KXYrMOX6XWjzFgUGnjqzXUjHG43jqFhVAtZxY4SDI4ixHKfwVkPDRZrwT%2FF3Zd4bneCBSq6FOHxV72Q3VQ7Qyl6jEG02CrBoKxKWMLdbhNsxgOhQaUBVa0JL%2FAKjmpZiBxQPwFWqYCVGKEJepiC48AgepOldLgaQdSyuAIMyDcELlcPUDbkwtB3xVRpUwGzUdwFm%2BLj%2BJQD2l8HtMmlULBrDrgeOsLmaLRScYeHuBs5s5RzHPmrbW27WxFnOhn8G2Hjvd4pFoI3frxKDbw3xBVZ9Ut4Oun8B8Qtc5z63eFmNAJEb4PFcvlJ6I1F4ZBBE67ig7Sji61buNyN4laFDDZbk5jxP4C5fZ%2FwAVvBy1AC3jEEeA1XUUKmcBwMg3BQHzL0oD67G6vYP6glHbWo3%2FAM1tp0vprog5z%2FFq8d868G8uA9yju2zWAkGdbECw6iJus0jx80Z1KQwt7wmNYIOrSPBAcbfrcG8zl58irj4jq72t1junTcZz6obcOD%2FxI3SdUKrGODh0trbeUBztt7jekwz%2FAMb%2FAHQK%2BPBBJpNHgb%2F%2BJG5RhM9Pd6X196J6njTpPgQDN0GH%2FiWWCGC3Js%2BeSU6z4nqAQGg8jp5iFovrU3SH0WEcRAPpdK1dmYZ3ceWde0PMIK0fiFw7Rw4AO9joJ5GZspxLsNiQO38qpuziG9J3eao3YlTRrmOH%2FdH3XnbBrRdgPiCgyMbg61AjOLHRzTLT0cEJm0zob%2FdNV6D2AsOdrSbtM5esaLNr4cFA63FsO%2BOtkUtBCxHYdw0M8lVuKez6XDpceSDeaw8T5q7KXElZNDbQ0d9i30K9V2xPdHoXINsuDRJsOe5JV9p%2Fx8zp4Desr5lV57p6u%2FA3K9KgfqcPfRAd%2BIc7Uk%2B%2BCsxpKhuUaAn0CsXE9OSC0HQe%2BqI8OAvlA3AEz6IWZefUJiUE%2FNPHzuqAmdfQKzdF4uQQC7%2BRHQ%2FhEw1Uh13vA3wTPkTCDovIOjdspjgCyo6OItboAOHojYbYDALl0%2F1WBifGxWbsPafyyGO7h05FdfRIIkb770HJt098U1R0b1H5Xl5A3V19%2FwAUCt9XQfleXkFR3vNJHT%2Bkry8gYq6eH4S43%2B%2FpC8vICU%2Fp8fyumwG7w%2FCheQH2z%2Fp%2BK%2BfYrvnqvLyBR%2BqMPfkvLyCrtPfFWpfpQvIBV9fJCYvLyAo3K68vIJ4qvv7KV5BcKrvfqvLyCX6BV4ry8guz36Lsvh7%2FAEz73Ly8g%2F%2FZ&hash=568a796f0642822ed58ce8265bb015fc)
(https://www.huskermax.com/images/handoff.jpg)
(https://www.cfb51.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdataomaha.com%2Fmedia%2Fhusker_history%2Fgame-photos%2Fsolich.JPG&hash=b96eedc307b42b092574287ea21ae373)
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/f53969e5ebe81fbe3c35639d6e4772c2/tumblr_inline_n4e2msSZmW1qm0tji.jpg)
Heh!  Great pictures of Fearless Frankie.

That top picture almost looks like it's from an OU game, but I think it's vs. Arkansas in the '64 (season) Cotton Bowl.

#2 and #3 are from the '65 Air Force game, where Solich became the first Husker to run for 200 yards.

I liked it when UCLA and Nebraska wore those curly-cue-font numbers on their jerseys.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 23, 2017, 11:18:10 AM
Some of these smaller bowls could stand out with some kitschy sponsorship. If you're not going to take advantage of the given geography - Cactus Bowl,  Sun Bowl, Citrus Bowl - what do you have to lose going low brow and having Hooters sponsor your Bowl? In fact, I think Hooters tried but were turned down by the NCAA, but they'd be a perfect fit for one of those pre-Christmas Florida-based bowls. First Hooters opened in Sarasota. The New Mexico Bowl could be sponsored Alienware. Today's Birmingham Bowl could be better sponsored by Waffle House. The Military Bowl could be sponsored by Old Bay. Anyway, my point is that Hooters (or Twin Peaks or Tilted Kilt) should get a bowl.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 23, 2017, 11:21:13 AM
Builders made great progress this week, specifically the framers.  Getting our first snow of the season this morning.  May have to check out a bowl game for once today. I missed MAC week
When is the move happening?

We're going to Florida in a couple of months with the goal being to purchase a vacant lot on the water. My plan is to build much of the home myself, but we'll see.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 23, 2017, 12:00:24 PM
Our builder is deliberate, we know this, he's built my in laws home and my brother in law.
He does a lot of trim and cabinet work himself w his guys.  He doesn't build more than a couple at a time.
  I'm guessing spring 19. We have no timetable.

Homes have always been built in winter, in recent history even in Canada.  Though certain tasks are no go, brick laying and the like.  We poured, set, have all the floor joists down, sub floor is capped.  Have had nice dry fall.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 23, 2017, 03:05:08 PM
Pretty defensive game between Texas Tech and USF
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 23, 2017, 03:45:50 PM
Offense finding stride here in the end.   Meanwhile Penny busts one for 81yds 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 23, 2017, 03:55:55 PM
Nice crowd in ft worth for armed forces bowl.  Game could be under 3hrs.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 23, 2017, 06:13:53 PM
Hard to top this sdsu v army bowl game for nonmarquee games.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 23, 2017, 06:35:14 PM
Breathtaking final drive for Army.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rook119 on December 23, 2017, 06:41:17 PM
good gawd

(https://s14.postimg.org/cm73cwdch/armysdsu.jpg)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 23, 2017, 08:07:58 PM
running the football is good
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CWSooner on December 23, 2017, 11:47:48 PM
The team that can run and stop the run will win many battles.

~ Sun Tzu
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 24, 2017, 08:37:32 AM
And pressure the QB.

Those are the 3 magic ingredients to winning games.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 24, 2017, 08:39:06 AM
The team that can run and stop the run will win many battles.

~ Sun Tzu
What's more impressive: Before the game, SDSU was 8th in rushing yards allowed per game (3.5 a carry) and 12th in rushing yards per game (5.5 a carry). 
What Army's staff has done is flat-out remarkable. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 24, 2017, 08:54:44 AM
Pretty bleak slate tomorrow.

Birmingham: Texas Tech - South Florida

Armed Forces - San Diego St - Army  

Saving the best for last...

Dollar General - Appalachian State and Toledo; the battle of the two teams that have recently orchestrated monster Michigan upsets.
I was tied up the last couple days and didn't see this, but this schedule was bleak to you? Brand really does guide how we watch this sport.
USF came in at 9-2, with one of the most prolific and entertaining QBs in the country, plus a defense that took massive strides under a new coach in Year 1. Won't cape for Tech that hard. They're not this board's flavor, but a decent watch if you like passing offenses that put up the numbers.
Army was 9-3, SDSU 10-2. Aztecs have one of the best I-form offenses in the land, a bit of a curious attack that primarily moved the ball with big plays, especially from the 2,000-yard back (plus a pretty decent defense from one of the better non-P5 coaches in recent memory). Army is a resurgent story, a squad that went from the bottom rung to nine wins with steady progress. Their coach would be moving up but for the option. 
And then you had a 11-3 champion with one of the most efficent QBs in the country and one of the most prolific in recent memory, leading one of the most prolific attacks around (full of productive guys), against a 8-4 co-conference champ that's been subtly built on solid defense and an explosive rushing attack (I think it was downhill, but don't quote me) paired with a decent little passing game.
If a day where five of the six teams had 11, 10, 9, 9, 8 wins, with a couple conference champs and the commander and chief winner is bleak, then badmouthing early bowl season is a self-fulfilling prophecy. (We got two good games out of three, granted one involved the 6-6 P5 team, and the third was a kind of one-sided upset. Not too shabby)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 24, 2017, 09:08:48 AM
I enjoyed the football yesterday, bowls included
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 24, 2017, 10:24:08 AM
What's more impressive: Before the game, SDSU was 8th in rushing yards allowed per game (3.5 a carry) and 12th in rushing yards per game (5.5 a carry).
What Army's staff has done is flat-out remarkable.
You betcha. And remarkable is good in the case.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 24, 2017, 11:19:54 AM
Nice crowd in ft worth for armed forces bowl.  Game could be under 3hrs.

Noticed that too - a surprisingly full and lively stadium for a bowl game between two teams not geographically close to Ft Worth. Wonder how it worked out that that crowd came together so well. And a great game too. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CWSooner on December 24, 2017, 11:58:13 AM
Breathtaking final drive for Army.
Yes, it was.
For me, that game in general and that drive in particular have been the highlights of bowl season so far.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 26, 2017, 12:42:59 PM
Heading to downtown Phoenix later and will attend tonight's Cactus Bowl - UCLA Vs Kansas St. Josh Rosen apparently not yet cleared to play by the medical staff but wants to. We'll see, but not likely. Attended this bowl two other times back when it was played at Sun Devil stadium. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 26, 2017, 01:55:28 PM
16 year old me would never believe that I would not possess the knowledge that WVU's QB was out for their year, and their #1 RB was skipping the bowl game before picking them.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 26, 2017, 05:25:03 PM
We pulled the plug on family bowl picks this year after about 35 years.  It's a shame.
I might catch a little bit of UCLA ksu, but would rather watch the world Jr hockey tonight instead of these bowls.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 26, 2017, 07:00:00 PM
I picked KSU for the win and will be watching

could be Wild Bill's last game on the sideline
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 26, 2017, 07:25:08 PM
We pulled the plug on family bowl picks this year after about 35 years.  It's a shame.
I might catch a little bit of UCLA ksu, but would rather watch the world Jr hockey tonight instead of these bowls.
We expanded ours this year, up to 14.  But limited it to 20 bowls instead of the full schedule.  I kind of like removing the games where you can't name a player on either team.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 27, 2017, 12:43:25 PM
Back from last night's Cactus Bowl. A more entertaining game in person than it probably was on TV. We sat in the mostly K-State section, and the momentum shift favoring the Wildcats in the second was quite palpable. Jed Fisch, UCLA's OC/interim HC brought a great game plan that got UCLA a ten point lead going into halftime, but as has been a problem for UCLA all season, eventually the Bruin front seven wore out and ground-first team like K-State controlled the second half. 

As the first time I've been to a KState game, their fans were great. More knowledgeable than the UCLA base, more into the game, and not at all arrogant.

As for the stadium, Chase field where the Diamondbacks play made for a better than expected venue. We had good seats between the 30s on the K-State side of the field, and attendance was high, but the biggest thing to overcome in playing a football game inside of a designed baseball stadium will always be how the seated fans see the field. Sitting on the home dugout side of the baseball field, the view of the home plate area was clear as the sight lines area designed as such, but it wasn't so clear when looking into the outfield where the football action took place and you have to look across the shallow seating of too many heads in the way to clearly see the outfield. Our section did a lot of standing. And there's also the issue of the seats being too offset from the sidelines, so that though the seats are low to the field, they are far away from it as well. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 27, 2017, 01:29:46 PM
looked great from my recliner
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 27, 2017, 01:35:27 PM
Good report.   Game was ok on TV, so long as you muted it.  They spent more time talking about Rosen (obviously in street clothes) and the MFING nfl draft than they did the game.   Espn is so tone deaf on its in game production the last few years.    KSU fans are good folks, and were always great hosts in Manhattan.

Your comments on the ballpark for seating are quite apt.   I spent a lot of time selling peanuts, etc at County Stadium, and they used to host a few Packers games each season.   The low pitch of lower decks is a deathblow for viewing football in a baseball stadium.     It barely mattered that both teams were on the same sideline (on the outfield side) All the best football seats  (bleachers, 1st base upper grandstand/upper box) were the crummiest seats for baseball.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 27, 2017, 03:31:30 PM
How bad is Southern Miss that essentially the 2nd team of a bad Florida State team is wiping the floor with them?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CWSooner on December 27, 2017, 04:10:53 PM
Back from last night's Cactus Bowl. A more entertaining game in person than it probably was on TV. We sat in the mostly K-State section, and the momentum shift favoring the Wildcats in the second was quite palpable. Jed Fisch, UCLA's OC/interim HC brought a great game plan that got UCLA a ten point lead going into halftime, but as has been a problem for UCLA all season, eventually the Bruin front seven wore out and ground-first team like K-State controlled the second half.

As the first time I've been to a KState game, their fans were great. More knowledgeable than the UCLA base, more into the game, and not at all arrogant.

As for the stadium, Chase field where the Diamondbacks play made for a better than expected venue. We had good seats between the 30s on the K-State side of the field, and attendance was high, but the biggest thing to overcome in playing a football game inside of a designed baseball stadium will always be how the seated fans see the field. Sitting on the home dugout side of the baseball field, the view of the home plate area was clear as the sight lines area designed as such, but it wasn't so clear when looking into the outfield where the football action took place and you have to look across the shallow seating of too many heads in the way to clearly see the outfield. Our section did a lot of standing. And there's also the issue of the seats being too offset from the sidelines, so that though the seats are low to the field, they are far away from it as well.
Good report.  I caught the game on radio and TV.  Classic K-State/Bill Snyder football game.  His teams aren't the most talented, but they play hard, fundamentally sound football, and they don't quit.  That 98-yard drive to clinch the victory was classic Bill Snyder football.
Good report.   Game was ok on TV, so long as you muted it.  They spent more time talking about Rosen (obviously in street clothes) and the MFING nfl draft than they did the game.   Espn is so tone deaf on its in game production the last few years.    KSU fans are good folks, and were always great hosts in Manhattan.

Your comments on the ballpark for seating are quite apt.   I spent a lot of time selling peanuts, etc at County Stadium, and they used to host a few Packers games each season.   The low pitch of lower decks is a deathblow for viewing football in a baseball stadium.     It barely mattered that both teams were on the same sideline (on the outfield side) All the best football seats  (bleachers, 1st base upper grandstand/upper box) were the crummiest seats for baseball.
Yep.  K-State has good fans.  It was good to see them get to cheer Wild Bill on in what may be his last game.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 27, 2017, 05:53:55 PM
BC with a good looking drive
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Riffraft on December 27, 2017, 06:13:24 PM
Back from last night's Cactus Bowl. A more entertaining game in person than it probably was on TV. We sat in the mostly K-State section, and the momentum shift favoring the Wildcats in the second was quite palpable. Jed Fisch, UCLA's OC/interim HC brought a great game plan that got UCLA a ten point lead going into halftime, but as has been a problem for UCLA all season, eventually the Bruin front seven wore out and ground-first team like K-State controlled the second half.

As the first time I've been to a KState game, their fans were great. More knowledgeable than the UCLA base, more into the game, and not at all arrogant.

As for the stadium, Chase field where the Diamondbacks play made for a better than expected venue. We had good seats between the 30s on the K-State side of the field, and attendance was high, but the biggest thing to overcome in playing a football game inside of a designed baseball stadium will always be how the seated fans see the field. Sitting on the home dugout side of the baseball field, the view of the home plate area was clear as the sight lines area designed as such, but it wasn't so clear when looking into the outfield where the football action took place and you have to look across the shallow seating of too many heads in the way to clearly see the outfield. Our section did a lot of standing. And there's also the issue of the seats being too offset from the sidelines, so that though the seats are low to the field, they are far away from it as well.
I gave serious thought to head over to the game, but it was to see Rosen play since there is a good chance the Browns may draft him. Once I heard he wasn't going to play I decided against it. Thanks for the report
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 27, 2017, 09:11:34 PM
rooting for the Horns tonight
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 27, 2017, 09:17:08 PM
NFL would've melted down after that Purdue td.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 27, 2017, 09:18:38 PM
rooting for the Horns tonight
Man it must be cold in NW Iowa to cause you to post that.    Though Mizzou hasn't been likable for quite some time.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 27, 2017, 09:28:41 PM
not as hard as I thought it might be

I have $$$ on the Horns

I also had money on the FSU Noles, but couldn't really root for them vs So Miss

5 above, warmed up enough to snow about an inch.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 27, 2017, 09:57:28 PM
Foster Farms Bowl wins weirdest uniform numbering styles
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 27, 2017, 10:03:02 PM
Boilers representing!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 27, 2017, 10:09:59 PM
Damn, Purdue with a prime chance to really blow it open squandered there.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 27, 2017, 10:22:02 PM
They're not bad numerals.   Better than Under Armour where the back of the Jersey has the numbers so low and the last names are riding below the shoulder blade.   Ucla unis have been ruined by UA.

They would be interesting to see stretched over those early 90s high neck and shoulder pads .
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 27, 2017, 10:25:40 PM
we need more neck rolls and less hoodies sticking out of the shoulder pads

was always going to ask Badger fans about their DBs wearing those hoodies under their pads

who thinks that is a good idea?  And why would the coach allow it?  Why wouldn't their mother say something?

talk about a horse collar
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 27, 2017, 10:58:18 PM
Keep it up Purdue, you're doing the Lord's work.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 27, 2017, 10:59:03 PM
Of course right as I'm posting that uofa scores a TD 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 27, 2017, 11:01:55 PM
yup, right back in the game
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 27, 2017, 11:04:19 PM
and the pick!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 27, 2017, 11:07:04 PM
GOD dammit Purdue.

*Edit: no idea why the board software insists in making the word "g o d" all caps because I've tried to edit it several times now. Oh well.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 27, 2017, 11:34:21 PM
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Mh7UG2K2bi8/hqdefault.jpg)

That's the high pad look I'm talking about.   KSU whole D had that look, as did other teams. Imagine that hideous UA UCLA jersey pulled over those pads.  Yes, that's the '94 game, where Matt Turman basically handed the ball to LP, and threw screen balls all day.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 28, 2017, 12:11:08 AM
What. A. Catch.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Honestbuckeye on December 28, 2017, 12:15:45 AM
Great game so far.   Come on Boilers....finish it!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 28, 2017, 12:16:07 AM
Whew. Thank you, Boilermakers!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 28, 2017, 12:21:47 AM
That excuse me while I take this ball strip at the end of the 2nd quarter which voided a likely AZ score turned to a Purdue FG serves as the margin in this one.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: utee94 on December 28, 2017, 12:51:46 AM
rooting for the Horns tonight
I always knew you were a closet Horn.
It was a pillow fight but winning is always better than losing.  Here's hoping for better in the future!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 07:36:44 AM
My lack of faith in the Big Ten knocked my down a few pegs in my bowl pick ems last night.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 28, 2017, 09:17:22 AM
I hadn't really noticed this until now but Ohio State missing the CFP may have really helped the B1G overall in bowl match-ups.  

The conference is already 2-0 and I believe that both were favored.  For the remaining games (lines from the Worldwide leader):

The B1G team is higher ranked and favored in all of our games and I think that missing the CFP has a lot to do with that.  If the Buckeyes had made the playoff and everyone rotated up one slot we might be underdogs in all of our bowls.  

Here is hoping for an 8-0 bowl record!  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 09:21:23 AM
I'm not sure it would have mattered.  OSU would have been in the CFP, but it's not like MSU or Northwestern would have moved up into the NY6.  OSU would have a tougher matchup, but I think everyone else would have stayed put.  Wisconsin and PSU may have simply been in different NY6 bowls, but the other teams I think would be identically positioned.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 28, 2017, 09:27:58 AM
Well, even if the lower-tier teams had stayed put, moving PSU and UW to different NY6 games still may have cost us a couple of favorites in addition to tOSU being an underdog in the CFP instead of a favorite in the Cotton Bowl.  

It might not be quite as big of a deal as I was thinking, but it still could have been a pretty big difference between (I believe) eight favorites as opposed to five/three (favorites/underdogs).  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 10:48:24 AM
Probably would have shifted Alabama to the Orange, PSU to the Cotton and Wisconsin to the Fiesta.

So yeah, that would give all 3 (OSU, PSU and Wisconsin) tougher games.

Also then with no Big Ten team in the Orange, it would have been the Big Ten, not the ACC in the Citrus.  So now either UM or MSU is in the Citrus against LSU, with the other in the Outback.  Then yeah, everyone does shift up one.  Probably the only team that works out for is MSU in the event that it's UM to the Citrus, MSU goes to the Outback, and gets an easier opponent in South Carolina than Washington State.

So, you were right, carry on.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 28, 2017, 01:04:12 PM
what the hell was with Tom Herman mocking Missouri QB Drew Lock's TD dance? Don't get me wrong, Drew Lock looks like a grade A douche every time he does that dance, but he's a 20-21 year old kid. Herman is a grown ass man in his 40's. Shouldn't be mocking a college kids TD dance.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 28, 2017, 01:23:33 PM
what the hell was with Tom Herman mocking Missouri QB Drew Lock's TD dance? Don't get me wrong, Drew Lock looks like a grade A douche every time he does that dance, but he's a 20-21 year old kid. Herman is a grown ass man in his 40's. Shouldn't be mocking a college kids TD dance.
the same thing with him bragging about sending his sr's out with a winning season and a championship. you went 7-6 with a texas bowl win. have some self respect and acknowledge it was a good end to a disappointing season. surely texas isn't happy with that.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 28, 2017, 01:29:57 PM
the same thing with him bragging about sending his sr's out with a winning season and a championship. you went 7-6 with a texas bowl win. have some self respect and acknowledge it was a good end to a disappointing season. surely texas isn't happy with that.
I don't think his first season was disappointing at all. It was his first season, and a complete rebuild job. He was never going to come in there year 1 and go 11-1 or 12-0. That thing was a mess that was going to take time to clean up.
He went 7-6 in his first year and his team took 3 top 10 teams- USC, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State down to the wire. He lost those 3 games by a combined 11 points, and 2 of them were lost in OT.
The only real dud was the loss to Maryland. But it was the first game of the season and his first game ever as head coach. I guess I'll give him a slight pass, just because of the fact it was Game 1.
The guy has the #3 recruiting class in the country, and will finish with at worst a top 5 class after all the LOI's are in and he might even challenge for #1 if he pulls off some flips or gets some unexpected signings.
Future looks pretty bright in Austin to me. Herman just needs to grow up and stop acting like a douche.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 28, 2017, 02:28:20 PM
I don't think his first season was disappointing at all. It was his first season, and a complete rebuild job. He was never going to come in there year 1 and go 11-1 or 12-0. That thing was a mess that was going to take time to clean up.
He went 7-6 in his first year and his team took 3 top 10 teams- USC, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State down to the wire. He lost those 3 games by a combined 11 points, and 2 of them were lost in OT.
The only real dud was the loss to Maryland. But it was the first game of the season and his first game ever as head coach. I guess I'll give him a slight pass, just because of the fact it was Game 1.
The guy has the #3 recruiting class in the country, and will finish with at worst a top 5 class after all the LOI's are in and he might even challenge for #1 if he pulls off some flips or gets some unexpected signings.
Future looks pretty bright in Austin to me. Herman just needs to grow up and stop acting like a douche.
agree with most of that to an extent.
he was never going to go 12-0/11-1, but lets not act like it was a good season either. showed progress and laid ground work to build on? sure i can buy that. ended on a high note? agreed. not so different from saban's first year at bama. but lets pump the brakes when saying you're sending the sr's out with a championship.
i still think he'll do well, but he needs to step back and realize he is the head man now, not a grad assistant that can get away with those things.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 28, 2017, 02:43:42 PM
what the hell was with Tom Herman mocking Missouri QB Drew Lock's TD dance? Don't get me wrong, Drew Lock looks like a grade A douche every time he does that dance, but he's a 20-21 year old kid. Herman is a grown ass man in his 40's. Shouldn't be mocking a college kids TD dance.
If I could post the .gif here I would, I was dying of laughter when I saw it. I like Herman more now than I did before.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 09:25:55 PM
Dantonio still hasn't figured out how to scheme against this type of offense.  As long as you stay content with 5-6 yard completions, you'll dice them up.

Also enjoying UM slappy Joel Klatt calling Kenny Willekes the lone bright spot on MSUs defense this year.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 28, 2017, 09:35:14 PM
I know it's early but the way it's looking if Stanford wins Kenny Hill will be their MVP.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 09:40:19 PM
MSUs passing game is an absolute mess.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 28, 2017, 09:54:57 PM
MSUs passing game is an absolute mess.
Stanford feels the same way about their two headed excuse.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 28, 2017, 09:57:48 PM
Stanford feels the same way about their two headed excuse.
Aside from the one pick Costello for Stanford has actually been great. That TD he threw earlier was beautiful.
Kenny Hill for TCU on the other hand... yikes.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 28, 2017, 10:02:07 PM
That is true in retrospect.  I guess I'm thinking of all of the QB bs I've seen from them this season.  TCU not helping themselves at all.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 10:12:02 PM
Refs are letting a TON of contact go in coverage both ways.  That tends to be advantage MSU
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: PortlandSpartan on December 28, 2017, 10:38:04 PM
Offense got it together once we mixed in more Lewerke runs. 

Oh and it took an entire season but Warner finally figured out QB sneaks work on short yardage pretty much every time. Running the same power to RB less so. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 10:43:32 PM
MSU outgained WSU 200-30 in the 2nd quarter.  Outscored them 21-0.  It's like the first quarter of the Northwestern game, but with the score to match.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 11:01:00 PM
Boom or bust Felton Davis faked bust with that early 4th down drop and is having a boom game.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 28, 2017, 11:01:26 PM
TCU going back to the trick well, this time it pays off.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 11:17:19 PM
LOL, Gus Johnson mentions how young MSU is, and Klatt can't help but mention that UM is also young.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 11:18:39 PM
Maybe let's tone down the QB runs up 30 in a bowl game?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 11:23:53 PM
Hey, there's that guy who half the fan base wanted to burn his redshirt in 2013 because we had nobody better than Cook.

Good for Terry.  Give him the rest of the game.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 11:33:39 PM
If my player got a 15 yard taunting penalty while losing 35-3, he wouldn't see the field again.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 28, 2017, 11:57:10 PM
Such a crap target call.   The guy (Scott) could not have done anything, short of bailing on making the play, to avoid that.  No win for the player, the way the rule is written and enforced.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 28, 2017, 11:58:01 PM
Alamo Bowl has gotten wild.   TCU w two massive TDs, huge speed on display.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 11:58:40 PM
I can't recall a team talking more shit while getting blown out than this WSU team.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 28, 2017, 11:59:59 PM
Such a crap target call.   The guy (Scott) could not have done anything, short of bailing on making the play, to avoid that.  No win for the player, the way the rule is written and enforced.
Worst part is that he misses the first half of the opener next year I assume.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 29, 2017, 12:00:55 AM
It has been a bit unseemly by Wazzu.   Not a good look at all.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 29, 2017, 12:01:50 AM
Is that a Friday night game against some team with a long name?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: grillrat on December 29, 2017, 12:33:17 AM
Wow.  I'm actually starting to feel bad for the Pac.  They are gettinbg killed this bowl season.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 12:47:54 AM
Is that a Friday night game against some team with a long name?
Utah State
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 29, 2017, 12:51:38 AM
After a ridiculously ugly 1st quarter for TCU the Alamo became a really good game to watch. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 08:04:53 AM
I completely went to bed thinking Stanford was going to roll.  Good job Froggies.  How do they look next year with the Bucks headed down that way?

MSU with a layup against Wazzu.

Nice slate today, with count'em four day games and only one night game, and I have to stay up for the night game.  Kind of interesting stories in every game, but it is a little wild that Todd Graham is still coaching at ASU for the bowl game.  I'm hoping every play is a trick play.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 29, 2017, 09:10:14 AM
Loving the way the B1G has done so far.  3-0 with five to go.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on December 29, 2017, 10:07:28 AM
Isn't the B1G favored in pretty much all of its games?  Most years the B1G are dogs (and often sizably so) in the majority of the bowls.

I don't think they'll keep up the pace and go 8-0, but I think 6-2 is realistic.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 29, 2017, 10:28:43 AM
Isn't the B1G favored in pretty much all of its games?  Most years the B1G are dogs (and often sizably so) in the majority of the bowls.

I don't think they'll keep up the pace and go 8-0, but I think 6-2 is realistic.
Yes.  I posted about it the other day (last post on page 4 of this thread, updated here to include MSU's win):
I hadn't really noticed this until now but Ohio State missing the CFP may have really helped the B1G overall in bowl match-ups.  

The conference is already 3-0 and I believe that both were favored.  For the remaining games (lines from the Worldwide leader):
  • #21 NU is favored by 7.5 tomorrow afternoon against n/r UK
  • #5 tOSU is favored by 7.5 tomorrow night against #8 USC
  • #9 PSU is favored by 2 Saturday afternoon against #11 UW
  • #6 UW is favored by 4.5 Saturday night against #10 Miami, FL
  • n/r Michigan (no line given yet) Monday afternoon against n/r USCe

The B1G team is higher ranked and favored in all of our games and I think that missing the CFP has a lot to do with that.  If the Buckeyes had made the playoff and everyone rotated up one slot we might be underdogs in all of our bowls.  

Here is hoping for an 8-0 bowl record!  
A lot of it is due to not getting a team into the CFP.  In the first three years of the CFP we had a team in.  Those three teams (tOSU 2x and MSU) went 1-2 in their semi-final games and I believe they were all underdogs.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 29, 2017, 10:44:34 AM
Wow.  I'm actually starting to feel bad for the Pac.  They are gettinbg killed this bowl season.
Yeah it's not good but all things considered it's not that bad either.
Boise State over Oregon - head coach gone and star RB sat out
Utah over WVU - decent win for Pac
KState over UCLA - head coach fired and star QB sat out
Purdue over uofa - good win for B1G, uofa has no excuse

Mich St over Wazzu - QB, best WR, and best Def. player out. (I still think MSU woulda won but not a blowout)

TCU over Stanford - close game, evenly matched teams, could have gone either way.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on December 29, 2017, 11:42:48 AM
Yes.  I posted about it the other day (last post on page 4 of this thread, updated here to include MSU's win):A lot of it is due to not getting a team into the CFP.  In the first three years of the CFP we had a team in.  Those three teams (tOSU 2x and MSU) went 1-2 in their semi-final games and I believe they were all underdogs.  
Yep. It's been one of my regular gripes since the BCS started. There were a lot of years where the B1G would have a representative in the BCS championship and then the next team up gets slotted up into the Rose against the PAC champion, and every other B1G team would be slotted against one level higher of competition. 
It gets even worse when you start getting into the "Big Six" bowls and the years when the B1G got three teams into those. Bowls which wouldn't normally have had a B1G affiliation take one of our top teams (in addition to the CFP semifinal AND the Rose), and then you might have teams slotted 2-3 levels higher in competition than they should have been.
Getting snubbed for the CFP probably helped us by making sure our bowl matchups were even or potentially even in the B1G's favor as other conferences are being forced to slot into higher-end bowl games than they otherwise would.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 02:59:18 PM
Belk Bowl is going to take 6 hours.  Enjoy Northwestern-Kentucky online
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 04:30:05 PM
Wake Forest totally collapsing after dominating the first half.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 29, 2017, 04:36:40 PM
As much as I hoped ASU would send Graham out with a win, they're living up to their abysmal 0-3 record in bowl games with lame duck coaches:

Bruce Snyder lost the 2000 Aloha Bowl, Dirk Koetter lost the 2006 Hawaii Bowl, Dennis Erickson lost the 2011 Vegas Bowl, and short of a miraculous comeback Todd Graham will likely lose the 2017 Sun Bowl.

I wonder what bowl Herm Edwards will lose after he's fired following a 6-6 season in 2022...
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 04:47:23 PM
ASU with an onside kick dumb enough to make me think Herm has already taken over.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on December 29, 2017, 04:48:49 PM
ASU with an onside kick dumb enough to make me think Herm has already taken over.
ASU has actually converted 3 onside kicks this season, on 4 attempts. Given the success rate I can't be too mad.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 04:53:29 PM
Kentucky looks good so far ... ~???
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 04:56:02 PM
Belk Bowl is going to take 6 hours.  Enjoy Northwestern-Kentucky online
it's on espn2
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on December 29, 2017, 05:03:01 PM
WF and A&M love some defense, huh?

Part of me thinks that A&M will get a FG to send this to overtime, but that assumes Wake can stop them from scoring a TD in 2:18. I don't think anyone can make that assumption.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 05:11:17 PM
down goes A&M

SEC! SEC! SEC!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 29, 2017, 05:13:29 PM
giving 3.5 points to the Aggies didn't quite work

funny how Vegas can guess on those spreads
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 29, 2017, 05:16:04 PM
Some of us laid 3
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 29, 2017, 05:18:52 PM
WF and A&M love some defense, huh?

Part of me thinks that A&M will get a FG to send this to overtime, but that assumes Wake can stop them from scoring a TD in 2:18. I don't think anyone can make that assumption.
Holy crap, nine straight possessions ended in either a turnover (2 fumbles by Wake, 1 INT by aTm), or points (2TD's and a FG each).  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 05:21:12 PM
after 1 quarter

UK 7
NU 3
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 05:26:58 PM
Thorson injured on a trick play where he catches a pass from Justin Jackson 

dammit ...
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 05:27:51 PM
Thorson injured, clutching his knee after catching a pass on a trick play.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 05:29:28 PM
Thorson injured, clutching his knee after catching a pass on a trick play.
Thorson injured, clutching his knee after catching a pass on a trick play.
Crap, cart coming out
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 05:40:27 PM
Kentucky's best player just got ejected for shoving an officials hands off of him
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 05:44:48 PM
A 7-5 Kentucky team, lacking a win over anyone with a pulse, chanting S-E-C at a team event is about the most SEC thing ever.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 29, 2017, 05:56:28 PM
Some of us laid 3
I'd rather have the push.  Cost me two points
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 06:17:44 PM
Music City Bowl refs real ejection happy
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 06:55:20 PM
'Cats winning 17-7 in the 3rd qtr
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 06:58:37 PM
ugh

UK rushing TD ... PAT is good

UK 14
NU 17
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 29, 2017, 07:09:32 PM
Kentucky's best player just got ejected for shoving an officials hands off of him
Was a ridiculous ejection imo. 
Targeting was stupid too. 
Refs just not good in this game so far. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 07:17:50 PM
After 3 quarters:

UK 14
NU 17

go 'Cats!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ncbuck71 on December 29, 2017, 07:22:01 PM
Last drive by Northwestern does not bode well for the game.  Feel like momentum heading the wrong way.  Come on Northwestern!!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 07:45:57 PM
This game is bizarre. NW runs reverse on fourth and one, which does not end well
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 29, 2017, 07:46:48 PM
Not sure why you don’t run there with the way the rb have been running. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 29, 2017, 07:48:59 PM
Nw pick6 big there
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 07:51:13 PM
dumbass play call on 4th and 1 for the 'Cats ... trick play that fails miserably

umm.... maybe hand the ball off 'cuz you're 1 yard away?!

That said, we just got a Pick Six so it's all good :P

UK 14
NU 24
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 29, 2017, 07:53:01 PM
that pick 6 probably sealed the deal for NW. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 07:55:13 PM
Sounds like Denzel Ward gonna sit this one out #gulp
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 29, 2017, 07:56:33 PM
Sounds like Denzel Ward gonna sit this one out #gulp
Can't say I blame him if he sits. He's a 1st round lock. Nothing to gain and everything to lose with an injury.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 29, 2017, 07:59:07 PM
would be very interesting to see what Pat Fitzgerald could do at a helmet school like FSU or LSU. My guess? He'd crush it. 

B1G is more loaded at head coach than it's ever been imo.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 29, 2017, 08:00:49 PM
All NW needs here is to kill like 3 mins and make 'Tucky burn their TO's and this  thing is wrapped up.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 08:01:02 PM
wildcat (blue) FG

UK 17
NU 24
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 08:01:37 PM
Sounds like ESPN will bury their conference challenge standings this bowl season.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 08:04:31 PM
Can't say I blame him if he sits. He's a 1st round lock. Nothing to gain and everything to lose with an injury.
No doubt. But I was looking forward to seeing him one last time against a great team. Also not looking forward to seeing his replacement
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 29, 2017, 08:10:55 PM
Why would you go for that?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 08:13:05 PM
Looked like he got boned on spot
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 08:13:41 PM
this playcalling is pissing me off ... dammit  :96:
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 29, 2017, 08:16:24 PM
Looked like he got boned on spot
Maybe. Was close but I think was right call to stick with call on field from replay. Not clear enough to say one way or another.
Td uk. Tied if they make xp

Edit: going for win. These coaches want this game over. They wanna watch cotton bowl or something?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 08:18:57 PM
I'm so damn nervous right now ... chewing gum furiously
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 29, 2017, 08:20:46 PM
Nw wins on dropped 2pt conversion. Interesting game to watch. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 08:20:59 PM
NW!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 08:21:09 PM
Phew.

That would have been a loss that I would drop NW behind sub .500 teams in my power rankings.  Easiest bowl matchup of any Big Ten team.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 08:21:34 PM
wow, conversion is no good

need to recover the onside kick
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on December 29, 2017, 08:22:21 PM
yes

hell yeah!!!!!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 29, 2017, 08:23:04 PM
And we have a new wrost onside kick in football history
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 08:23:11 PM
Welp let's hope the Buckeyes keep the B1G perfect
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 29, 2017, 08:23:30 PM
Nw rb in top10 rushing yard in Cfb history. Impressive. 

Good win. Hope the qb is ok. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on December 29, 2017, 08:43:00 PM
Congrats to NW  good job
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 29, 2017, 08:55:59 PM
Bosa with a Hell of a sack
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 29, 2017, 09:13:16 PM

Bruce Snyder lost the 2000 Aloha Bowl, Dirk Koetter lost the 2006 Hawaii Bowl, Dennis Erickson lost the 2011 Vegas Bowl, and short of a miraculous comeback Todd Graham will likely lose the 2017 Sun Bowl.
On top of us all knowing that a lame duck coached team won't be motivated, the opposite was easy to call for NC State. Dave Doeren just signed a bloated extension and because of that I knew he'd have his squad motivated for at least this game.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 29, 2017, 09:21:32 PM
Is there a team that converts 4th and short better than tOSU with JT Barrett? 4th and 2 or less and it's like it's automatic. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 29, 2017, 09:32:10 PM
No clue what Darnold was thinking there. And that's why I'd take Rosen over him if I was an NFL team. Rosen is a better pure passer, seems like a smarter player who reads coverages and anticipates better. Rosen doesn't have nearly as many WTF was that moments. 

Darnold a big talent and I think he'll be a good pro, but when you're picking #1 or #2 you go with the more "sure" pick. Not that Rosen is a sure pick, no one is a sure pick. He's just more sure than Darnold.

OSU up 17-0 looks like they are about to open up a can of whoop ass.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 30, 2017, 12:35:35 AM
I'm not in love with any of these guys at qb, but people going bonkers over this Darnold tape.  Peyton Manning was humiliated in his final college game.  Relax
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 30, 2017, 12:36:38 AM
OSU edged USC in the Cotton Bowl
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 30, 2017, 01:04:55 AM
B1G is 5-0!!!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 30, 2017, 07:34:23 AM
B1G is 5-0!!!
And the last three teams are favored if I’m reading it right. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 30, 2017, 07:37:09 AM
I’m also late on this, but man Army and Navy would’ve scored triple digits if their opponents didn’t have all that prep time. I’ve oft been told that gimmick isn’t effective with extra time, so just imagine what those could’ve been. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 30, 2017, 08:00:25 AM
The Cotton Bowl was as interesting as Jerry World.  

PSU and Wiscy up today in two good games.  I think Washington was the best team in the PAC this year, so we'll see what PSU has for them.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 30, 2017, 10:36:13 AM
GO BIG TEN
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 30, 2017, 01:31:15 PM
I'm not in love with any of these guys at qb, but people going bonkers over this Darnold tape.  Peyton Manning was humiliated in his final college game.  Relax
Yeah it was only one game but this kid has had turnover problems and he's only been a starter 2 years. Peyton was a starter 4 straight years didn't turn it over quite as often, he was far more efficient and advanced than Darnold but clearly less physically gifted.
I think he'll be a good pro. I just happen to think Rosen will be a better one. Rosen is Goff or Matt Ryan 2.0. Similar build and athletic skills, but better arm talent than either. I like Rosen a lot man. I think he's gonna be realllllll good.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 30, 2017, 01:54:07 PM
A pro Trump PAC running a pro Mitch McConnell ad during the TaxSlayer Bowl promoting Mitch as America's real tax slayer wins most surprising moment of bowl season 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on December 30, 2017, 02:49:15 PM
I missed that.  Suppose that's a shrewd ad.  The tax and cpas of the world are the most popular people at NYE parties this year.   I've spent way too much time this week planning.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 30, 2017, 02:56:27 PM
Refs just handed Iowa State a TD by overturning an INT with a phantom roughing the passer call.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on December 30, 2017, 02:56:57 PM
A pro Trump PAC running a pro Mitch McConnell ad during the TaxSlayer Bowl promoting Mitch as America's real tax slayer wins most surprising moment of bowl season
Explain? link to ad?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on December 30, 2017, 02:59:30 PM
Refs just handed Iowa State a TD by overturning an INT with a phantom roughing the passer call.
Well dang it. Missed it, I saw the interception, flipped it back to see Miss St score on Louisville, then see your post. How phantom was the call?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 30, 2017, 03:15:51 PM
Well dang it. Missed it, I saw the interception, flipped it back to see Miss St score on Louisville, then see your post. How phantom was the call?
I mean there was contact, but it wasn't that late, and it wasn't a tackle.  He just sort of bumped him a second late.  There either needs to be more contact than that, or terribly late, and it was neither.  It was minimal contact, marginally late.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 30, 2017, 03:16:23 PM
Explain? link to ad?
I mean wasn't the OP an explanation of the ad?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 30, 2017, 04:26:30 PM
Not too shabby of a start Nits.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 30, 2017, 04:54:49 PM
Not too shabby of a start Nits.
yeah it looks like they are pulling away from Washington.
Pac taking it on the chin this bowl season.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on December 30, 2017, 05:39:16 PM
 Rosen doesn't have nearly as many WTF was that moments.

I'd love for this to be on the back of football cards as a stat.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 30, 2017, 06:01:34 PM
Nitters looking great, but those two turnovers were the difference between a game that's over and a game.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 30, 2017, 07:42:53 PM
Just got back from LA.

Watched the PSU game (mostly) on the flight. TV is free in all classes on Virgin. First time flying first class too, which was pretty neat but not worth the cost in my opinion.

Anyway, 82 degrees yesterday and 2 degrees right now. Big swing.


Nice win for Penn State. What a job Franklin has done over there. And I see the B1G is doing pretty well too. Hopefully that will continue tonight. 

Go Big Red!!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on December 30, 2017, 08:01:17 PM
ON WISCONSIN!

let's keep that B1G bowl streak going. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on December 30, 2017, 08:04:06 PM
I guess that the Pac 12 is lucky that they added the Utes.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on December 30, 2017, 08:31:31 PM
brought out the chain early...
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on December 30, 2017, 09:10:42 PM
Some nifty pass for Wiscy
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CatsbyAZ on December 30, 2017, 09:26:03 PM
Wisconsin is doing to Miami exactly what they did to Michigan - letting their opponent get their early punches in while sticking to the game plan and taking over once the emotions of the kickoff wear off.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 30, 2017, 09:44:52 PM
Wisconsin is doing to Miami exactly what they did to Michigan - letting their opponent get their early punches in while sticking to the game plan and taking over once the emotions of the kickoff wear off.
two major things happened to change that game.
Peters got knocked unconscious into next Wednesday and Hornibrook went from playing like crap to playing like Tom Brady and dropping dimes on the money. Once Wisconsin got a lead and Peters was out for the count, there was no way in hell J'OKe was ever getting them back in that game.
Hornibrook obviously has some talent, he's a decent QB. Not great. Decent. As long as he doesn't make dumb mistakes you can win lot of games with him. But he's obviously limited. He is just incredibly streaky. When he's on, man he's pretty good. When he's off, oh man is he terrible. With some consistentcy and taking care of the ball he'd be a pretty good QB.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 30, 2017, 09:52:39 PM
Richt should have been booted
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 30, 2017, 09:59:06 PM
I'd like to know what happened there with Richt. And yeah, he should be gone.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 30, 2017, 10:36:54 PM
This is stressful. I dislike the stressful part. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on December 30, 2017, 10:48:18 PM
I'd like to know what happened there with Richt. And yeah, he should be gone.
There were two bad missed calls against Wisconsin, but you are going to be on both sides of missed holding calls every single game.  If coaches got that mad about missed holding calls youd see that reaction every game.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: gopher on December 30, 2017, 11:36:01 PM
Congrats Wisconsin!  Nice win.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on December 30, 2017, 11:40:30 PM
7-0 B1G!

Michigan will screw it up but 7-1 is still really good!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: PortlandSpartan on December 30, 2017, 11:42:40 PM
B1G with 4 top ten teams to start the year? (The east big 3 - OSU, PSU, MSU - and Wiscy)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on December 30, 2017, 11:44:36 PM
7-0 B1G!

Michigan will screw it up but 7-1 is still really good!
Ouch. I'll try hard not to root against ttun.
Congrats to Wisconsin, great win. Great season. Lots of young talent coming back next season.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 30, 2017, 11:45:56 PM
There were two bad missed calls against Wisconsin, but you are going to be on both sides of missed holding calls every single game.  If coaches got that mad about missed holding calls youd see that reaction every game.
Or a turnover chain that should have never come out?

Great season for Big Red. 13 wins for the first time ever and beating Miami for their first home loss is pretty damn good. Being down 14-3 made it even better.

Paul Chryst... Pure class and a great coach.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Honestbuckeye on December 30, 2017, 11:51:45 PM
Or a turnover chain that should have never come out?

Great season for Big Red. 13 wins for the first time ever and beating Miami for their first home loss is pretty damn good. Being down 14-3 made it even better.

Paul Chryst... Pure class and a great coach.
That was a horrible call, but I knew right then the karma was going our way after!
Way to go Badgers.   What a great job, what a great season!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on December 31, 2017, 01:21:14 AM
I had one too many beers and yelled U Rah Rah and On Wisconsin at a few random problem in UW gear. I regret nothing. 

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on December 31, 2017, 08:03:00 AM
I had one - way too many beers at a retirement party Friday.Tuned in when AH turned into Joe Montana in the 2nd Qtr.Kind of floated in/out after that.Glad Bucky pansed the Canes in front of the home crowd - that should really not be allowed.Canes owe UW a return trip to Madison IMO
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 31, 2017, 10:07:36 AM
great game and great win by the B1G Badgers

I kept yelling for them to run the ball with Jon Taylor, but Horni stepped up
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 31, 2017, 10:09:05 AM
Ouch. I'll try hard not to root against ttun.
Congrats to Wisconsin, great win. Great season. Lots of young talent coming back next season.
I don't usually root for Harbaugh, but when I do it's because I picked them to cover and could win some cash
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 31, 2017, 11:40:58 AM
I had one too many beers and yelled U Rah Rah and On Wisconsin at a few random problem in UW gear. I regret nothing.


Atta boy!!


And Mr N... No chance Miami comes to Madison. Zero.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on December 31, 2017, 11:59:52 AM
apparently Miami has turned Richt into a thug.... which is an impressive feat.  

I despise the 'canes, and their pretense they 'belong', and it was a beautiful thing to see them beat down at home- and by a team i like and respect just made it that much better.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 31, 2017, 12:00:11 PM
Nick Nelson in the locker room after the game...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSWe_dPW4AAumDV.jpg)

And speaking of him.. I'll start an offseason thread now.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on December 31, 2017, 12:03:24 PM
Off-Seaon,UGH trying to put that off as long as possible
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on December 31, 2017, 12:16:21 PM
7-0 B1G!

Michigan will screw it up but 7-1 is still really good!
Hurst is playing and Peters is starting QB. If they lose to a mediocre Scar team that just fired its OC, will be a bit of an embarrassment IMO.
I think Peters has a nice game and Michigan wins. He needs to if he wants to hold onto that QB job going into 2018 bc Patterson is coming in hot to take that job.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 31, 2017, 12:51:01 PM
Nick Nelson in the locker room after the game...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSWe_dPW4AAumDV.jpg)

And speaking of him.. I'll start an offseason thread now.
not the most classy pic, but the Canes probably deserve it
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 31, 2017, 12:54:31 PM
apparently Miami has turned Richt into a thug.... which is an impressive feat.  
should have been tossed
and probably will be next time, I can only assume he wasn't tossed because he has been a class guy in the past
well that and the backlash from tossing the Kentucky RB
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: HailHailMSP on December 31, 2017, 12:56:06 PM
Hate to think about next year already, but the B1G could be scary good.

Wisconsin keeps its large contingent together. Ohio State will reload like always. Sparty has a number of returners. Michigan's defense stays largely intact and they should have competent QB play for the first time the last couple seasons. I think Penn State loses quite a bit, but there shouldn't be a huge drop-off. They are built to last now. And I think it will be one of those years Iowa makes a run for it as well. On PAPER 5-6 potential Top 20 teams. 

The Badgers desperately need Iowa and Michigan to be Top 15-20 opponents or they will face a louder contingent again next year on their schedule. 3 non conference games in Camp Randall against 2 cupcakes, and 1 pushover. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 31, 2017, 01:03:22 PM
From Land of 10:

Wisconsin beat Miami 34-24 in the 2017 Orange Bowl on Saturday, and forced 3 turnovers in the process. The Miami Hurricanes, proprietors of the turnover chain, forced 1. In a 10-point game where the winner outgained the loser by 23 yards, turnovers proved to be the biggest difference.

What does Wisconsin coach Paul Chryst think about that?

Well, here’s what ESPN’s cameras caught him saying on the field after his Badgers won (847's EDIT - there was about a minute left - right after UW made a pick to end the game).



https://twitter.com/cjzero/status/947328871887761408/photo/1


To be sure, we don’t know 100 percent for sure what Chryst is saying there. His hand covers his mouth at just the right time after “turnover chain, my fu-.”


But there’s really not much else he could have been saying.


This is fine. Chryst’s team just won a big bowl game, and it’s fun to celebrate. If anything, this is funny because Chryst is almost comically reserved in his dealings with the media


******************************************************

Wowzers, PC. And he covered his mouth.. Hehe.

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 31, 2017, 01:08:42 PM

The Badgers desperately need Iowa and Michigan to be Top 15-20 opponents or they will face a louder contingent again next year on their schedule. 3 non conference games in Camp Randall against 2 cupcakes, and 1 pushover.
And even with all of that, they have a better resume this season than Alabama does by every rating service worth its salt.

Not much they can do about the helmet thing though.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 31, 2017, 01:19:09 PM
The Badgers desperately need Iowa and Michigan to be Top 15-20 opponents or they will face a louder contingent again next year on their schedule. 3 non conference games in Camp Randall against 2 cupcakes, and 1 pushover.
hopefully, Frosty can turn the Huskers around quickly.  Maybe not top 15, but top 25 would be nice.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 31, 2017, 01:37:59 PM
I finally figured out what Richt was so pissed about:

https://twitter.com/ramzy/status/947279868563218432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F247sports.com%2Fcollege%2Fwisconsin%2FBoard%2F23%2FContents%2FThings-Im-excited-about-112962016



In all honesty, the officials (SEC) were horrible last night for both teams. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 31, 2017, 01:40:55 PM
Dude, ya gotta throw yer arms up and draw attention to the hold
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on December 31, 2017, 01:51:45 PM
Conference bowl records after Orange Bowl:

Power 5

B1G: 7-0
Big 12: 5-2
ACC: 4-5
SEC: 1-3
Pac-12: 1-8

Group of 5

Sun Belt: 4-1
AAC: 3-3
MWC: 3-3
C-USA: 4-5
MAC: 1-4
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on December 31, 2017, 02:00:08 PM
well, that settles it

B1G was obviously the BEST conference this season
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CWSooner on December 31, 2017, 07:02:26 PM
It was a pleasure watching Wisconsin beat down Miami, especially after the Thuggo-caines jumped out to a 14-3 lead.

And I love Chryst's comment.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on December 31, 2017, 08:30:21 PM
Well Bama got yet another injury. At least it’s not a lb. 

Rb Jacobs with hamstring injury in today walkthrough. No idea on severity. He’s 3rd string but plays a good bit. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on December 31, 2017, 09:13:25 PM
And even with all of that, they have a better resume this season than Alabama does by every rating service worth its salt.

Not much they can do about the helmet thing though.
I called BS on espn after OSU's victory. They claimed 'bama had the 4th highest strength of schedule and deserved to be in ahead of OSU. But I thought they had the lowest of any of the top 10.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 09:21:52 AM
I've been calling BS on ESecPN since they got in bed with the SEC. And yes, I DO think they have influence over the playoff committee because all of the games are on their network. Money talks.

Going into the CCG there was "very little separation" between the #5-8 teams in the rankings. And then after the CCG's, during which one of those teams (OSU) beat the #4 team (UW), all of a sudden it was clear that Bama was #4.

Yeah, OK. 

Look at the very bottom of this page, where they show the partner organizations in the playoff.

http://collegefootballplayoff.com/

One of those is NOT like the other.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 11:25:07 AM
C'mon Michigan
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 12:00:07 PM
That had to hurt Sam.After much reflection and in the Spirit of the new year - Go Blffppt,hold on I new at this,GO Blecht,,,wait a second it will come.Okay here it goes - GO BLUE!There I said it :67:
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 12:20:52 PM
4 punts with 10 minutes to go in the first quarter. #Tress
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 12:21:19 PM
That had to hurt Sam.After much reflection and in the Spirit of the new year - Go Blffppt,hold on I new at this,GO Blecht,,,wait a second it will come.Okay here it goes - GO BLUE!There I said it :67:
They have one job
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 12:27:13 PM
I can have good intentions of rooting for a team for all the logical reasons, but sometimes it just doesn't work

I'm happily surprised to say I'm actually rooting the the Blue Boys and it feels OK.

Go Blue
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 12:28:17 PM
HUGE TURNOVER!!!!!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 01, 2018, 12:28:50 PM
Yeesh, both of these offenses are awful
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 12:38:21 PM
and another HUGE TURNOVER
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: utee94 on January 01, 2018, 12:53:37 PM
Back from camping, finally have some time to watch bowl games.

GO BLUE!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 12:59:54 PM
a bit chilly for camping

propane heater was working?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: PortlandSpartan on January 01, 2018, 01:26:09 PM
Lol at thinking peters has shown flashes. These offenses are horrendous 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 01:30:28 PM
Some pretty inept possessions right there.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 01:33:58 PM
big first down on 4th, but then the TO after the first down?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 01:43:07 PM
Today's 1st TD.  Finally.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 01:43:44 PM
UCF first team to score a touchdown today
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 01:44:25 PM
Scott Frost can coach offense
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 01:49:37 PM
If you like conspiracies you night think Stidham is on the take this far.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 01:54:09 PM
mobster with Vegas ties paying him?

he did start at Baylor
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 01, 2018, 01:58:25 PM
Too late to cancel the Peach Bowl and fly UCF to New Orleans to take Bamas spot?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 01, 2018, 01:59:44 PM
https://twitter.com/ESPNStatsInfo/status/947902490250563584
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 02:01:53 PM
does Harbaugh know offense?

or does he simply need an O coordinator and get out of the way?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 02:10:10 PM
does Harbaugh know offense?

or does he simply need an O coordinator and get out of the way?
He's got two OC's, each of which make $1.15 Million Dollars. So, M is paying $2.3 Million for the OC position.

For some perspective, that's what Paul Chryst made last year.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 02:12:26 PM
too many cooks spoil the broth 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 02:15:14 PM
and ANOTHER nice turnover!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: CWSooner on January 01, 2018, 02:16:08 PM
UCF is looking like the better, more physical team than Auburn, and that's without the Knights' QB and receivers clicking at all.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 02:19:43 PM
up by 7 at the half

going toe to toe with the SEC
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 02:27:30 PM
ND and LSU jealous of outback bowl output
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 01, 2018, 02:34:10 PM
they should make an offer to one of Harbaugh's O coordinators
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Kris61 on January 01, 2018, 02:46:53 PM
I've been calling BS on ESecPN since they got in bed with the SEC. And yes, I DO think they have influence over the playoff committee because all of the games are on their network. Money talks.

Going into the CCG there was "very little separation" between the #5-8 teams in the rankings. And then after the CCG's, during which one of those teams (OSU) beat the #4 team (UW), all of a sudden it was clear that Bama was #4.

Yeah, OK.

Look at the very bottom of this page, where they show the partner organizations in the playoff.

http://collegefootballplayoff.com/

One of those is NOT like the other.
What kind of influence?  They paying them off?  I see this alluded to all the time.  What exactly are we accusing the people on the CFP and the execs at ESPN of doing?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 02:50:00 PM
What the Hell is Michigan doing
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: PortlandSpartan on January 01, 2018, 02:50:52 PM
Bama should not have made it. 

It will be hilarious if USC wins this. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 02:58:24 PM
Too late to cancel the Peach Bowl and fly UCF to New Orleans to take Bamas spot?
Nah. Just take Georgia and Bama out and put Big Red and Ohio State in. So there.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 03:00:28 PM
What kind of influence?  They paying them off?  I see this alluded to all the time.  What exactly are we accusing the people on the CFP and the execs at ESPN of doing?
What exactly?

Influencing what is on television later today would be a start.

Payoffs are highly doubtful. I'm not going there and I don't think anyone here has/would.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
Wow, a td in Orlando.   Unimpossible.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 03:02:56 PM
Auburn looking poised here now.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 03:06:57 PM
Gamecocks suddenly unstoppable
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 03:13:17 PM
Here comes O'Korn
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 03:20:49 PM
Peters with a terrible pick to kill Michigan's chance at points
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 03:28:33 PM
UCF ties it up
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on January 01, 2018, 03:36:14 PM
michigan should've kicked that ball away

instead, we get meh Fitz decision 2.0
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 03:36:30 PM
Michigan playing like a wet fart
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: PortlandSpartan on January 01, 2018, 03:36:47 PM
Michigan better hope the next savior works out for em
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Mdot21 on January 01, 2018, 03:39:11 PM
Michigan better hope the next savior works out for em
pretty obvious it's the offensive coaching staff. Drevno and Hamilton have to go.
They don't have a WR's coach. It shows. Collins and DPJ immensely talented but raw.
Jim has no one to blame but himself for this shit show of an offense. He kept Drevno around and he went out and hired Pep Hamilton- a guy that had been fired from every NFL job he's ever had.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on January 01, 2018, 03:42:10 PM
then we get a long pass on 4th and 1 ... ugh

still a great showing by the Big Ten this postseason
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 03:42:46 PM
Goddamit Michigan
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 03:43:51 PM
Switch over to see UCF go up on Auburn
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 03:45:20 PM
7-0 B1G!

Michigan will screw it up but 7-1 is still really good!
Good call. 

Thanks a whole lot, Harbaugh.

THANKS

A

LOT
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ohio1317 on January 01, 2018, 03:47:37 PM
I go and root for Michigan and that happens...

Seriously though, hope next season is better Wolverines.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on January 01, 2018, 04:05:28 PM
not sure if the UCF / Auburn game on ESPN has had longer commercial breaks, a longer halftime or more penalties to hold up the festivities but there is less time left in the LSU / Notre Dame game on ABC ... the latter of which started 30 minutes later ~???
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 04:13:28 PM
Time consuming drives w low scoring has contributed.  I think peach had extra halftime nonsense.   Game didn't kick until 1240ish
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 04:20:22 PM
Shades of Keith Jackson.   Boykin w a helluva catch n run td.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 04:24:19 PM
UCF got the F job on that last BS call. Jeez.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 04:32:36 PM
ND closes the lid on LSU?Can UCF do the same to Aub?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 04:38:14 PM
Said it about 3 weeks ago I thought UCF was a Top Ten team.Might have been on another board but the idea was dismissed.They are,good job Scott Frost - Good Luck 'Skers
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on January 01, 2018, 04:38:21 PM
UCF wins! :)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on January 01, 2018, 04:40:37 PM
just checked ... SEC 2-5 so far this postseason (Mississippi State and S. Carolina)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 04:47:22 PM
Do we really need to talk about how when you have 2 playoff teams, the rest of the bowl slots get the next worst team down? 

And yes, when you have zero playoff teams, you better have a great bowl season, because you're sending teams that are one step up of their slot...
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 04:49:41 PM
How does the Pac 12 exploit that zero playoff team card?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 04:55:10 PM
UCF knocks off the best team in the SEC West
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 04:57:02 PM
How does the Pac 12 exploit that zero playoff team card?
Poorly.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Kris61 on January 01, 2018, 05:00:22 PM
What exactly?

Influencing what is on television later today would be a start.

Payoffs are highly doubtful. I'm not going there and I don't think anyone here has/would.
Then what?  The committee presents its rankings to ESPN and they tell them what they would prefer to see for ratings purposes?  These are successful, strong willed people.  Why would they sign up to do this if they were just going to take marching orders from ESPN?  I don't get it.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 05:02:44 PM
Do we really need to talk about how when you have 2 playoff teams, the rest of the bowl slots get the next worst team down?

And yes, when you have zero playoff teams, you better have a great bowl season, because you're sending teams that are one step up of their slot...
The SEC has feasted on favorable Bowl match ups thru the years.Yes the top two are impressive however
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 05:34:48 PM
Quick scores in the Rose Bowl. Don't think that will last
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 05:48:35 PM
Do we really need to talk about how when you have 2 playoff teams, the rest of the bowl slots get the next worst team down?

And yes, when you have zero playoff teams, you better have a great bowl season, because you're sending teams that are one step up of their slot...
How about we talk about one conference having two playoff teams when it shouldn't have any?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 05:56:04 PM
Quick scores in the Rose Bowl. Don't think that will last
This stopped being the Rose Bowl after the National Anthem and Flyover.

It's just a game now.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 06:03:17 PM
These unis look good in Pasadena.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 06:04:19 PM
Or maybe it will last
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 06:20:25 PM
Anyone hear of defense?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 06:23:14 PM
Anyone hear of defense?
I saw enough earlier today.  I don't want to see any more of that today. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 06:27:08 PM
I saw enough earlier today.  I don't want to see any more of that today.
That was not defense. Just BAD offense.

Except Frost.

Color me worried for the future for UW in the B1G West. UNL will be back.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 06:36:35 PM
Peach was a fun game. I'm enjoying this one too.  Could pull for either side.  D will make some plays here.  Not like the rose has seen good defensive games lately 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 06:45:38 PM
OU is getting by with more holding than any team I've ever seen.  Without it, they're pretty even.  Its stupid. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 06:52:49 PM
WTF was OU thinning doing a pooch kickoff? If they lose by 3... Dumb.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 06:54:08 PM
The SEC chants can be put to bed until at least 2020. When u get exposed like this it's safe to say the committee screwed up. UCF, OSU, Wiscy or someone deserved a shot. SEC has been Bama for 5 years now, and even they are not elite this year. 

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 06:55:24 PM
TD pass to mayfield was tough to defend and ran to perfection
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 06:56:33 PM
The SEC chants can be put to bed until at least 2020. When u get exposed like this it's safe to say the committee screwed up. UCF, OSU, Wiscy or someone deserved a shot. SEC has been Bama for 5 years now, and even they are not elite this year.


Sort of agree but Iowa man
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 06:58:07 PM
WTF was OU thinning doing a pooch kickoff? If they lose by 3... Dumb.

They won't, this Georgia D is exposed. OUs defense is not great, but UGA can't keep up offensively. 

Looking forward to baker vs the Clemson defense, tigers have a chance at slowing them down.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 07:01:50 PM
Hope Baker gets to prove it against Bama.Clemson water boarded the Bucks straight up but the 3 crotch/ass grabs and dabo didn't say shit.Go Sooners
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 07:02:38 PM
Sort of agree but Iowa man
Iowa beat Iowa State. OU did not. Cancel? Or, at least, some lucid thought?


And now... we get.. "marching" bands. Ouch.


I so long for the old days.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 07:03:50 PM
Sort of agree but Iowa man

I would have been fine with USC (pre OSU ass kicking) or UCF. 

I'm not pissed OSU didn't get in, we Scrooged the pooch vs Iowa. 

I think we would have beat UGA or Bama, Clemson and Oklahoma probably not. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 01, 2018, 07:09:09 PM
Poorly.
Zero teams in, two teams in.  Literacy, illiteracy.  Pac 12, SEC.  Crappy conferences come in all shapes and sizes.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 07:22:42 PM
TD Chubb
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 07:27:44 PM
There is that dawg d I've watched all season. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: utee94 on January 01, 2018, 07:46:35 PM
a bit chilly for camping

propane heater was working?
 
Past couple of days, highs in the upper 20s, lows in the teens.  Not cold for YOU of course, but pretty dern chilly down here in Texico.  And yes, propane furnace in the Airstream working nicely. Plus a very, very warm campfire. :)

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 07:50:59 PM
Damn Dawgs score we've got a game
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 07:52:00 PM
Exposed.... Huh... Somebody needs to watch the game a little more. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 08:01:02 PM
Dawgs going in dry nice job OU
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rook119 on January 01, 2018, 08:12:39 PM
you learn a lot in this coaches roundtable thing but I really wish Patterson would let any of the others get a word in
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: utee94 on January 01, 2018, 08:21:43 PM
Exposed.... Huh... Somebody needs to watch the game a little more.
The teams look pretty evenly matched to me.  Close game, all anyone could really ask.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 08:23:19 PM
Exposed.... Huh... Somebody needs to watch the game a little more.
I am. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 08:24:38 PM
I'm thinking the committee got this one right.  The other one, Don't know. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 08:33:45 PM
I'm just happy uga decided to start playing like they have all season.. I could care less if they win or lose, I just want to see both teams playing at the top of their game... As it is, I'm getting just that. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on January 01, 2018, 08:38:02 PM
Awwww Crap. Wife just busted my bubble. 

With TTUN up 19-3 I made date plans to go get coconut shrimp / steak dinner tomorrow. Shipped the kids off to the grand parents, found a gift card we had to Outback. I was ready.

She just walked in and said "Hey, Facebook is saying we get fried onions at Outback tomorrow, don't you hate those?"
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 08:47:43 PM
This is not football. This is crap.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on January 01, 2018, 08:49:11 PM
Just figured out who I'm rooting for in this game:

Not a Baker fan at all, just hate his "fake love, let me rub your face in it" for the game.
And I hate that a very down SEC got 2 teams in.

I've just been grumbling all game.

Then OU's D got the TD, and I said "Boomer Sooner!" Didn't know I was rooting for them till just then.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on January 01, 2018, 08:49:39 PM
This is not football. This is crap.
Ssssplain?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Kris61 on January 01, 2018, 08:53:29 PM
Not sure why anyone wouldn't enjoy watching this game.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 08:57:30 PM
I'd enjoy some defensive displays instead of boat races.Out side of that it's been entertaining
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on January 01, 2018, 09:03:07 PM
I think badger came down with a case of OAM disease, where the sight of offense and especially scoring cause high blood pressure, heartburn, eye twitching, and sometimes aneurysms. Unfortunately once infected with OAM disease one is unable to discern the difference between two very prolific offense playing spectacular (like this Rose Bowl) or defenses just playing like crap.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on January 01, 2018, 09:03:48 PM
he he he
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 09:18:56 PM
Great Game the Heisman Curse rears it's ugly head.....again
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 09:19:22 PM
Great game. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 01, 2018, 09:20:53 PM
Hell of a game.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 09:22:01 PM
Great game.
Nope.

Unless you like the NBA, of course.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 09:28:22 PM
I think badger came down with a case of OAM disease, where the sight of offense and especially scoring cause high blood pressure, heartburn, eye twitching, and sometimes aneurysms. Unfortunately once infected with OAM disease one is unable to discern the difference between two very prolific offense playing spectacular (like this Rose Bowl) or defenses just playing like crap.
Stop it.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 09:30:22 PM
Hehehehee... It wouldn't have been near as high a score if the refs would have called holding when it happened at key locations and times.  

That's two games uga didn't play defense, and they almost lost this one too.. If they do that next week they'll lose for sure. Whomever they play has more experience in the big game and won't play all jittery the first half. 

Ucf is the only team I've seen so far this season new to the bigger games that didn't play like it. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 01, 2018, 09:32:12 PM
Rose Bowl has certainly gotten the disproportionate number of classics recently, compared to the other major bowls, going back to 2005 Texas-Michigan.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on January 01, 2018, 09:34:01 PM
Grand Daddy of them All.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 01, 2018, 09:36:12 PM
Now to Bama Clemson... Funny, for a coach bitching so much about the hunh, saban sure uses it a lot.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 09:38:56 PM
Great game,

I thought Riley got super conservative last 4 drives, 2 reg 2 OT. 

Ur defense sux bro, play to win. Couple first downs with 3 mins to go ices it, 3 timeouts 55 seconds 

Then 3 straight runs in first OT? Easy to 2nd guess, but I thought they were just trying not to make a mistake.

Credit to UGA, their D got torched, but offense showed up

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 01, 2018, 10:00:15 PM
Jeebis this announcing team sux.Ball hit the receiver in the mitts quit making excuses,wasn't the greatest throw still right in the hands.Bimbo sideline reporter states Dabo is playing in his 2nd staight NC Game.Stupid & clueless hey I could use the cash
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 10:03:36 PM
I like blacklidge a lot, he was great with nessler. Not sure how tessatore got this game
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 01, 2018, 10:17:20 PM
Grand Daddy of them All.
It used to be great, just like my Grand Daddy.

Both are RIP.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rook119 on January 01, 2018, 10:18:02 PM
Great game,

I thought Riley got super conservative last 4 drives, 2 reg 2 OT.

Ur defense sux bro, play to win. Couple first downs with 3 mins to go ices it, 3 timeouts 55 seconds

Then 3 straight runs in first OT? Easy to 2nd guess, but I thought they were just trying not to make a mistake.

Credit to UGA, their D got torched, but offense showed up
that 3rd and 2 play call (sweep to the short side of the field) was really dumb. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on January 01, 2018, 10:19:00 PM
Do we really need to talk about how when you have 2 playoff teams, the rest of the bowl slots get the next worst team down?

And yes, when you have zero playoff teams, you better have a great bowl season, because you're sending teams that are one step up of their slot...
This isn’t really accurate mathematically. 
The SEC traded one NY6 game for a playoff. If y’all had one team in the playoff, LSU/South Carolina/everyone else would still be in the same spot. So the B1G is in the same boat. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 01, 2018, 10:28:26 PM
Yeah, thats an all timer of a bad take.  I guess you'd have OSU playing Clemson and Alabama playing USC instead.  Beyond that, no difference.

And we always got laughed down when bringing up that point in the BCS era.  Where it actually matters is not in getting more teams into the CFP, but more teams into the NY6, like a down Big Ten getting four teams in last year, forcing a 7-5 Iowa team into the #2 slot.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 10:33:29 PM
Very enjoyable game.  I like that the Rose can host all kinds of other opponents.  Broadens the game's  appeal.  The whole conf tie in ship sailed decades ago.  Besides the first 30 or so Rose Bowls weren't exactly all Pac v Big.  I respect the devotion and efforts to preserve some of its traditional trimmings, but so long as the P5 wanted to control the whole MNC future something had to give. It's not optimal, but as noted above, the Rose Bowl is still the bomb.

Signed, 
Guy who would still like to see OU v N annually
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 10:53:34 PM
Clemons offense looks slow, predictable vanilla.

And bama is gonna run hurts every play. 

Advantage Georgia 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 10:57:31 PM
Either way, expensive ticket, with probably less than half the crowd needing a hotel.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 11:02:28 PM
The SEC chants can be put to bed until at least 2020. When u get exposed like this it's safe to say the committee screwed up. UCF, OSU, Wiscy or someone deserved a shot. SEC has been Bama for 5 years now, and even they are not elite this year.


No, no....the game is 60 minutes! (and more)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 11:03:58 PM
I was reeeeally hoping OU would pull it out, but whatever.  Once again, the NC will come from the southeast.  I do hate these Big XII type games, though.  It's not even football.  Bama-Clemson might not be as entertaining, but they're both playing football at least.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 01, 2018, 11:07:32 PM
As a big defense guy, I can't believe I'm the one coming to it's defense, but I didn't find the defense played in the Rose Bowl that bad, the offenses we're just that good.  The tackling left something to be desired, but I didn't think it was your typical Big 12 or Pac 12 game with guys just running free all over the field.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 11:12:25 PM
Yeah, um, it's all on the same scale.  You can't play good defense while giving up 50 points.  Oklahoma's defense was garbage all night - UGA averaged 10+ yards per carry ALL NIGHT.  Georgia's D was an embarrassment in the first half, but then fixed things for awhile before falling behind again.

Neither DC is feeling good at the moment, nor should they.  Neither defense combated the run or the pass.  Neither caused multiple turnovers.  They stunk.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 11:13:06 PM
OU offense abused everybody this season.  Uga made some great adjustments up front, tackled better and did benefit from some odd play calls down the stretch.   That was not asu v TT.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 11:13:46 PM
Da'Ron Payne doing his best Charles Woodson impression....at 300 lbs.

Clemson has 100 total yards.  Yeah, Bama doesn't belong, blah blah.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 11:14:29 PM
OU offense abused everybody this season.  Uga made some great adjustments up front, tackled better and did benefit from some odd play calls down the stretch.   That was not asu v TT.  
Yeah, I have no clue what OU was doing on offense in overtime.  It was so odd.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 01, 2018, 11:14:47 PM
Ah shit, pick 6.  Clemson is pooping the bed.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 11:27:02 PM
Clemson has 100 total yards.  Yeah, Bama doesn't belong, blah blah.

They don't belong based on what they did in reg season, and their offense leaves a lot to be desired, but the D is great tonight. They got the magic ticket and they are making most of that opportunity. 

I also think your seeing 2 teams with offensive deficiencies, which makes these 2 defenses look even better.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 11:37:16 PM
I'm content with this beauty pageant format.  I can't look away from the car wreck of osu at Iowa.  I suspect that was the diff.  I said before that is up there w stanford at usc fpr biggest wtf game of all time.  

Clemson D is really good and the
D is doing quite well tonight.    Bama D seems to have benefited greatly from a month off.   Perhaps we should wonder why Clemson is in, despite mauling the canes. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 11:41:22 PM
Bama-Clemson might not be as entertaining, but they're both playing football at least.

This is a hard watch tonight. I love great defense, but this is pretty bad offense too. Another clunker semifinal 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 01, 2018, 11:44:49 PM
Perhaps we should wonder why Clemson is in, despite mauling the canes. 

Nah, Clemson earned it, but their deficiencies are definitely being exposed tonight. Championship caliber defense, but the offense is not there yet
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 01, 2018, 11:55:54 PM
Looking ahead, when was the last time Saban lost to a team w a qb that wasn't a run threat?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on January 01, 2018, 11:57:22 PM
Yeah, um, it's all on the same scale.  You can't play good defense while giving up 50 points.  Oklahoma's defense was garbage all night - UGA averaged 10+ yards per carry ALL NIGHT.  Georgia's D was an embarrassment in the first half, but then fixed things for awhile before falling behind again.

Neither DC is feeling good at the moment, nor should they.  Neither defense combated the run or the pass.  Neither caused multiple turnovers.  They stunk.
It's like offenses are never allowed to be good or gawd forbid - great even. Nope, even if you're playing a Heisman QB behind one of the best OLs in CFB you absolutely better not let them score over 20 or so help me gawd your game will be instantly demoted to the "not football" judgement bin!

Nice to hear from OAM disease's patient zero.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MarqHusker on January 02, 2018, 12:09:29 AM
I love Army's method of winning football as much as anyone believe me, but what makes college foot ball superior to NFL is the offensive variance and innovation.   Whether the NFL likes it or not, the game will become more like the 7 on 7 played in the spring and summer.   I don't enjoy this Bama manhandling of Clemson or UW manhandling of Iowa any less than the Rose Bowl today.   Baker and OU was fun to watch.   I do wish we could see them v Clemson or Bama.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 12:20:26 AM
It's like offenses are never allowed to be good or gawd forbid - great even. Nope, even if you're playing a Heisman QB behind one of the best OLs in CFB you absolutely better not let them score over 20 or so help me gawd your game will be instantly demoted to the "not football" judgement bin!

Nice to hear from OAM disease's patient zero.
The hell?  If a team has a good offense or plays well on offense, cool.  A good defense will negate it, and offensive team will score an average number of points.  A great offense is going to score more than average, but if it hits it's season average or more, then NO, the defense they faced didn't do a good job.
How is that hard to swallow?  How am I being absurd here??  Go ask UGA's DC if he felt successful tonight.  Ask their MLB.  They know they didn't do a good job.
You're defending the allowance of 48 points being a worthy effort and I'm patient zero?  EFF you.

OU averaged 45 points per game this season.  UGA is either the best or one of the best few teams OU has faced this year.  So no, they should not be allowing OU to score over its season average.  No, UGA's defense didn't do a good job.  

OU averaged 45 ppg while playing teams like Kansas, Tulane, and UTEP.  OSU held them to 31.  That was a good effort, good outcome.  Texas held them to 29 points - something to be proud of.

48 points?  In the biggest game of the season?  Garbage.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 12:23:09 AM
Unworthy 4 seed Alabama, after beating #1 Clemson, is an early 4-point favorite over UGA.  

This goes to show that resume is PART of the selection process.  Quality of the team (coaches, roster talent, etc) is also a part of the decision.  This shouldn't be news.

The only teams that could blow out Alabama like Iowa did to OSU are found in the NFL.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on January 02, 2018, 12:30:34 AM
The hell?  If a team has a good offense or plays well on offense, cool.  A good defense will negate it, and offensive team will score an average number of points.  A great offense is going to score more than average, but if it hits it's season average or more, then NO, the defense they faced didn't do a good job.
How is that hard to swallow?  How am I being absurd here??  Go ask UGA's DC if he felt successful tonight.  Ask their MLB.  They know they didn't do a good job.
You're defending the allowance of 48 points being a worthy effort and I'm patient zero?  EFF you.
Another side effect of OAM disease - crankiness/irritability.
You know not every clash of great offense vs great defense will or should result in an average score. I know this may sound crazy but sometimes a great offense will get the better of a great defense, maybe even make a great defense look downright foolish. And sometimes a great defense will shut down a great offense. Neither outcome is more “real” football than the other. That’s why they play the game, they say.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on January 02, 2018, 12:59:35 AM
As an aside, is it safe to say that the upcoming title game will be one of the lowest-rated ever?

Unless u have a dog in the fight, my prediction is that non-SEC fans will likely be unhappy that an SEC team is guaranteed to be the national champion and won't really care about this one

I'll probably have it on in the background but definitely won't be watching every single play with the utmost of attention

I guess I'll be rooting for Georgia just for variety's sake .... also, that Bulldog mascot is a cute little guy (or girl?)
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 01:08:47 AM
Another side effect of OAM disease - crankiness/irritability.
You know not every clash of great offense vs great defense will or should result in an average score. I know this may sound crazy but sometimes a great offense will get the better of a great defense, maybe even make a great defense look downright foolish. And sometimes a great defense will shut down a great offense. Neither outcome is more “real” football than the other. That’s why they play the game, they say.
I know all of that....why are you posting?  I can share my opinion without being......I don't even know what you're doing.  All I said was that both defenses stunk.  I don't enjoy that type of football.  OH NO!  OAM opined!!!  Blast him!!!
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 01:10:16 AM
I know an all-SEC NCG is everyone's nightmare, but can everyone avoid losing their minds?  A minimum of pouting would be nice, too.  At least Bama and UGA haven't played this year, which is nice.  

SDF, I don't know what your deal is, but I'm sure there are better avenues to deal with it.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: nuwildcat on January 02, 2018, 01:42:48 AM
I know an all-SEC NCG is everyone's nightmare, but can everyone avoid losing their minds?  A minimum of pouting would be nice, too.  At least Bama and UGA haven't played this year, which is nice.  
I wouldn't say I'm losing my mind

Hell, I'll give credit where credit is due ... both teams took care of business and definitely deserve to be there

That said, for me personally, it's just more interesting when representatives from different conferences participate in any postseason contest

I do agree the fact Georgia and Alabama didn't play this season does add to the appeal

But to my original point, I'd still prefer a matchup where conference bragging rights are on the line

- this goes for the Big Ten, too

- I'll be the first to tell u I would've HATED a title game that was an Ohio State-Michigan rematch (I forget which year that was) as much as I despised the LSU-Alabama rematch (I think those were the teams and again, I forget which year) ... u had your chance to beat that opponent but if u couldn't, u shouldn't be rewarded for incompetence and someone else should get a shot    
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 01:46:38 AM
You're not losing your mind, I'm just anticipating others.  

This isn't a variety show, it's a playoff.  Settled on the field.  The diversity was potentially there, but OU and Clemson lost, so......I don't know what to tell ya.

Sometimes, the 2 best teams are in the same conference.  Most of the time, they're not.  But as we move from 2 to 4 to 8, the best team is going to win the NC less and less often.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 06:44:45 AM
The BCS would have given us Clemson vs. Oklahoma.

I wonder how many points go up in that one. I'd take OU in that game.

I read (on CBSec) that Bama validated itself as selection #4 by beating Clemson. What a crock of shit.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 02, 2018, 06:47:59 AM
You're not losing your mind, I'm just anticipating others.  

This isn't a variety show, it's a playoff.  Settled on the field.  The diversity was potentially there, but OU and Clemson lost, so......I don't know what to tell ya.

Sometimes, the 2 best teams are in the same conference.  Most of the time, they're not.  But as we move from 2 to 4 to 8, the best team is going to win the NC less and less often.
Helps if you leave out the other conferences.  This was settled on the field.  The B1G was the best, and Central Florida went undefeated and beat the team that beat both of these teams.  The "championship" game is just another exhibition.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 07:51:33 AM
Helps if you leave out the other conferences.  This was settled on the field.  The B1G was the best, and Central Florida went undefeated and beat the team that beat both of these teams.  The "championship" game is just another exhibition.
My sentiment is similar.

SEC teams get mulligans. The rest do not.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 08:12:32 AM
My sentiment is similar.

SEC teams get mulligans. The rest do not.
Alabama is the team that gets mulligans.  Not sure that even Georgia, Auburn, or LSU would get the same benefit of the doubt.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TyphonInc on January 02, 2018, 08:22:08 AM
I am totally a fan of diversity, over conference superiority.
All the teams campaigning for the beauty pageant 4th spot had flaws.

OSU - Iowa wtf? (and didn't have a marquee OOC win to bolster their resume.)
Wisconsin - Lost in final game, helmet not big enough.
UCF - really weak schedule, their 2nd P5 game was hurricane canceled.
USC - on the west coast who watches that? Games not on ESPN.
'bama - lost final game, below average schedule. But, I mean a 4 loss Auburn is head and shoulders above a 5 loss Iowa. Didn't have marquee OOC win to bolster schedule. Mercer. Only 8 conference games.


If no one on paper is clearly better, then I think conference champ / teams from different conference should get the nod over the 2nd (3rd place) team from one conference.

However, all that said; a healed up 'bama is prolly the most talented team this year, and I expect them to maul Georgia next week. But, I prolly find reruns of That's 70ies show or something else equally exciting to watch next Monday.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 08:23:39 AM
I'm not an SEC apologist by any stretch, but the committee did get it right I think.  It could just as easily be Alabama v. Oklahoma in the finals.

But it's not going to matter.  Bama is about to tear UGA a new one.  And the rest of the planet will groan collectively.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 02, 2018, 08:41:52 AM
Unworthy 4 seed Alabama, after beating #1 Clemson, is an early 4-point favorite over UGA.  

This goes to show that resume is PART of the selection process.  Quality of the team (coaches, roster talent, etc) is also a part of the decision.  This shouldn't be news.


So if Alabama loses 3 times they still get in? If Alabama played UCFs schedule it still gets in?

Resume should be priority 1, 2, 3.

Credit to Bama for taking advantage of their opportunity, one that wasn't given to 2015 for example. I mean if coaches, roster talent means something 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MrNubbz on January 02, 2018, 08:48:05 AM
Alabama is the team that gets mulligans.  Not sure that even Georgia, Auburn, or LSU would get the same benefit of the doubt.
This might be but the fact Bama presently puts more players in the NFL every year gives them the benefit of the doubt IMO
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: rolltidefan on January 02, 2018, 09:12:27 AM
I love reading these threads after games. 

Gonna go take a shower and wash the salt off now. 

Happy new year everyone. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: DevilFroggy on January 02, 2018, 09:42:38 AM
I know all of that....why are you posting?  I can share my opinion without being......I don't even know what you're doing.  All I said was that both defenses stunk.  I don't enjoy that type of football.  OH NO!  OAM opined!!!  Blast him!!!
It's like you're new to message boards or something. Yes, you're merely opining that the very sanctity and purity not the game of football is violated and tarnished every time two teams reach a combined score of 50 points. I'm opining that's kinda stupid. Differences of opinion, but that's what message boards are for. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Entropy on January 02, 2018, 10:04:42 AM
Unworthy 4 seed Alabama, after beating #1 Clemson, is an early 4-point favorite over UGA.  

This goes to show that resume is PART of the selection process.  Quality of the team (coaches, roster talent, etc) is also a part of the decision.  This shouldn't be news.


So if Alabama loses 3 times they still get in? If Alabama played UCFs schedule it still gets in?

Resume should be priority 1, 2, 3.

Credit to Bama for taking advantage of their opportunity, one that wasn't given to 2015 for example. I mean if coaches, roster talent means something
I'll watch the FCS championship on Saturday, but my CF season is over.   From the BCS to the playoff, a certain conference gets the second chances others do not...
I've read all the excuses...  when a team loses, quality of wins, strength of conference, eye test...  whatever is needed to ensure someone gets in over others.   I'm not suggesting Bama is a bad team, but that resume at Wisconsin doesn't get them into the playoff.  And that is my problem.   Different rules for different teams.
Maybe this will force a 8 team playoff.... but this really is no different than the BCS beauty contest.
so I will vote by not watching.   Hopefully things change with extremely low ratings. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 02, 2018, 10:14:35 AM
I love reading these threads after games.

Gonna go take a shower and wash the salt off now.

Happy new year everyone.
That's how those Russians felt after the Winter Olympics
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Kris61 on January 02, 2018, 10:19:48 AM
I'll watch the FCS championship on Saturday, but my CF season is over.   From the BCS to the playoff, a certain conference gets the second chances others do not...
I've read all the excuses...  when a team loses, quality of wins, strength of conference, eye test...  whatever is needed to ensure someone gets in over others.   I'm not suggesting Bama is a bad team, but that resume at Wisconsin doesn't get them into the playoff.  And that is my problem.   Different rules for different teams.
Maybe this will force a 8 team playoff.... but this really is no different than the BCS beauty contest.
so I will vote by not watching.   Hopefully things change with extremely low ratings.  
It isn't a conference thing. It's a helmet team thing.  There are still a lot of people who think Ohio St shouldn't have got in in 2014 or 2016. Teams like Ohio St and Bama get the benefit of the doubt.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 11:13:25 AM
I love reading these threads after games.

Gonna go take a shower and wash the salt off now.

Happy new year everyone.
I don't necessarily have a problem with Alabama being in the final 4 - the first 3 picks were cut-and-dry, but someone had to be left out.  OSU got beat by B12 champ OU - at home, and completely wet their pants @ UI.  Wisconsin couldn't get it done in the B1G CCG, but may have been able to sneak in had their schedule been tougher.  USC wasn't really all that close to a playoff berth to begin with, and it showed in the Cotton Bowl.
That said, Alabama's defeat @ Auburn does stick out like a sore thumb, but that's probably a game they'd like to have back.  AU is a good-but-not-great team.  They're terrific at home, but positively awful away from home.  Had the Iron Bowl been played in Tuscaloosa, the Tide would have rolled by 4 scores.
Georgia's a worthy foe and they may well push Bama, but in the end I think Nicky S. shows Kirby how it's done (and I also believe that Kirby will bring the hardware back to Athens one day, probably won't be this year).
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: PortlandSpartan on January 02, 2018, 11:29:30 AM
Bama still didn't deserve to be in. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 11:40:19 AM
Good call.
Thanks.  Never, ever count on the Wolverines.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 11:41:02 AM
7-0 B1G!

Michigan will screw it up but 7-1 is still really good!
Hurst is playing and Peters is starting QB. If they lose to a mediocre Scar team that just fired its OC, will be a bit of an embarrassment IMO.
I think Peters has a nice game and Michigan wins. He needs to if he wants to hold onto that QB job going into 2018 bc Patterson is coming in hot to take that job.
Told ya.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 02, 2018, 11:41:11 AM
Alabama definitely didn't deserve to be in.  All the things we want to see - great wins, conference championships, they didn't have.  But they got in because they are Alabama.  Which is great for them, not so much college football.  Not much point to playing out the season when half of it doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 11:49:22 AM
As an aside, is it safe to say that the upcoming title game will be one of the lowest-rated ever?

Unless u have a dog in the fight, my prediction is that non-SEC fans will likely be unhappy that an SEC team is guaranteed to be the national champion and won't really care about this one

I'll probably have it on in the background but definitely won't be watching every single play with the utmost of attention

I guess I'll be rooting for Georgia just for variety's sake .... also, that Bulldog mascot is a cute little guy (or girl?)
I don't think it will be THAT low rated.  When the BCS put Bama/LSU in I did not watch.  I just didn't care because I thought it was ridiculous.  
This time Bama and UGA earned their way in.  I want to see who wins.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 11:52:57 AM
Wisconsin couldn't get it done in the B1G CCG, but may have been able to sneak in had their schedule been tougher.  
UW's schedule was tougher than Alabama's, and UW won its division and played a very good team as a result.

People complaining about UW's schedule and not mentioning Bama's schedule are just being blinded by the helmet.

NOW

All that said, Bama is a better team than Wisconsin now that it is more healthy. If UW had all of the players it lost this year I think they could give Bama a game. Right now, nope. Bama would stymie them with that front 7, just like Ohio State did.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: ELA on January 02, 2018, 11:56:55 AM
I don't think it will be THAT low rated.  When the BCS put Bama/LSU in I did not watch.  I just didn't care because I thought it was ridiculous.  
This time Bama and UGA earned their way in.  I want to see who wins.  
I'll watch it because come May I'll wonder why I ever even debated not watching the final college football game of the year.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 11:58:44 AM
I love reading these threads after games.

Gonna go take a shower and wash the salt off now.

Happy new year everyone.
Happy New Year and good luck to your team.  
FWIW:  I'm not salty.  I completely understand why my team got left out.  You don't have much to complain about when you lose to a mediocre team by 31 points.  My only gripe is that dumb-a$$ comment that the committee made heading into the CG's about #5 (Bama) through #8 (Ohio State) being very close (or something to that effect).  
You said yourself after that comment was made that you thought Bama was out unless TCU knocked off Oklahoma.  If that comment had been true then #8's win over #4 and associated Conference Championship while #5 sat at home watching CG's on TV should OBVIOUSLY have elevated #8 above #5.  
Everybody knows this already but, CG's:
Based on the statement that there was very little separation between #5 and #8 prior to the CG's it is OBVIOUS that the post CG rankings should have been:
Again, I don't mind that Ohio State didn't get in.  I'm ok with that.  What infuriates me is that they made that obviously false statement.  What bothers me even more is that the favorites won all the CG's so they should have seen this coming.  Why lie when you are EXTREMELY likely to be exposed for it less than a week later?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 12:01:01 PM
I enjoyed the playoff games yesterday.

I will also be watching next Monday evening.  I'll be rooting for the Dawgs

I may be on the road to Texas and miss part of the first half.  If the Sooners were playing Bama I'd probably try harder to see the entire game.

This is what you get with a playoff.  Ya get a team like Bama winning the trophy when their reg. season effort wasn't deserving.  The wildcard out of the SEC gets a trophy and makes the conference another heaping pile of $$$.

will only get worse if the playoff is expanded to 6 or 8.

I'd have rather given UCF a chance, but UCF was no more deserving than Bama, or tOSU, or Wisconsin, or USC
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on January 02, 2018, 12:13:10 PM

After Bama wins the NCG, Georgia fans are gonna be all like...



(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cy8FBVHVEAEGoW1.jpg)

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 12:17:52 PM
Nah. That's for the msu and OM and K-Y fans to chant.

Bama is gonna win. They are the best team today.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 12:19:03 PM
I enjoyed the playoff games yesterday.

I will also be watching next Monday evening.  I'll be rooting for the Dawgs

I may be on the road to Texas and miss part of the first half.  If the Sooners were playing Bama I'd probably try harder to see the entire game.

This is what you get with a playoff.  Ya get a team like Bama winning the trophy when their reg. season effort wasn't deserving.  The wildcard out of the SEC gets a trophy and makes the conference another heaping pile of $$$.

will only get worse if the playoff is expanded to 6 or 8.

I'd have rather given UCF a chance, but UCF was no more deserving than Bama, or tOSU, or Wisconsin, or USC
At least UCF beat Auburn. :57:
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 12:22:16 PM
If Bama didn't deserve to get in, then who did?  UCF?  Ohio State? 

I mean, there's going to be a ton of bitching regardless who got that 4th spot.  I'm sure they gave Ohio State plenty of consideration and the choice was probably really close, but it just came down to the "eye test".  OSU had the tougher schedule, but didn't look good in either of its losses.  Bama's schedule was lighter, and looked very average in the second half of the season, but all comes down to this: 2 > 1.  If the selection committee could help it, they won't ever select a 2-loss team as long as there's a sufficient number of undefeated and one-loss teams from the P5 pool.  They may even pick an unbeaten G5 team over a 2-loss P5 team if the G5 team is A) dominant and B) has beaten multiple P5 teams in the regular season.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 12:26:37 PM
Yup, an 8-team playoff would yield 3-4 SEC teams most years.  Then you all would bitch about that....the never-ending cycle.  Yeesh.  

Some truths:
Wisconsin was never highly thought of....which made OSU's win over them kind of 'meh'
Alabama was ranked 5th and two teams above them lost.  Why is UGA leapfrogging them being ignored?
Alabama was #1 all year and blew out #3 FSU when they were at full strength.

The committee has already included a non-conference champ before, why is this time so damning?
We can include preseason polls or not, but before the season started (or in late OCT, same difference), Alabama was viewed as the best team.  They 'proved' that with their win vs FSU.  

As with anytime the #1 team loses, they move down the rankings.  However, as with any #1 team losing, they then start moving back up to their 'default' position.  Regression to the mean for the #1 team is back up towards #1 (unless they lose).  Believe it or not, this isn't all that much about Alabama at all.  Say USC was number one and lost on OCT 1.  They'd drop down some, but then what?  Would a bunch of teams start leap-frogging them?  No.  They were highly thought of (as per their #1 ranking), and would start moving up gradually as other teams lost.  

The fact that we're talking about the end of the regular season and the fact that big, bad Alabama is from the evil SEC is why it's such a chore.  I wish I could say I'm surprised.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 12:27:15 PM
It doesn't seem to bother any of you for being so predictable and small.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 12:37:31 PM
If Bama didn't deserve to get in, then who did?  UCF?  Ohio State?  

I mean, there's going to be a ton of bitching regardless who got that 4th spot.  
agreed - the issue is that UCF, Ohio St., USC, or Bama - none of them deserved to be included, but it's a 4-team playoff, so they had to pick an undeserving team.  That team happened to be Bama this season
there will always be bitching about the last team in or the last team out, regardless of number of spots in the playoff.  Basketball teams bitch about more than 64 teams.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 12:38:24 PM
Yup, an 8-team playoff would yield 3-4 SEC teams most years.  Then you all would bitch about that....the never-ending cycle.  Yeesh.  

Some truths:
Wisconsin was never highly thought of....which made OSU's win over them kind of 'meh'
Alabama was ranked 5th and two teams above them lost.  Why is UGA leapfrogging them being ignored?
Alabama was #1 all year and blew out #3 FSU when they were at full strength.

The committee has already included a non-conference champ before, why is this time so damning?
We can include preseason polls or not, but before the season started (or in late OCT, same difference), Alabama was viewed as the best team.  They 'proved' that with their win vs FSU.  

As with anytime the #1 team loses, they move down the rankings.  However, as with any #1 team losing, they then start moving back up to their 'default' position.  Regression to the mean for the #1 team is back up towards #1 (unless they lose).  Believe it or not, this isn't all that much about Alabama at all.  Say USC was number one and lost on OCT 1.  They'd drop down some, but then what?  Would a bunch of teams start leap-frogging them?  No.  They were highly thought of (as per their #1 ranking), and would start moving up gradually as other teams lost.  

The fact that we're talking about the end of the regular season and the fact that big, bad Alabama is from the evil SEC is why it's such a chore.  I wish I could say I'm surprised.  
The fairest way to do it is have a 6-team playoff - each Power 5 conference champ and 1 at-large.  Most years it will probably be a one-loss runner-up P5 team or Notre Dame, but based on UCF's performance in the Peach Bowl, maybe an unbeaten G5 team could sneak in every now and then.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 12:38:50 PM
It doesn't seem to bother any of you for being so predictable and small.
would it bother you less if I was unpredictable and large?
I can post in huge fonts
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 12:40:32 PM
The fairest way to do it is have a 6-team playoff - each Power 5 conference champ and 1 at-large.  
what's fair about the 1 at large?
that's what Bama was this season - at large non-con champ
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 12:46:22 PM
what's fair about the 1 at large?
that's what Bama was this season - at large non-con champ
It's fair because at least all power conferences are represented.  If they lose, hey, at least they had the chance to compete for the natty.  Sort of like "well my candidate didn't win, but at least I voted"
And 6 is a much less awkward number than 5 for a playoff.  I guess they can put Notre Dame in the playoff every year and the whole country can watch them get soundly beaten year-in, year-out until they man up and join a conference.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 12:53:00 PM
the awkward number of 3 was what prompted allowing Bama a ticket this season

but hey, gives all of us predictable, small folks something to bitch about

at least they didn't leave out the Big 12 again, THAT would have caused some whining!

fortunately, the PAC fans just don't care enough to cause trouble

and as long as the SEC is happy, everybody is happy
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 12:56:57 PM
It's fair because at least all power conferences are represented.  If they lose, hey, at least they had the chance to compete for the natty.  Sort of like "well my candidate didn't win, but at least I voted"
And 6 is a much less awkward number than 5 for a playoff.  I guess they can put Notre Dame in the playoff every year and the whole country can watch them get soundly beaten year-in, year-out until they man up and join a conference.
I have said for a long time that an expansion to eight teams is essentially inevitable.  Futhermore, I think that when it happens it will be:
This year that would have been:
So your match-ups would have been:
Second round:
Championship:
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 01:02:37 PM
Those complaining about Alabama/Ohio State need to do their research.  In the early Nov committee poll, Bama was #1 and OSU was #9.  You're telling me from that point on the difference between their outcomes was enough for OSU to overtake Bama?  

It's silly.  And hey, at least I didn't use 'deplorable', right?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 02, 2018, 01:06:54 PM
Those complaining about Alabama/Ohio State need to do their research.  In the early Nov committee poll, Bama was #1 and OSU was #9.  You're telling me from that point on the difference between their outcomes was enough for OSU to overtake Bama?  

It's silly.  And hey, at least I didn't use 'deplorable', right?
Yes.  OSU won their conference and Bama won a lot of nothing.  It's not really about Bama - they are obviously a very good team.  It's about making sure the season matters.  Alabama simply didn't do anything on the field to earn a shot in the playoff, and they got there by virtue of being Alabama.  That's great if your Alabama, but sets up a situation where it's unclear what games matter.  Games that don't matter make for terrible experiences as fans.  This year, the playoff is not legitimate, because the committee screwed it up.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 01:16:09 PM
Those complaining about Alabama/Ohio State need to do their research.  In the early Nov committee poll, Bama was #1 and OSU was #9.  You're telling me from that point on the difference between their outcomes was enough for OSU to overtake Bama?  

It's silly.  And hey, at least I didn't use 'deplorable', right?
I don't disagree with Bama being the choice and yet I do disagree with this logic.  In November and December Ohio State beat #12 and #4 and won a P5 Championship.  Bama beat #19 and #16 and lost to #6.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 01:22:41 PM
To be fair, it was screwed up last year too because Penn State should have been in over Ohio State. But that was a B1G-on-B1G screw job. 

This year the B1G champ was passed over for a second place division finisher from another conference. Much different.

What made it worse was the committee chair's comments from one week to the next.

"Very little separation" between # 5 through 8 one week, followed by "Alabama was the clear #4" despite Ohio State beating the previous #4 on a neutral field and the team that beat Bama getting throttled on a neutral field.

Umm... OK.

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Entropy on January 02, 2018, 01:24:24 PM
As I said, the issue is certain teams/conferences have more excuses given to them than others.   This is still the beauty contest that was the BCS.  

either way, some will watch, some will not.   I think the ratings will be low personally.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 01:31:29 PM
As I said, the issue is certain teams/conferences have more excuses given to them than others.   This is still the beauty contest that was the BCS.  

either way, some will watch, some will not.   I think the ratings will be low personally.
Or BCS + 1 format, if you will.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 01:33:23 PM
If Ohio State was #1 and Alabama was #9 in early November, would it be wrong for Bama to overtake OSU?  Sure.  It's too much ground to cover in such a short time, given what each team did.  

All this talk about this being unfair....the most talented team (by stars) with one loss barely made the playoff.  That, in a vacuum, makes sense to me.  I hate UGA and I don't like Bama, but many of you aren't being objective here.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on January 02, 2018, 01:34:52 PM
I created a new thread to discuss the playoff and "fairness". 

My own position is that the two sides, those being the one that wants the "best" teams in the playoffs, and the one that wants the "most deserving" teams in the playoffs, are talking past each other. They're not always the same teams.

Talent-wise and coaching-wise, Bama might be the "best" team in the nation every year. But we wouldn't say that they "deserve" to be in the playoff if they lose 3 close games and don't win their conference. Because they wouldn't deserve it.

So we're arguing over whether a 1-loss team that didn't even play for its conference championship is more deserving than a 2-loss team who won its conference championship. And we're arguing it by trying to claim which team is "better", which is a subjective eye-test metric. 

As long as it's a beauty pageant, we shouldn't even discuss fairness, because beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Whether that's the AP, the collection of polls/computers that made up the BCS, or the committee. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on January 02, 2018, 01:42:41 PM
It's not resume or most talented, it's a combination of both.  

The real issue here is how conferences crown their champions.  16 or 14 or 12 teams - every team doesn't play all the other teams.  In-conference scheduling is wildly uneven, which is the big issue.  

Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 01:52:50 PM
It's not resume or most talented, it's a combination of both.  

The real issue here is how conferences crown their champions.  16 or 14 or 12 teams - every team doesn't play all the other teams.  In-conference scheduling is wildly uneven, which is the big issue.  


2 conferences play 8 games. One of them is where Bama plays and the other one is where Clemson plays. They either need to change that up to play 9, or the others need to go back to 8. That would be a start at least.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on January 02, 2018, 01:54:22 PM
It's not resume or most talented, it's a combination of both.  

The real issue here is how conferences crown their champions.  16 or 14 or 12 teams - every team doesn't play all the other teams.  In-conference scheduling is wildly uneven, which is the big issue.  
That's for each conference to determine. Before conference championship games, the tiebreaker rules in a conference could get all sorts of haywire. Even now, conference division championship can be weird when you have a year like the OSU/PSU/Michigan year where all three finished tied 7-1 in conference play. 
But that's effectively immaterial. It's the conference's job to determine their own champion, even if they do so by reading pig entrails. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on January 02, 2018, 01:55:54 PM
2 conferences play 8 games. One of them is where Bama plays and the other one is where Clemson plays. They either need to change that up to play 9, or the others need to go back to 8. That would be a start at least.
Moot point if they automatically bid every P5 conference champion, is it not? Then we don't have to ask whether a team that plays 8 conference games has a weaker schedule than one that plays 9 conference games. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 01:57:00 PM
Those complaining about Alabama/Ohio State need to do their research.  In the early Nov committee poll, Bama was #1 and OSU was #9.  You're telling me from that point on the difference between their outcomes was enough for OSU to overtake Bama?  

the first poll or the 2nd to last poll don't matter a damn
the only poll that matters is the final poll
and the final poll has absolutely NO reference to any other poll..
in other words, there is no "overtaking"  all teams are voted on once in the final poll.
committee members don't rationalize each movement, up or down, for each team
they simply pick the 4 teams they like best in the final poll.  And then give us their reasoning
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 02:32:54 PM
when you have a year like the OSU/PSU/Michigan year where all three finished tied 7-1 in conference play.
This NEVER happened.  The Wolverines have never so much as tied for a divisional championship and haven't won a conference championship since current freshmen were in kindergarten.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 02, 2018, 02:40:10 PM
That's just cold man. Kicking them when they are down like that and all. Cold.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Entropy on January 02, 2018, 02:40:58 PM
Well, the good news for Georgia and Bama is... whoever loses, they'll still be able to chant S-E-C after the game. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 02:43:50 PM
well, we may have 2 teams from the same conference, but at least they are not from the same division nor is it a rematch from earlier in the season
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 02, 2018, 02:44:22 PM
It's like a bad season of a reality show where the host just makes up rules as they go along.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on January 02, 2018, 02:47:43 PM
If Ohio State was #1 and Alabama was #9 in early November, would it be wrong for Bama to overtake OSU?  Sure.  It's too much ground to cover in such a short time, given what each team did.  
This logic makes no sense to me.  What if Ohio State had a back-loaded schedule and went undefeated through a bunch of cupcakes in September and October then went 1-3 against opposition with a pulse in November.  It would make sense for Ohio State to get overtaken then wouldn't it?  The same applies in reverse.  
Part of this is just the nature of the polls anyway.  #1 in early November is rather frequently nothing more than a team that started high and hasn't lost even if "not losing" isn't much of an accomplishment because they haven't really played anybody.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: utee94 on January 02, 2018, 03:00:09 PM
would it bother you less if I was unpredictable and large?
I can post in huge fonts
This is true.  Absolutely NOBODY can best a Husker fan at posting in BRF.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 02, 2018, 03:07:43 PM
i haven't looked at a line, yet... i would guess bama is the heavy favorite.  

i've said all season since watching Georgia dismantle MSU, that they have hands down the best backfield in the nation.  Bama is right behind them.  I've said UGA has the best starting defensive unit in the nation.  Bama is right behind them.  

the difference is bama has depth galore except at LB.  

I don't think Bama's O is near as good as OU's- and i'd guess UGA's O is every bit as good as Clemson's.  

UGA deserves to be there- their only loss they avenged.  it will be wildly unpopular to say it here, in B10 country, but... AU, for that three week spell, could have beaten anyone in the nation.  They were that tight with all components banging on all eight... they caught both UGA and Bama unaware, and UGA played their worst game of the season.  Bama, however, were playing well (but shorthanded in the LB corps- no, i don't feel sorry for them in the least) when they lost to AU.  UGA played well when they met AU the second time- as most SEC fans who'd payed attention all season realized- but caught an AU with a battered backfield...

proxy is just plain dumb.  it's a rabbit hole.  Using AU as a measure between bama and uga just doesn't work, especially due to health of AU and dumbassedness of UGA their first meeting.  

to be clear, UGA played their second worst game of the season last night.  they were, however, helped tremendously by the zebras.  go back and watch- the holding OU was getting by with in the first half was astounding- and not in unimportant areas, but right there when the ball carrier breezed by... i can't believe it went without comment or notice- but watch it for yourselves.... i was about to post last night that 'the powers that be are ensuring a OU win'... there was one holding call against OU that i'm aware of that came late in the game.  there should have been no less than a half dozen the first half alone.  want to know what happened to UGA's D?  There you have it.  I ain't even going to argue about it because it was real and present, and anyone who isn't a homer should have seen it just as plainly.  understand, i don't have a dog in the fight- bama, uga, ou, clemson- doesn't matter to me one way or the other- just calling it like i see it.  uga was getting mugged last night up until the third- and then they figured out a way to deal with it.  

OU hung 48 on UGA- that was totally unexpected and pretty startling... but Bama ain't OU offensively.  UGA hung 54 on OU... but OU damn sure ain't bama defensively.  

it's my opinion that UGA can hang at least 17 on bama, and bama should be able to hang 21 on UGA.  it's basically a home game for the dawgs, but that shouldn't matter much as it isn't going to be played between the hedges and bama knows that field likely better than UGA- and will have just as many or maybe more fans to rock it..  i'd have to guess there to be a intangible score of around ten to contend with, and it's with great unfortune i'm thinking bama's experience in the big game is enough to steal every one of them from UGA... my brain tells me bama 31 to uga 17, but..... i just plain like the way UGA plays when they are comfortable, and i think they can keep it together... and i gotta call a UGA win... 24 to 17.  furthermore, i figure uga will pull a MSU esqu punch early, and force bama to play from behind- either with a TB streak through the center (those LB's are no match for Michelle, Chub, or Swift) or by hitting isolated flag routes from the outside.  they are good at that, and if a so called 50/50 pass is true, they ought to break off 25~30 a pop until bama moves the safety's up to assist, and then...... the TB streak up the center.  i straight up haven't seen that streak play since early november, but it is something they run to perfection.  

insofar as bama 'deserving' or not..... doesn't matter at this point.  it is what it is.  there are a LOT of writer's and networks that predicted bama since pre-season, and they're going to do what they're going to do to make themselves look smarter than they are.  plus, there aren't a whole lot of teams out there who could beat them if the truth be told.  the team with the greatest chance right now is UGA.  the ONLY team with a chance is UGA. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: bayareabadger on January 02, 2018, 03:26:11 PM
Those complaining about Alabama/Ohio State need to do their research.  In the early Nov committee poll, Bama was #1 and OSU was #9.  You're telling me from that point on the difference between their outcomes was enough for OSU to overtake Bama?  

It's silly.  And hey, at least I didn't use 'deplorable', right?
You are asking me to take early committee rankings as having any value. 
It makes little sense to engage about it because they don’t. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 02, 2018, 03:44:51 PM
It isn't a conference thing. It's a helmet team thing.  There are still a lot of people who think Ohio St shouldn't have got in in 2014 or 2016. Teams like Ohio St and Bama get the benefit of the doubt.

The 2014 team wasn't as good as the 2015 that got left out with 1 loss, so they got screwed, if your comparing to Bama this year. 

But the 2014 team got lucky to be voted in and housed Bama and Oregon.

2016 OSU was the weakest, but by far "deserved" it more than either 2014/2015 teams. 

That's what makes this hard to swallow for most teams, the best? Most deserving? And teams like UCF or Houston that have zero chance no matter what. 

If your Alabama and ur 11-1 your in, no matter who you play or how you look. I'm tired of hearing "Alabamas healthy now" what about teams that had to play with hurt players, had to play 13 games, it's like it's only a factor for Bama. 

Bama is supposedly the deepest team in the country, why does them being healthy even matter when their third string is superior to say UCF?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 02, 2018, 03:53:39 PM
As far as the title game I think UGA has a chance because they are more balanced on offense.

I don't think you have to be a great team to stop Alabama. They have 1 WR, no TE, good but not great running backs and they'll run their qb 20 times. If I'm Georgia I'd be pissed if I gave up over 20 to this Bama team.

UGA just needs to run right at them, hit some play action and don't give Bama a short field with turnovers. 

It might only take 17 to win.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on January 02, 2018, 04:26:02 PM
I as well would like to see a 6-8 team playoff with P5 autobids, but I also believe that the committee has been validated this year. 

Bama looks like they will win it all. 

The two teams that had an argument to get in over them played each other in the Cotton Bowl. OSU had an elite D-Line, but that was about it. And USC was just hot garbage. Wisconsin and PSU were both much stronger opponents than USC. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: fezzador on January 02, 2018, 04:43:21 PM
Bama played lights-out last night, at least defensively.  UGA doesn't have Clemson's defense so I think they can and will be run on, early and often.  I wouldn't be shocked if Hurts led the team in rushing.

Michel and Chubb will probably combine to get ~120 yards on the ground - Bama is wanting to force Fromm to try to beat them.  He won't be able to.

Bama won't do much on offense either, but they won't have to.  Bama has the edge defensively so I think that will set up short fields.  I'd guess they'd win 20-14 in a game that's probably not as close as the final score would indicate. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 02, 2018, 05:14:14 PM
As far as the title game I think UGA has a chance because they are more balanced on offense.

I don't think you have to be a great team to stop Alabama. They have 1 WR, no TE, good but not great running backs and they'll run their qb 20 times. If I'm Georgia I'd be pissed if I gave up over 20 to this Bama team.

UGA just needs to run right at them, hit some play action and don't give Bama a short field with turnovers.

It might only take 17 to win.
you DO have to be a great team to stop bama- without qualification.  good but not great RB's?  they have no less than three sitting on the bench that would start @95+% of other schools... UGA run right at them?  there has been one instance this season where a team found success doing that, and that was MSU (though Auburn did it to a degree because of the outside and passing threat).  
it's fairly evident this board wants to talk down bama, but that isn't reality outside of the board.  bama IS all that.  they're not GODs, but they're as good as any other bama team over the years. though i don't like to see two teams from the same conference anymore than anyone else, but.... it's unavoidable now.  tOSU lost terribly to a team that struggled to put down BC in their bowl.  that can't be overlooked no matter how you shake it.  They also lost to a team at the beginning of the season that is equivalent to the team opposite bama right now, as anytime a team goes into OT all they're proving is their lack of being even marginally better than whomever they played into OT.  
bama lost by 12 to a RIVAL team that caught them in bad shape- no excuse, it happened... 12 to a rival away.. tOSU lost by what, 31? to a team they should have beaten by 21+ if they were so good... dropped a game? sure... but to them? and a second loss?  there is no mercy for a two loss team, especially such an ugly loss. it cost you fans that day in early november, and had less to do with pageant than y'all are suggesting.
as it is.... they got this season right as much as i dislike it.  i dislike that bama, a non-conference champion, got off as easy as they did.. they effectively got an extra week, and since the debacle with utah, saban has rarely been out coached.  time is something they will use to their advantage every time.  it's with great fortune they were likely thinking OU moreso than UGA, because OU is far less of a puzzle for a defense like bama fields than UGA.... UGA is MSU and Auburn combined, both of which gave bama fits.  
but anyway, reading a comment like "run right at them" and "you don't have to be a great team to stop bama" screams that whomever is saying such a thing hasn't really watched bama play- or, they focus on flaws and the rare moments when they goofed rather than when they were taking care of business, which was far more often.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: MaximumSam on January 02, 2018, 05:21:29 PM
Could be a good game, but seems destined to be a low-scoring defensive type fest.  Would have been a great SEC championship game.  Now it's just an also-ran.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: FearlessF on January 02, 2018, 05:33:26 PM
I enjoy low scoring contests and high scoring contests as long as the game is in question into the 4th quarter.
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 02, 2018, 05:45:58 PM
Could be a good game, but seems destined to be a low-scoring defensive type fest.  Would have been a great SEC championship game.  Now it's just an also-ran.  
agreed.  would have been a great conference championship no doubt about it... it is beyond stupid bama made it in.. the only blame to be placed is on a game that happened november 4th- and choose whichever team you want from that event.  i'd much rather see tOSU playing UGA, but.... damn. 
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: TresselownsUM on January 03, 2018, 09:27:03 AM
but anyway, reading a comment like "run right at them" and "you don't have to be a great team to stop bama" screams that whomever is saying such a thing hasn't really watched bama play- or, they focus on flaws and the rare moments when they goofed rather than when they were taking care of business, which was far more often.

let me clarify I guess, or at least try to. I don't mean that you don't have to be a "great team", but I don't think you need a great defense to beat Bama. I don't know many people that think Alabama has a fantastic offense, you're allowed to disagree if you'd like.

The passing offense in my opinion is very average. They do have 1 great WR, but I don't trust Hurts to get him the ball consistently. I think I read the 2nd most catches by any WR on the team is 14 catches? and Bama didn't play a murders row of teams in the regular season, so 14 catches to me seems pretty low. So I would classify this team as fairly 1 dimensional. Now is that 1 dimension good enough to win? Sure, they play Tresselball, great defense, offense don't screw it up, force the other team to get out of their comfort zone. but they only scored 27 on A&M, 31 on Miss St, 14 against Auburn, 24 on LSU, 24 on Clemson. That's enough evidence to me to suggest that Alabama is not going to score 50 on Georgia.

I also tend to think you have a better chance by running "right at bama" vs running on the edges, maybe you disagree with that? but I watched the Clemson game where the CBs were crashing from the sides, I don't think running wide is going to be terribly effective, but if LB is the weakness of the Bama rush D then I think running right at them gives them their best chance. Is Georgias O line up to the challenge, I dunno, maybe it doenst work, but what would you suggest they try? flea flickers?
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: Drew4UTk on January 03, 2018, 10:05:28 AM
MSU and Auburn caught bama weak @ LB... UGA won't.  it isn't the LB's that are the problem per say, it's the DLine, where bama is stacked.  if the OLine they face is great, then they push.  the MSU game is inexplicable, where the Auburn game isn't- Auburn drew the LB's into coverage and off tackle and end- and they ran a few up the gut on them because the LB's in that game weren't fresh.  

usually, unless saban has a reason, he doesn't run the score.  he certainly did on vandy- because he needed style points at that point in the season.  he did on Ole Miss, because it's Ole Miss... those are the only two he ran this season.  he could have on CSU, and Mercer, but he reeled the O in running silly conservative- which is what he does when the game is in control.  He doesn't open up and take risks unless he has to, and the D is usually tight enough that he rarely has to... 

last year Clemson played balls out for four quarters- they soundly beat bama (except for that pick play that actually won the game) and that happenstance is rare... swinney straight up presented a game plan and his players executed with full effort the entire game, and that is equal parts having the plan and having the ponies to produce.  clemson literally played like there was no tomorrow- and beat bama straight up.  just about every other instance of beating bama has involved some sort of surprise element or taking advantage of an obvious shortfall somewhere.  

^all of that can be summed up by saying "bama are masters of removing opponents from their game plan".  IF you can remain in form against bama, they can be beat.  a matter of fact, if you've got the ponies and the plan, i'd wager you've got 45/55 shot of doing so..  the advantage still bama because of that damn bench and keeping fresh players in the game with little to no drop off in performance.  

i hope you realize i hate bama. I fully respect them, though. i'd love to see them soundly defeated.  but realistically, there are few teams that routinely have the plan and the ponies to do it... UGA does (their starting D is as good as Bama's when they play like they can ).  tOSU has the ponies and the plan.  I think Wiscy is capable and i'm pretty sure PSU could do it this year.  Clemson had the components but lacked the plans this season... OU could likely have at least kept up, but i've little doubt they'd have scored their seasons low on them.   this isn't to say that Wiscy could have beaten OU, or tOSU could have beaten PSU a second time- it's more opined on 'style of play'.  and insofar as that 'style' is concerned, I'm thinking UGA has the best 'style' to defeat Bama.  We'll see.  
Title: Re: Bowl Games SoC
Post by: 847badgerfan on January 03, 2018, 10:39:11 AM
UW's biggest fault this year - all year - was starting slow on both offense and defense. They were able to overcome it against everyone but Ohio State. If you look at the stats, it's pretty stark.

UW scored 96 points in the 1st quarter and gave up 68.

226-121 in the 1st half.

247-74 in the 2nd half.

I don't know if they could overcome a slow start against an Oklahoma type that puts up a lot of points, but maybe they could as OU also doesn't play much defense.

Bama would stifle the run game, just like OSU did, and try to make the QB beat them. It would work, now that Bama is healthy in the front 7. Not sure about Georgia because I don't know much about their front 7. Clemson got pushed around up front at times so I think UW could do that too.