header pic

The B12 (XII) Forum, home of the 'Front Porch, y'all' at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.

 (Read 215589 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3234 on: January 24, 2022, 10:06:17 AM »
Louie Mueller is pretty good.  The beef rib is excellent.



FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37520
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3235 on: January 25, 2022, 10:31:29 AM »
it's expensive and worth it!
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2141
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3236 on: February 04, 2022, 09:44:03 PM »
Seeing as how we’re in 2022 does everybody still think OU and Texas still start SEC play this year?  It’s been awfully quiet lately.  Lots of schedule changes coming up and that will ripple across CFB. 

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3237 on: February 04, 2022, 10:03:15 PM »
I would be very surprised if OU and Texas play in the SEC this fall.

I think that's no more likely than 2025 being the year.

But I have no connections whatsoever to people who might be in the know.
Play Like a Champion Today

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3238 on: February 04, 2022, 10:04:11 PM »
Seeing as how we’re in 2022 does everybody still think OU and Texas still start SEC play this year?  It’s been awfully quiet lately.  Lots of schedule changes coming up and that will ripple across CFB.
No, at this point I think if it were going to happen for 2022 it would be announced.

Seems like the attorneys hit some snags they just couldn't work through, so 2023 it is.

Probably not the worst thing in the world for Texas to attempt to fix some of the terribleness before heading into SEC play.  Hope springs eternal, as they say.

longhorn320

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Posts: 9327
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3239 on: February 04, 2022, 10:20:15 PM »
yep If I had to put money on it Id go for 2023

cause they dont want to mess around with OU and UT when setting up divisions
They won't let me give blood anymore. The burnt orange color scares the hell out of the doctors.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3240 on: February 05, 2022, 01:11:46 AM »
yep If I had to put money on it Id go for 2023

cause they dont want to mess around with OU and UT when setting up divisions
Somebody about 3 weeks ago floated a plan where OU and Texas are in different divisions but would be scheduled as interdivisional opponents.
That way, whenever the departure is, it wouldn't require realigning the divisions.
But I too think that 2023 is probably the year.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71536
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3241 on: February 05, 2022, 09:40:17 AM »
I'd guess 2024.  I will be sorry to lose some great OOC games UGA had schedule further out with both teams.  Maybe they can replace them with someone else, though if the league goes to nine game conference slates, I doubt the Dawgs will want to have three P5 OOC opponents as well.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3242 on: February 05, 2022, 11:40:03 AM »
I'd guess 2024.  I will be sorry to lose some great OOC games UGA had schedule further out with both teams.  Maybe they can replace them with someone else, though if the league goes to nine game conference slates, I doubt the Dawgs will want to have three P5 OOC opponents as well.
I'd like 2024.  Georgia @ OU in 2023 is the marquee game for the Centennial of Oklahoma Memorial Stadium.  Getting that game in would be a nice consolation for another year in the Angry Eight.
We've got @ Tennessee scheduled for 2024, the "return" game for the Tennessee @ OU game that didn't happen in 2020.
LSU is scheduled for 2027-28, @ Georgia is scheduled for 2031, and Bama is scheduled for 2032-33.

Selfishly, I hope that the SEC goes to a 9-game schedule.  Every good (for OU) scheduling scheme I came up with after the announcement was made involved 9 conference games.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71536
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3243 on: February 05, 2022, 02:39:11 PM »
With so many teams, they'd need a nine game slate, but I like seeing more OOC games by the top dogs.

UGA has scheduled 3 P5 OOC games starting in the later portion of the decade, and I like that, it means only one pastry.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3244 on: February 05, 2022, 05:46:27 PM »
Seems like Georgia and Bama, have led the way in the SEC in making strong OOC schedules.

Still too many Citadels and College of Charlestons being played, IMO, but the frequency of those games seems to be headed in the right direction--toward "never."

For the most part, OU has only been scheduling 1 P5 OOC opponent over the last couple of decades.  Worse, we've scheduled FCS programs.  I've been hoping to see that improve.

P.S. I would only want more OOC games if they were against good opponents.  I don't care about games vs. Missouri State, Western Carolina, UTEP, Kent State, Arkansas State, et. al.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2022, 05:52:45 PM by CWSooner »
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71536
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3245 on: February 06, 2022, 10:10:32 AM »
Yup, for the most part, an elite team is going to pound FCS or P5 teams about the same.  UGA played UAB last year, a credible G5 team (9-4, beat BYU), and Charleston Southern,  the result being about the same.  

The schedule as set for end of the decade would have three P5 OOC games scheduled including Clemson, FSU, OSU, OU, Texas, and of course Tech, who really is not going to be competitive.  I'd like everyone to play at least ten P5 level teams a year.  I love seeing big OOC games more than most conference games.

Now of course OU and Texas will get reset to something.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3246 on: February 06, 2022, 12:09:36 PM »
Yup, for the most part, an elite team is going to pound FCS or P5 [G5, right?] teams about the same.  UGA played UAB last year, a credible G5 team (9-4, beat BYU), and Charleston Southern,  the result being about the same. . . .
I'm going to disagree with your point.
No matter whether your team is elite or not, playing an FCS team is not about the same as playing a credible G5 team, even though the final scores may be similar.  The difference is in the increased wear and tear your team endures to beat the credible G5 team compared to beating the FCS team.  You may have to have your starters still playing in the 4th quarter against the credible G5 team, whereas they would be resting after halftime against the FCS team.
The score is not the proper metric.  The amount of effort your team had to expend is, IMO.
Playing an FCS team in November is not as restful as having a bye, but it is a chance to give starters a rest and to get injured players healthy.
All that notwithstanding, in my experience, the scores are seldom similar.
To use OU as an example, playing credible G5 Houston is not the same as playing FCS South Dakota. Houston beat OU 33-23 in 2016.  OU beat South Dakota 70-14 in 2019.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71536
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Porch, y'all. pull up a seat and kick back.
« Reply #3247 on: February 06, 2022, 12:59:33 PM »
The UGA starters played one series after the half against UAB.  That might not be a general comparison, but I do think generally whether you play Akron or Charleston Southern, the outcome is pretty much the same, wear and tear the same, etc.  And UGA was starting what had been a fourth string walk on QB as well.  It was 28-0 a minute into quarter 2.  Now there could be more broadly some difference as you note.  UAB probably is quite a bit better than CS.

Scoring Summary

[th]FIRST QUARTER[/th]
[th]UAB[/th]
[th]UGA[/th]
TD
14:22
Jermaine Burton 73 Yd pass from Stetson Bennett (Jack Podlesny Kick)
2 plays, 75 yards, 0:38
07
TD
10:17
Kenny McIntosh 12 Yd pass from Stetson Bennett (Jack Podlesny Kick)
5 plays, 40 yards, 2:30
014
TD
1:14
Brock Bowers 89 Yd pass from Stetson Bennett (Jack Podlesny Kick)
1 play, 89 yards, 0:14
021
[th]SECOND QUARTER[/th]
[th]UAB[/th]
[th]UGA[/th]
TD
14:09
Arian Smith 61 Yd pass from Stetson Bennett (Jack Podlesny Kick)
1 play, 61 yards, 0:36
028
TD
1:13
Brock Bowers 9 Yd pass from Stetson Bennett (Jack Podlesny Kick)
6 plays, 17 yards, 2:48
035


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.