header pic

The B12 (XII) Forum, home of the 'Front Porch, y'all' at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Big XII Realignment

 (Read 17892 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17747
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #126 on: August 05, 2021, 12:38:43 PM »
I like the abbreviated quote better.  Makes him sound more a-hole-y.  :)

Thumper

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 480
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #127 on: August 05, 2021, 05:10:20 PM »
After going from conference board to conference board, one thing is clear.  The SEC did a pre-emptive nuclear strike on all the other conferences.  There is no magical realignment that is going to make things equal for any of the other conferences.
In the Big 12, the best remaining school in terms of value is OSU and they look better than any school the conference could poach (Cincy, Houston, Memphis, et. al).  It looks to me that their best course is to stand pat and schedule tough non cons to get more attention.  Looking at the TV chart someone here provided, I would estimate they could get something like $12-$15 mil per school.  That would be much better than the AAC.  They would be desirable for non-con games for the major conferences.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17747
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #128 on: August 05, 2021, 05:45:33 PM »
After going from conference board to conference board, one thing is clear.  The SEC did a pre-emptive nuclear strike on all the other conferences.  There is no magical realignment that is going to make things equal for any of the other conferences.
In the Big 12, the best remaining school in terms of value is OSU and they look better than any school the conference could poach (Cincy, Houston, Memphis, et. al).  It looks to me that their best course is to stand pat and schedule tough non cons to get more attention.  Looking at the TV chart someone here provided, I would estimate they could get something like $12-$15 mil per school.  That would be much better than the AAC.  They would be desirable for non-con games for the major conferences.

I think the B12 can make it as a conference, but they're going to have to get up to 10 teams if they want to retain their CCG (And the money that goes along with it).

There are some decent options to add, though, that we've already discussed on this thread.

Thumper

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 480
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #129 on: August 06, 2021, 11:17:12 AM »
I had forgotten about the CCG.  It would be a matter if that revenue could offset splitting 10 ways instead of 8.  Anyhow, it'll resolve itself eventually.  

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2150
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #130 on: August 06, 2021, 01:51:20 PM »
Seriously would anybody watch a Kansas State Baylor Big 12 CCG?  I probably would not. 

There is just not much interest in the XII without OU/Texas really. 

On that note and since I'm too lazy to look it up when was the last XII championship game without OU or Texas playing (or both?)?  I realize the game was discontinued for 6-8 years.  Was it A&M/KSU?  My memory tells me it was this:

96  NU/Tx Tx shocks NU
97  NU/A&M  NU blows A&M out and everybody else for that matter
98  A&M/KSU A&M shocks #1 KSU kills their chance at MNC
99  Tex/NU  NU's 1 defeat of Tx as a conference member (game was a rematch)
00  OU/  (cannot remember the opponent but OU won the MNC that year)  I think this game was rematch
01  Tex/CU  CU stuns Tx after Tx beat them earlier
02  OU/ ?
03  OU/KSU (KSU shocked OU in this one)
04  OU / ?
05  TX/CU (Tx didn't let the earlier game repeat!)
06  OU/?
07  OU/?
08  OU/?
09 TX/NEB (the famous 1 second left)
10  OU/?  (I remember this because A&M beat OU but tied for 1st in Big XII South). 
11  Did we play CCG this year?  NU/CU were already gone. 

I really don't know much about the CCG after we left the conference other than it was skipped for awhile until the "one true champion debacle".  I know OU/Tx played each other in one, and I think ISU played OU last year.  Seems like Mizzou was in there a time or two as well but I can't recall the year.  Maybe it was one of the OU/? ones I forgot? 

What teams never played in the CCG?  KU, oSu (they won the conference when CCG was halted), TT, Baylor, TCU,

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6055
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #131 on: August 06, 2021, 03:21:13 PM »
1996: Texas 37, Nebraska 27 - Kept Nebraska from having the opportunity to win its 3rd-straight MNC.
1997: Nebraska 54, Texas A&M 15 - Set up Nebraska's 3rd MNC in 4 years.
1998: Texas A&M 36, Kansas State 33 - Kept K-State from playing for the MNC.
1999: Nebraska 22, Texas 6
2000: Oklahoma 27, Kansas State 24 - Set up OU's BSC championship victory over FSU.
2001: Colorado 39, Texas 37 - Did this keep the previously #3 Horns from playing for the BCS championship?
2002: Oklahoma 29, Colorado 7
2003: Kansas State 35, Oklahoma 7 - OU still got selected to play LSU for the BCS championship, losing 21-14.
2004: Oklahoma 42, Colorado 3 - OU cruised through this, only to get obliterated by USC in the Orange Bowl.
2005: Texas 70, Colorado 3 - Set up Texas' BCS championship victory over USC.
2006: Oklahoma 21, Nebraska 7 - With wins in 6 of the last 7 CCGs, the South Division had established its dominance.
2007: Oklahoma 38, Missouri 17
2008: Oklahoma 62, Missouri 21 - Controversial tie-breaker put OU in the CCG, to go on to play Florida in the BCS NCG, losing 24-14.
2009: Texas 13, Nebraska 12 - Controversial game where 1 second was put back on the game clock, enabling the GW field goal.
2010: Oklahoma 23, Nebraska 20 - Seems like Nebraska led this one about 17-0 at one point.
2017: Oklahoma 41, TCU 17
2018: Oklahoma 39, Texas 27
2019: Oklahoma 30, Baylor 23
2020: Oklahoma 27, Iowa State 23

Teams that have never played in the Big 12 CCG: Kansas, Oklahoma State, and Texas Tech.
« Last Edit: August 06, 2021, 04:09:08 PM by CWSooner »
Play Like a Champion Today

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2150
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #132 on: August 06, 2021, 04:06:40 PM »
Was that all from memory or did you look it up? I am astounded I remembered most of the first ten years pretty accurately.

You left off oSu from the list of teams that never played for the CCG.  

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2150
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #133 on: August 06, 2021, 04:09:44 PM »
Now I will try to remember which games were rematches, correct me if I'm wrong:  

1999
2000
2001
2005
2007 (least sure about this one)


That's all I can remember.  Obviously all the new CCG's were rematches due to the round robin :)  

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6055
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #134 on: August 06, 2021, 04:09:52 PM »
Not from memory.

I fixed the omission.

Certainly don't want to forget oSu.
Play Like a Champion Today

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6055
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #135 on: August 06, 2021, 04:11:59 PM »
2007 was a rematch.
Play Like a Champion Today

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2150
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #136 on: August 06, 2021, 04:12:41 PM »
Not from memory.

I fixed the omission.

Certainly don't want to forget oSu.
It's a god damn shame they missed that FG in 2011 which kept them from playing for the MNC.  That was a fine team indeed, I think Big Matt was still around and mighty proud.  

To me that is the only real difference between a helmet school and a non-helmet school.  The helmet school is allowed one or maybe even two uh-oh's a year and can still get in like OU did in 2003 and Alabama has done more than once.  KSU, oSu, one uh oh or even almost uh oh and it's all over.  

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2990
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #137 on: August 06, 2021, 07:14:05 PM »
Almost certainly correct.

LBM was still around for that.  I believe that's the last season he was here for, and it was a doozy, the regular season culminating in a beatdown of OU that you don't see much.  By the 2012 season he was gone.  

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2150
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #138 on: August 09, 2021, 09:24:14 AM »
I've had some time to reflect on what the XII should do and I really think they would be better served in staying together and trying to get the best of the rest to join and keep the XII a viable conference.  

My reasoning is this:  What good does the money do?  Join another conference if your lucky, maybe the B1G or PAC, but after all these years nothing has changed for ISU or TT or most of the others.  Sure, Baylor I think won a conference championship, I think TCU did.  Maybe they won one at the same time (one true champion right?).  But it was not when OU was strong, Texas was definitely not strong.  Once OU got their groove back it's the same ol same ol.  6 straight Big 12 champs.  And I'm not even sure it was that close looking at the CCG scores.  

Get the giants out, figure out what you can draw in revenue, and make the best of it.  Then maybe you can get lucky like TCU did and find yourself in position to win a Rose Bowl or maybe even another big bowl game where the opponents starters opted out like UF in '20.  I'd much rather be winning in a little  or less presitigious conference than losing in a big one.  Heck you can still schedule some good out of conference games with the big boys and still have something to play for.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17747
  • Liked:
Re: Big XII Realignment
« Reply #139 on: August 09, 2021, 09:33:57 AM »
I've had some time to reflect on what the XII should do and I really think they would be better served in staying together and trying to get the best of the rest to join and keep the XII a viable conference. 

My reasoning is this:  What good does the money do?  Join another conference if your lucky, maybe the B1G or PAC, but after all these years nothing has changed for ISU or TT or most of the others.  Sure, Baylor I think won a conference championship, I think TCU did.  Maybe they won one at the same time (one true champion right?).  But it was not when OU was strong, Texas was definitely not strong.  Once OU got their groove back it's the same ol same ol.  6 straight Big 12 champs.  And I'm not even sure it was that close looking at the CCG scores. 

Get the giants out, figure out what you can draw in revenue, and make the best of it.  Then maybe you can get lucky like TCU did and find yourself in position to win a Rose Bowl or maybe even another big bowl game where the opponents starters opted out like UF in '20.  I'd much rather be winning in a little  or less presitigious conference than losing in a big one.  Heck you can still schedule some good out of conference games with the big boys and still have something to play for. 

Also just like UNC in 2020. :)

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.