header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure

 (Read 464 times)

ManHawk

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
  • Text
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #28 on: November 17, 2025, 01:47:12 PM »
I would prefer an alternative version of history where:

Nebraska joins the Big Ten the same year as Penn St did, 1993.  Big12 forms 3 years early and adds BYU as Nebraska's replacement.

Then change the CCG game rules in 1993 so that you don't need divisions to have a CCG,.  You only need at least 12 teams total.  So the BigTen, Big12, SEC,ACC and Pac all eventually have 12 teams and CCGs with no divisions.  

Then move up the start of the BCS to 1993 so that the 2 best teams are always playing for the national championship.


We are all equal but some are more equal than others.

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2402
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #29 on: November 17, 2025, 02:49:37 PM »
9 conference games, 3 ooc games.  No CCG.

Perfection.
This.

The other part of this post gets in the way, because, I, too, like the 11-team Big Ten of the mid-90s. I liked the Big 12, too--with Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and aTm all in the same place.

But if I were starting from scratch, I would go with 10-team conferences (and promotion/relegation to allow the non-power conference teams a chance to get into a power conference to compete for the major championship).

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25095
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #30 on: November 17, 2025, 02:53:34 PM »
Oh geez here come the soccer dorks with their promotion/relegation ideas. :57:

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2402
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #31 on: November 17, 2025, 03:06:12 PM »
Damn right.

You think Luke Fickell would get another year if Wisconsin was staring at joining the MAC, while Ohio was set to take the Badgers' place in the Big Ten? This ain't AFC Richmond and he ain't Ted Lasso
« Last Edit: November 17, 2025, 03:19:15 PM by SFBadger96 »

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5385
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #32 on: November 17, 2025, 04:09:30 PM »
This.

The other part of this post gets in the way, because, I, too, like the 11-team Big Ten of the mid-90s. I liked the Big 12, too--with Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and aTm all in the same place.

But if I were starting from scratch, I would go with 10-team conferences (and promotion/relegation to allow the non-power conference teams a chance to get into a power conference to compete for the major championship).


You had me until "relegation."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 50503
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #33 on: November 17, 2025, 10:00:02 PM »
So either 10 or 12 teams in the conference is fine, paired with 1997 (or 1991) bowl alignment.
you thought 97 UNL NOT playing 97 Michigan was fine?
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 50503
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #34 on: November 17, 2025, 10:02:34 PM »
I would prefer an alternative version of history where:

Nebraska joins the Big Ten the same year as Penn St did, 1993.  Big12 forms 3 years early and adds BYU as Nebraska's replacement.

Then change the CCG game rules in 1993 so that you don't need divisions to have a CCG,.  You only need at least 12 teams total.  So the BigTen, Big12, SEC,ACC and Pac all eventually have 12 teams and CCGs with no divisions. 

Then move up the start of the BCS to 1993 so that the 2 best teams are always playing for the national championship.
I'm ok with this but, BYU Sucks
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23299
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #35 on: November 17, 2025, 10:48:32 PM »
It would be interesting to collect opinions from CFB fans back in 1992 to see what they thought they wanted.

I'm pretty sure a playoff would have been on that card. 
Well we had 2004 happen (undefeated Auburn left out).  We had a lot of near-misses like that (1997 comes to mind, where both Nebraska and UM were behind undefeated FSU until they visited the Swamp that year).  

I did find a game where Spurrier was asked afterwards about playoff talk, and he advocated for a 16-team, mini-march madness idea, way back in the early 90s.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23299
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #36 on: November 17, 2025, 10:50:14 PM »
Damn right.

You think Luke Fickell would get another year if Wisconsin was staring at joining the MAC, while Ohio was set to take the Badgers' place in the Big Ten? This ain't AFC Richmond and he ain't Ted Lasso
Imagine an Ohio coached by Frank Solich relegating Nebraska from the Big Ten, lol.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4432
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #37 on: November 18, 2025, 06:49:43 AM »
Well we had 2004 happen (undefeated Auburn left out).  We had a lot of near-misses like that (1997 comes to mind, where both Nebraska and UM were behind undefeated FSU until they visited the Swamp that year). 

I did find a game where Spurrier was asked afterwards about playoff talk, and he advocated for a 16-team, mini-march madness idea, way back in the early 90s.
I mean, is 2004 Auburn not a national champion?  They certainly think so…

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 50503
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #38 on: November 18, 2025, 07:12:29 AM »

I did find a game where Spurrier was asked afterwards about playoff talk, and he advocated for a 16-team, mini-march madness idea, way back in the early 90s.
maybe that's why I like old shiny pants
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 34157
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #39 on: November 18, 2025, 07:49:50 AM »
I mean, is 2004 Auburn not a national champion?  They certainly think so…
They have an argument, but they scheduled the Citadel.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 50503
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #40 on: November 18, 2025, 08:16:36 AM »
SEC tradition
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87709
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #41 on: November 18, 2025, 08:59:47 AM »
One where I'm THE GUY with Ultra Deep Pockets and can sit in my luxobox and send word down to the coach/AD about how things should be done.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.