Would everyone be in favor of a "percentage cutoff" - all scholarship athletes must score/rate within X-% of their incoming FR class overall?
That would really hamstring the Stanfords and such of the world. We all know athletes gain entrance with lower scores, but 400+ points??? Football players getting in with sub-600 SAT scores?!?
Is there one person who does this job at each school? A committee? I've heard of coaches jousting with admissions offices before, like at ND. And of course there's tutoring going on, easy classes, etc as well, but those are such long-running things that they're accepted, imo.
But those things would help a student athlete who is somewhat behind his peers academically, not a kid who can't read (which has got to be true of a sub-600 SAT score). Keeping a young person like that eligible would be impossible without improprieties, I think we'd all agree.
Hell, if Vanderbilt is going to act like they're academically superior while getting spanked on the football field, then it needs to hold true. My fear is that there is nearly zero uniformity when comparing admissions offices from school to school. THAT is a problem.