header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Without conference tie-ins...

 (Read 3274 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37407
  • Liked:
Re: Without conference tie-ins...
« Reply #14 on: April 18, 2022, 02:35:27 PM »
Husker's 97 defense was good enough to limit the production of the Griese offense

it would have been a good game, but without some crazy plays, the Huskers win that one
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Without conference tie-ins...
« Reply #15 on: April 18, 2022, 03:31:54 PM »
That 97 UM offense was brutal.  I'm not saying it was bad, but it turned out to be very limiting of itself.  I believe it had only 1 WR among its top 6 pass-catchers.....maybe 2.  That's very rare.
So many passes to RBs and FBs and the TE Tumane (I believe).  That's killing your yards-per-attempt average.  They took the "we have a great D, so our O's job is to not screw up" and ratcheted it up to 11.
It worked for them in all the games they played but I don't know that it would have been enough against the Huskers.  In their game vs tOSU that year (their second closest game, a six point win and arguably the best team Michigan played that year:
  • 10-2 Washington State (Michigan's Rose Bowl opponent) finished #9
  • 10-3 Ohio State finished #12
  • 9-3 Penn State finished #16
  • 8-5 Wisconsin finished with votes
  • 7-5 Michigan State finished with votes
  • 7-6 Notre Dame finished with votes


Ohio State got down 20-0 early in the third then scored two TD's to finish 20-14.  The five TD's in the game were scored by:
  • Two by Ohio State's Offense
  • One by Michigan's Defense
  • One by Michigan's Special Teams
  • One by Michigan's Offense

Box score highlights:
  • Ohio State had more first downs 13-12
  • Ohio State had more rushing yards 119-42
  • Ohio State had more yards per carry 2.9-1.0
  • Ohio State had more net rushing yards 175-97 (the difference between this and total yards rushing is negative plays, mostly sacks)
  • Michigan had more passing yards 147-133 (both figures are pathetic by modern standards)
  • Both teams were dismal in percentage completed but Michigan was less dismal: 14-25 no picks vs 9-26 two picks.  Michigan's slightly over 50% completion percentage would be decent if they had been throwing bombs but they weren't, it was only 5.9 per attempt and 10.5 per completion.  
  • Michigan had more yards per passing attempt 5.9-5.1
  • Ohio State had more yards per completion 14.8-10.5.  Relevant here is that Ohio State had a 56 yard TD pass which accounted for 1/9 of their completions and more than 40% of their passing yards.  
  • Ohio State had more total yards 252-189 (both figures are pathetic)
  • Each team ran 67 plays
  • Ohio State had more yards per play 3.76-2.82
  • Ohio State had 10 punts for 443 yards (44.3 avg), Michigan had 11 for 400 (39.4).  
  • Michigan won turnovers 3-2 (two picks and a lost fumble for tOSU, two lost fumbles for M)

Michigan's offensive numbers in that game are pathetic but . . . they won.  They had one more turnover in their favor (one of which was a pick-6) and Woodson had a Punt Return TD.  


medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Without conference tie-ins...
« Reply #16 on: April 18, 2022, 03:41:04 PM »
Not getting to see Nebraska-Penn St in 94 was really what got me wanting changes to occur in the postseason. That would have been a barn burner.
I'm biased because the Penn State game that I paid the most attention to that year was far-and-away their best game.  Here are PSU's results that year against teams that finished ranked or with votes (in order of final ranking then votes in final AP Poll):
  • Beat #11 Oregon 38-20 in the RB
  • Beat #12 Michigan 31-24 on the road
  • Beat #13 USC 38-14 at home
  • Beat #14 Ohio State 63-14 at home
  • Beat Illinois 35-31 on the road

That tOSU/PSU game was just a catastrophe for the Buckeyes.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37407
  • Liked:
Re: Without conference tie-ins...
« Reply #17 on: April 18, 2022, 05:20:45 PM »
not a meat grinder schedule, but the Buffs were very good and the Canes were tough in the OB.  Here are results that year against teams that finished ranked  in final AP Poll):

Beat #3 Colorado 24-7 at home (Osborne said it was possibly the best game his teams played)
Beat #6 Miami 24-17 in the Orange Bowl - away
Beat #19 Kansas St 17-6 on the road - sophomore walk-on Matt Turman QB


Net Rushing Yards  per game   Huskers 340.0   opponents 79.3
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.