header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?

 (Read 21890 times)

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17160
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #168 on: September 28, 2018, 06:48:44 PM »
I seem to remember a few came into the old board from their home board and they seemed quite affable.Were welcomed then disappeared like yesterdays paper
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #169 on: September 28, 2018, 06:49:30 PM »
I just can't imagine why they might have bailed.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17160
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #170 on: September 28, 2018, 06:54:53 PM »
Dunno it was the off season and game had not been played.Perhaps football in the North East doesn't have the same following as Beisbol or Hoops or real housewives
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #171 on: September 28, 2018, 06:57:53 PM »
The couple/few Rutgers fans we did have (on the old Scout site) were pretty combative/defensive if I remember right. One, I think, was reasonable.



It's OK that they didn't come here. I don't think they'd blend (like their school with all of ours), and they certainly wouldn't like this topic.
Yeah the only downside of this thread is that it's mean, but since they are gone and no one replaced them ...

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #172 on: September 28, 2018, 07:10:37 PM »
It's just funny that we have to walk on eggshells while discussing certain teams due to the overwhelming sensitivity of their posters, while oftentimes those same sensitive posters are quick to deploy the exact same behavior that they were complaining about towards programs less fortunate than their own.

Although the ability to dish it but not take it is hardly unique to these here message boards of course.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #173 on: September 28, 2018, 07:13:17 PM »
If you want to call my school a silly name, have at it. I don't like it, but that doesn't mean it's off-limits. Nobody here ever said that.



I just think you like to pick.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #174 on: September 28, 2018, 07:31:38 PM »
Okay, if Northwestern disappoints me this weekend I'm breaking out the Mildcats.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #175 on: September 28, 2018, 07:40:31 PM »
What about Nebraka? 



What if Nebraka beats Purdue even? Is it then again Purdon't?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #176 on: September 28, 2018, 07:53:05 PM »
Yeah, I wasn't trying to single you out, you were just the one that posted before I jumped in. I've been admonished for using Purdon't before, even though I said it because I was rooting for them to pull off the upset, and I was disappointed that they blew it in the waning moments. 

There's also a certain Michigan poster who will throw an absolute sissy-fit if you take even the slightest jab at that program. Of course that account is the poster boy for a fella that can dish it but not take it. 

Overall though, I say we all get along pretty well for a group of people that come here specifically to discuss college football with a bunch of rival fan bases. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37555
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #177 on: September 28, 2018, 07:55:34 PM »
name calling as been around a few centuries
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #178 on: September 28, 2018, 08:20:57 PM »
It's just funny that we have to walk on eggshells while discussing certain teams due to the overwhelming sensitivity of their posters, while oftentimes those same sensitive posters are quick to deploy the exact same behavior that they were complaining about towards programs less fortunate than their own.

Although the ability to dish it but not take it is hardly unique to these here message boards of course.
By all means say the same thing without pronouns or stand-ins. The truth is that everyone here is hypersensitive in the right moment and tries to be cool in all the others. Which is just like people. Not a group of them but all of them.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #179 on: September 28, 2018, 08:24:31 PM »
Overall though, I say we all get along pretty well for a group of people that come here specifically to discuss college football with a bunch of rival fan bases.
This is precisely why, when presented with the opportunity from @Drew4UTk , I decided to invest in this place and also bring ELA in on the action. I just wish we could get more people to come, so we could make ends meet. The Amazon thing is helping, for sure.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37555
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #180 on: September 28, 2018, 08:26:15 PM »
I purchased a vacuum for my daughter

shipped today
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18864
  • Liked:
Re: Who would you realistically replace Rutgers with?
« Reply #181 on: September 28, 2018, 10:31:38 PM »
Here's what would have happened.
NOTHING.
You know why?  Nobody cares about Rutgers.
Baylor covered up for murder and numerous rapes BY THEIR ATHLETES and nothing happened to them.  
I assume all major college football teams are guilty of numerous rapes every year.  
All you need is the age group, the numbers, booze, and bad decisions and there you have it.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.