Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

Several big European countries have already banned internal combustion engines. It may not be happening as fast as expected, but electric cars are still the future, and I think the same is still true for buses and small commercial vehicles. The biggest variable is when autonomous technology is deployed, after which car ownership will inevitably become obsolete, anyway. What happens for freight transportation is still certainly an open question, though.

2018 numbers of generation share is 63.6% fossil fuel, 19.4% nuclear, and 16.9 renewables (including hydro).... Renewables have probably gained another 1-2% over the past year. Of course, it varies by part of the country with higher levels of renewable generation in the West Coast, Great Plains, and Southwest compared to the Northeast and Southeast.

https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3

Freight as in rail freight could be electrified over time.  The engines today are already electric, it's just that they use Diesels to provide the electricity.  Electric motors are an effective means to deliver torque to the wheels gradually and effectively, no wheel spin now.  One could modify these engines with pickups overhead to shut down the Diesel where power is available.

Airplanes of course are another story entirely.  The wife was checking how to get from Paris to Marseilles the other day and told me that flying our of Orly was cheaper than the TGV, and faster.  She later said we probably would not make that trip for other reasons.  Sometimes the airport of course is out of the city when the trains drop you off inside like Gare du Nord versus CDG.

The trains in France have been largely shut down by a general strike, we're hearing it is a real mess right now, and she wants to go into the city one night.  Yuck.  We're driving, traffic may be worse than normal.  I do not care for Paris.

I don't think any have banned them as of now.  They have plans to move away from them in the future, but not today.  I'm headed to France later this month and I'm 100% sure to get a Diesel rental car.  Paris has some pretty bad air pollution at times and I know the city plans to ban Diesels in the future, they can't  ban them today except they are moving the cabs away from them, a lot of the cabs are Priuses.

Norway sales are over half EVs now because they pay much lower taxes and tolls.  That's an interesting way to promote EVs, you don't pay tolls.  The freeways intercity in Europe are largely toll roads and they get expensive in a hurry.  We spent nearly $100 on tolls driving from Lyon to Bordeaux if memory serves.  Might have been $70.

So, effectively, the Norwegian government is subsidizing EVs.  They are removing the burden of paying for road from the "good people" (EV owners) and transferring it to the "bad people" (IC-car owners).  And, as EVs are more expensive (otherwise there wouldn't be the need to subsidize them), this is effectively a regressive tax.

Several big European countries have already banned internal combustion engines. It may not be happening as fast as expected, but electric cars are still the future, and I think the same is still true for buses and small commercial vehicles. 

I don't think any have banned them as of now.  They have plans to move away from them in the future, but not today.  

Yeah, it's a common thing that I see... When a country puts in a policy that is long-dated, which allows them to claim to have done something today even though the requirement to make it happen is down the road and may get canceled if the economics don't line up. 

https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/denmark-eu-ban-gas-diesel-cars/

Norway will end the sale of new cars that use fossil fuels in 2025, while used cars will still be permitted. It assumes remaining cars with internal-combustion engines will gradually be phased out. The Netherlands will enact a similar plan, but with a 2030 timeline. France and the UK have called for total bans by 2040.

Norway, because of the dramatic incentives* they've already created for EVs, might actually hit that 2025 goal, but I won't be completely shocked if it gets extended a few years if it's not economically viable. 

But for France and the UK, making a policy with a 20 year timeline allows politicians to hog all the glory of their forward-thinkingness today, while pushing the actual potential pain of the policy out far into the future when nobody will remember who was responsible. 

* And by incentives for EVs, I basically mean that they've made it so ruinously expensive to buy an ICEV that simply not applying those taxes and penalties to EVs makes them cost-effective in comparison. They artificially make ICEVs so expensive that not applying the same policies looks like a dramatic subsidy to EVs. 

by 2040 I probably won't give a damn

The truth is that BEV won't make it until it's economically viable to make it. There are several things that need to happen:

• Cost of batteries need to come down. Right now it might be true that it's cheaper to "fill up" using electricity than gas, but the cost of batteries mean that you have a much higher acquisition cost today of a BEV vs gasoline vehicle. Right now it's still a purchase almost entirely limited to upper-income purchasers.
• City charging infrastructure needs to improve. The ideal, of course, is residential charging. But as a renter, I don't want to pony up ~$1000 to install a charger in my landlord's garage. A lot of apartment complexes don't have chargers or only have limited chargers today. So this is limited mostly to homeowners, or people who are by nature the BEV early-adopter types that would be willing to do this. 
• Highway charging infrastructure is important as well. Tesla leads here, but on highly-traveled routes [particularly in places like California], you can still run into multi-hour wait times during busy travel times [such as the holidays]. Now, for a multi-vehicle family, or if you choose to rent an ICEV for a trip like that, you can get around it. But again that means that you need to have higher income than many families to make it viable.

This stuff is all going the direction of increasing BEV adoption. But it's going to take years, and until it gets there, it will be a plaything of upper-income and multi-vehicle households who can deal with the higher initial acquisition costs. Many of those households are also homeowners and the types that might use home solar and home battery energy storage to dramatically reduce their home electricity AND automotive "fueling" costs. But not yet mainstream.

I'll be really interested in how it progresses by about 2026-27 or so. At that point my eldest will be heading off to college and it might be right around time to replace the main family-hauler with something a little smaller. I may look into the jump to BEV around that time.

The truth is that BEV won't make it until it's economically viable to make it. There are several things that need to happen:

• Highway charging infrastructure is important as well. Tesla leads here, but on highly-traveled routes [particularly in places like California], you can still run into multi-hour wait times during busy travel times

are these charging stations not standardized for all electric vehicles?