header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.

 (Read 212749 times)

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 20068
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2296 on: May 17, 2025, 01:24:12 PM »
Hmmm. If cities matter, why can’t Houston fill a stadium?

The University of Houston is a big public school in a big Texan city. Maybe Houstonians just don’t like football very much. Or maybe all of this is a question about schools, not local populations.
Same as PITT-Pittsburgh easier to draw from a whole state/region than a municipality
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”― Douglas Adams

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22402
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2297 on: May 17, 2025, 01:35:12 PM »
Same as PITT-Pittsburgh easier to draw from a whole state/region than a municipality
Houston is a commuter school.

USC is the most popular brand in a massive state, a college blueblood, located in one of the largest cities in the USA.

These are not even remotely comparable.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83415
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2298 on: May 17, 2025, 01:47:31 PM »

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31339
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2299 on: May 17, 2025, 01:53:23 PM »
UH is a commuter school. Their own alumni don’t even care about UH.
It's like UI-Chicago then.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31339
  • Liked:
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22402
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2301 on: May 17, 2025, 01:55:23 PM »
I'm not sure I agree with Kirby on the first point.  Within the same position group, if a senior is better than the incoming freshman, he'll be paid accordingly.  If he isn't paid accordingly, then he'll leave for someplace that will pay him.

On his second point, he's absolutely right.  A lot of schools are likely to start cutting sports in order to make payroll.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83415
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2302 on: May 17, 2025, 02:02:27 PM »
I'm guessing entering freshmen are getting lucrative offers to sign at some university, while the seniors already there might never have had an NIL deal when he was a frosh.

But, generally speaking, NIL has some issues.  So does the portal.  So does football.

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3448
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2303 on: May 17, 2025, 07:30:35 PM »

Newsflash…Kirby Smart doesn’t like free markets. 

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21850
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2304 on: May 17, 2025, 10:52:45 PM »
I'm flabbergasted that the Dallas Cowboys weren't once mentioned in that whole conversation.

It's not just about Saturday, it's about a weekend.  SMU and TCU are 'other' programs for several reasons, one big one being the Cowboys own most football fans' wallets in the DFW area and far and wide around Texas itself.

The LA teams have had NFL teams off and on, which isn't "good" for pulling fans/$$$ away.  So USC and UCLA don't have that excuse. 

But again, I find it odd for the CA teams to build huge stadiums 100 years ago, even if they sold out for a game, season, or even a decade.  None of them have had sustained sellout crowds, a la a Nebraska (no one has), Texas, Florida, OSU, or even a South Carolina.

Sure, Stanford had 94,000 in 1935 for their game against Cal, but the very next season, averaged 25,000 per game.  That's A LOT of empty seats for a lot of years.  Perhaps that's why they eventually demolished it and build a stadium with half the capacity.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12112
  • Liked:
Re: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.
« Reply #2305 on: May 17, 2025, 11:56:00 PM »
The Texans are keeping the Cougars down. 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.