header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The Death of College Football - Realignment, NIL, Portal, Etc.

 (Read 86412 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17755
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #770 on: August 08, 2023, 09:38:22 AM »
Mizzou was already in the SEC when Rutgers was invited
Mizzou always wanted to be in the B1G, though.  I think they'd have gone ahead and made the jump if invited.  No exit fees in the SEC.

But that's beside the point. There was never a "Mizzou vs. Rutgers" discussion in the B1G League Office, because Mizzou doesn't get you into the NY market where you can try and force the BTN onto every cable subscriber's lineup.  


LittlePig

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1369
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #771 on: August 08, 2023, 09:42:58 AM »
Mizzou was already in the SEC when Rutgers was invited
That is true,  but if the Big Ten knew in 2012 that Mizzou was next on its list to add,  they could have proactively added Mizzou in 2012.  But since the Big Ten had decided its next move was going east, they essentially passed on Mizzou.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37707
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #772 on: August 08, 2023, 09:48:58 AM »
if I remember properly, Mizzou publicly begged the B1G for an invite.
This is what got UNL's attention and Osborne decided to investigate.
For whatever reason, the Big Ten didn't want Mizzou.  (maybe Iowa or Illinois had issues?)
The B1G obviously jumped at the chance to add UNL. 
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14379
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #773 on: August 08, 2023, 09:50:52 AM »
if I remember properly, Mizzou publicly begged the B1G for an invite.
This is what got UNL's attention and Osborne decided to investigate.
For whatever reason, the Big Ten didn't want Mizzou.  (maybe Iowa or Illinois had issues?)
The B1G obviously jumped at the chance to add UNL.
yup. Nebraska was a phenomenal addition. just like Penn State was and USC is. helmet brands = $$$.

hate the basterds but ND would be a huge add for the B1G. 

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17755
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #774 on: August 08, 2023, 09:54:16 AM »
It is a testament to the domers' fierce dedication to independence (and their pig-headedness), that they are not a member of the B1G.


Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14379
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #775 on: August 08, 2023, 10:00:05 AM »
It is a testament to the domers' fierce dedication to independence (and their pig-headedness), that they are not a member of the B1G.
those dorks are still holding a 100+ year old grudge against Michigan and have refused to join the B1G on multiple occasions all because Michigan's Fielding Yost hated catholics and refused to play ND again for years after they beat him I think once and he tried to keep B1G schools from scheduling them and successfully kept blocking them from joining the B1G.

It was like 100+ years ago. Get over it domers.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25414
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #776 on: August 08, 2023, 10:12:12 AM »
One B1G school voted NO on Oregon and Washington.

WISCONSIN.

They were fine with Washington, but they wanted Stanford over Oregon. Like way more.

The other 13 schools F'd this up royally.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14379
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #777 on: August 08, 2023, 10:17:46 AM »
One B1G school voted NO on Oregon and Washington.

WISCONSIN.

They were fine with Washington, but they wanted Stanford over Oregon. Like way more.

The other 13 schools F'd this up royally.
kinda blows my mind Michigan, OSU, and Penn State all voted yes to Oregon....a school that continually beats them for 'croots on the trail.

Plan of action should've been to bury those johnny come lately fks and leave them out in the cold and force them into a dogshit conference like the MWC and then you'd never have to worry about losing a recruit to them ever again...

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8923
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #778 on: August 08, 2023, 10:24:14 AM »
One B1G school voted NO on Oregon and Washington.

WISCONSIN.

They were fine with Washington, but they wanted Stanford over Oregon. Like way more.

The other 13 schools F'd this up royally.
Not that I don't trust you, but I'd be interested to read more, do you have a link for this?

Good job Wisconsin, can we make King Barry our Commissioner and allow him retroactive power to change this recent decision?

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37707
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #779 on: August 08, 2023, 10:32:00 AM »
It was like 100+ years ago. Get over it domers.
1925: Husker Victory, Hostilities Temporarily Ends Series
Nebraska Shocks ND 14-0



Notre Dame's visit to Nebraska in 1925 was a landmark game for the Huskers for several reasons. The Nebraska win evened up the eleven game series between the two schools, and it also marked the end to the rivalry for many years.

Coach Knute Rockne's Irish squad was once again the envy of college football. Having won seven games, and tying one - five of those by shutout, the Irish were poised to claim the Western title. That is if they could dispatch a pesky Cornhusker squad.

Hopes were high as thousands of fans made the long train ride West for the game. By game time, 45,000 people crammed into a Memorial Stadium designed to hold only 38,000. To accommodate the demand, benches were installed along the sidelines and temporary bleachers were erected behind the end zones.

Despite their powerhouse status, Notre Dame knew they had their work cut out for them. Gone were the Four Horsemen. The Notre Dame hopes were left on the shoulders of a young squad of eager players. Nebraska, meanwhile, boasted several highly experienced players including All-American Ed Weir, Joe Westoupal and Choppy Rhodes. To make things tougher for Notre Dame, Rockne continued his practice of starting the game with his second string players. His plan was to keep the game tight long enough to wear down the opponent, then hit them with a fresh line of first teamers. Rockne's plan backfired early in the game.

Just four minutes after the opening gun sounded, Nebraska had registered the game's first score. After Nebraska's Weir pinned Notre Dame back to their own 4 yard line with a punt with a massive 58-yard punt, Notre Dame was unable to get the ball out of danger and quickly turned it back over to Nebraska with a poor punt that only went three yards. Two plays later Rhodes took the ball in for the score.

The Nebraska fans went crazy, rocking the overflowing stands. But the Husker fireworks weren't finished yet.

Later in the period, quarterback John Brown tossed a 32-yard touchdown pass to Avard Mandery. Suddenly the Huskers had a 14-0 lead on the mighty Notre Dame team.

As the second period started, Rockne sent his first team players, Henry O'Boyle, Gene Edwards, Tom Hearndon and Rex Enright into the backfield. His star players put up a heavy attack but managed only a failed drop kick attempt for any offensive punch. At halftime the 14-0 Husker lead stood.

In the second half, Nebraska stayed with their plan. Strong runs into the line continued to wear down even the freshest of Notre Dame players. Brown and Rhodes pounded away to move the Huskers down to the Irish 17-yard line where Weir place kicked a 25-yard attempt for three more points. The Memorial Stadium fans were sent further into hysteria.

The Nebraska defense stood tall for the rest of the game. At the final gun, the Huskers had upset Notre Dame 17-0 claiming just their 4th win of the season, but gaining their fifth win over Notre Dame.

The defeat was bitter for Notre Dame, and as a result, the events that followed the game burned even deeper. Notre Dame officials claimed they were peppered with an ongoing assault of anti-Catholic taunts from the Nebraska faithful. Taunts that they said had gone too far. Knute Rockne himself bristled at the comments made in various newspaper accounts of the contests over the past few years and took it upon himself to write scathing letters to the paper's editors.

In the face of the ongoing friction and the decreasing payouts that Notre Dame was receiving for their trips to Lincoln, the Notre Dame athletic board made the recommendation that Nebraska be dropped from the 1926 Notre Dame schedule. Rockne considered that action to be too harsh. Although the gate receipts were declining over the years, he still needed those funds to pay for his athletic department. Rockne argued vehemently that the Huskers remain on the schedule. Plus Rockne still had a score to settle after losing the 1925 match. In the end, however, Vice President Finigan canceled the 1926 Nebraska game and ended any negotiations for further contests.

Rockne tried several times in the years following to restore the trips to Nebraska but each effort failed. It would be another twenty-two years before Nebraska and Notre Dame would meet again.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

jgvol

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4905
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #780 on: August 08, 2023, 10:44:27 AM »
That is true,  but if the Big Ten knew in 2012 that Mizzou was next on its list to add,  they could have proactively added Mizzou in 2012.  But since the Big Ten had decided its next move was going east, they essentially passed on Mizzou.

The B1G can retroactively add Mizzou for all I care.

They bring zero to the SEC, and are bad fit.  They are our Rutgers.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14379
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #781 on: August 08, 2023, 10:45:41 AM »
The B1G can retroactively add Mizzou for all I care.

They are bring zero to the SEC, and a bad fit.  They are our Rutgers.
we'll trade you Rutgers for Mizzou. 

jgvol

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4905
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #782 on: August 08, 2023, 10:49:13 AM »
we'll trade you Rutgers for Mizzou.

I don't hate Mizzou that bad.  

Y'all already tried to pawn Schiano off on my Vols.  One of the greatest fan revolts of all time.  Fans do have some power, apparently.

jgvol

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4905
  • Liked:
Re: UW and UO to Big Ten ~ Memorial Day?
« Reply #783 on: August 08, 2023, 10:50:42 AM »
kinda blows my mind Michigan, OSU, and Penn State all voted yes to Oregon....a school that continually beats them for 'croots on the trail.

Plan of action should've been to bury those johnny come lately fks and leave them out in the cold and force them into a dogshit conference like the MWC and then you'd never have to worry about losing a recruit to them ever again...

^^^ my kind of poetry right there.  Right on.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.