I don't think Germans as a people are any more "bad" than anyone else. It shows how humans can be deceived given certain conditions. I've read a number of books about how Hitler rose to power, it's a bit frightening, more than a bit, to me. There was a confluence of conditions necessary, the Great Depression was one factor, the loss of WW One was a factor, the Reichstag fire was a large factor, I suppose they would have staged something similar had that not occurred.
I think the Germans in 1933 largely thought "Anything has to be better than this". Hitler told them things they wanted to hear, basically that Germany didn't really lose WW One, they were a superior people, and he generated a lot of public works projects with considerable fanfare to put them to work, initiated high tariffs on imports, convinced the wealthy folks like Krupp he didn't like communists who they viewed as a significant threat. When a country is really down, they will more likely go along with an extremists, especially one who appears to be making good on promises and controls the media.
I think it's something of a misnomer to call them WW One and Two, it was a World War with an intervening period of 20 years or so, one leading to the other. Once Russia was knocked out of WW One, the French COULD have approached the Kaiser about some kind of deal. The front had not changed in years, men were dying in droves, the war was pointless and about to get worse. The US entry, which Germany basically engineered, may have been the thing keeping the French involved. But the US in 1917 had a tiny army, it would take a year to become significant.
I figure had the French asked for a negotiated settlement in 1917, Germany would have withdrawn from most of France in return for concessions, certainly keeping Alsace and Lorraine and their overseas colonies, something close to status quo ante.
Anyway, I find it amusing suppositions.