Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

They'll consider money, money, and money, ....

Clemson?

Take USC, Stanford, Oregon and Washington from the PAC.

Take Miami and FSU from the ACC.

It's out there that Warren wants to get to 24.

ND, UVA, UNC and GT round that out.

That's not even a conference anymore.  It's a giant cluster of teams who say they're in the same conference.  There wouldn't be any meaningful similarity of schedule tying them together.  

That's not even a conference anymore.  It's a giant cluster of teams who say they're in the same conference.  There wouldn't be any meaningful similarity of schedule tying them together. 

The SEC will do the same thing by poaching ACC and Big 12 schools.

It's out there that Warren wants to get to 24.

Warren is involved, but it is the television networks who control realignment, subject to approval of the university presidents.
This is somewhat reminiscent of when the AFL started out. In the early 1960s the AFL attracted some good players but most noteworthy players went to the NFL. The NFL was on CBS. The AFL was on NBC. I presume that as the AFL started to get more fans, and more money from NBC, better players could be brought in. Following the 1966 season the competing leagues created the AFL-NFL Championship Game to create more interest and make more money. Because the leagues were separate and competing against each other in separate drafts for players, the NFL did not want to give the AFL legitimacy. I am sure the TV networks had something to do with creation of the first Super Bowl. In fact CBS and NBC each broadcast the AFL-NFL Championship game which later became known as the first Super Bowl.
Can you imagine a model for a playoff in college football that pits the Fox Sports/NBC/CBS football teams against the ESPN/ABC football teams? We could have these big 24-team conferences aligned with their TV network(s) who each run their own playoff to determine who plays in the championship game. 
A 24-team conference seems unwieldy.

The SEC will do the same thing by poaching ACC and Big 12 schools.

Don't see many teams there that add value, other than Texas and Oklahoma, which we're already getting.  The point would be the same though....why even bother calling it a conference?  Several geographically close or historically linked schools will play each other and then somehow sort out who wins the "conference."  It won't be very different than what we have now with bowls/playoffs.  

Don't see many teams there that add value, other than Texas and Oklahoma, which we're already getting.  The point would be the same though....why even bother calling it a conference?  Several geographically close or historically linked schools will play each other and then somehow sort out who wins the "conference."  It won't be very different than what we have now with bowls/playoffs. 

Agree.

For 8 more in the SEC, it might look something like this - assuming my projected B1G targets were to come true:

WVU
VT
NCSU
Dook
Clemson
TTU
oSu
Kansas