header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: UCLA and USC

 (Read 48574 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #924 on: August 24, 2022, 08:51:22 AM »
For many of those, the numbers are skewed based on who they are playing.

People are gonna watch Bama play College of Charleston, but they won't watch Arky play College of Charleston.

The B1G East and SEC West get boosted here, simply due to the quality of programs in those divisions.
Yeah, I've actually seen analyses that do a better job of isolating the dependent variables, and the order/rankings shift around a bit. 

But even so, the raw numbers do tell the general story.  The numbers for the B1G East and SEC West are high, because a lot of people want to watch several of those teams play football.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25278
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #925 on: August 24, 2022, 09:06:49 AM »
Yeah, I've actually seen analyses that do a better job of isolating the dependent variables, and the order/rankings shift around a bit.

But even so, the raw numbers do tell the general story.  The numbers for the B1G East and SEC West are high, because a lot of people want to watch several of those teams play football. 
Right.

Don't get me wrong, my school does bring some eyeballs, but last season they played Penn State, Michigan, Notre Dame and Nebraska. That's a big bump.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37586
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #926 on: September 13, 2022, 08:48:32 AM »
if it wasn't all about football revenue...............

The University of Virginia has moved up in the annual rankings of colleges and universities published by U.S. News and World Report.

UVA rose to the No. 3 spot among public universities in the 2023 Best Colleges ranking, after three consecutive years at No. 4. In the rankings, released today, UVA is tied with the University of Michigan. The University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of California, Berkeley are tied for the top position among public universities.

Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are the top two institutions overall.

UVA remains the 25th-best university overall for the second year in a row, after climbing two spots in the 2021 rankings. It is the highest-ranked university among all Virginia institutions, public or private.

In the overall category of graduation and retention, combining those related metrics, UVA is the top public university in the country and ranked No. 11 among all public and private universities.

U.S. News considers six factors in its ranking, including “outcomes” like graduation and retention rates. UVA continues to have an excellent first-year student retention rate of 97%; the graduation rate is 94%. Again this year, UVA graduated 90% of its Pell Grant recipients, whose family incomes are typically less than $50,000 a year.

In other U.S. News rankings, UVA is among the best schools for veterans, staying at No. 9 again this year. U.S. News also ranked UVA’s undergraduate business program eighth in the country. It found UVA has the No. 15 public undergraduate nursing program.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37586
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #927 on: September 22, 2022, 08:22:38 PM »
The road to the Big Ten might have gotten even tougher for UCLA. First, the board of regents said it could stop the move, and now, Pac-12 commissioner George Kliavkoff is getting involved.

Kliavkoff sent a three-page letter to the University of California Board of Regents to explain why the board should block UCLA’s move from the Pac-12 to the Big Ten, according to a report from The New York Times’ Billy Witz on Thursday. In the letter, Kliavkoff laid out multiple reasons why UCLA didn’t fully think through the consequences of the move, which was announced June 30.

Kliavkoff cited multiple factors in his letter, which The New York Times obtained, including travel time and how travel costs could soar to as much as $23 million if UCLA continues to charter flights. He also said the departure could affect Cal because of the Pac-12 media rights deal.

In addition, Kliavkoff said although it’d be a “heavy ask,” he said “for the current and future generations of UCLA student-athletes, we would strongly support a decision by the UC Board of Regents to reverse the decision made by UCLA.”
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

GopherRock

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2436
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #928 on: November 16, 2022, 03:44:19 PM »
This mess isn't over. The UC Board of Regents weighs in tomorrow.


https://twitter.com/achristovichh/status/1592909738073010176?s=20&t=efzC5EUDEwyqQWu4lvfN8Q

Abba

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 995
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #929 on: November 16, 2022, 03:57:02 PM »
Swap in Stanford, Washington, or Oregon and call it a day.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20346
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #930 on: November 16, 2022, 04:14:13 PM »
Swap in Stanford, Washington, or Oregon and call it a day.

GopherRock

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2436
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #931 on: November 16, 2022, 04:29:37 PM »
Stanford and Washington.

Oregon doesn't belong anywhere near this discussion. 

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #932 on: November 16, 2022, 04:31:23 PM »
Delaney should have his retirement revoked for Maryland/Rutgers and I/many said it at the time.They brought no more eyes on the conference(or very Little) and anyone wanting to watch the BIG Teams already had the package.What has Maryland brought hoops wise?
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #933 on: November 16, 2022, 04:32:42 PM »
Stanford and Washington.

Oregon doesn't belong anywhere near this discussion.
Really,none of them belong near this decision
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37586
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #934 on: November 16, 2022, 04:47:19 PM »
cancel the deal

we don't need any stinkin trojans
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20346
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #935 on: November 16, 2022, 04:48:53 PM »
we don't need any stinkin trojans
You are starting to sound like your dad

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37586
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #936 on: November 16, 2022, 04:49:41 PM »
really don't need the bruins
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: UCLA and USC
« Reply #937 on: November 16, 2022, 05:11:42 PM »
we don't need any stinkin trojans
You are starting to sound like your dad
Well he didn't mention Beavers,so.....
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.