Yeah, there's a lot of filler when it comes to college football coverage.
Personally, I'd like it to include more deep-dive stuff from the past, maybe tying it in to a player or team from the current season, something like that. But the endless bowl predictions and other drivel must get clicks (I assume), otherwise they wouldn't do it.
It's more a lost opportunity than anything. Is there anything more useless than a website's own rankings? The AP and Coaches polls are already irrelevant, but ESPN and CBS et al think we need their try at it? Is it a race to the most irrelevant?
I understand us doing it - we're not doing it for mass consumption, but for each other.