One cool thing from the BJ Historical Abstract for baseball was that a team made up of the 30th-best at each position would definitely win its division each year and be highly-favored to win the WS, but a team of the 70th-ranked guys would be the lower-limit on probably winning their division at all.
I think I have that right. Something like that.
.
You'd think, or at least I did, that the 70th-best at every position EVER on one team would still be VERY strong...but it's not.
I wonder if that would be similar for college football. Way more teams, even if it's just P4/5....but at 70th-best, you'd basically be having the worst best player at a school's position. If that makes sense. Like Wake Forest's best-ever DT, Oregon State's best-ever TE, etc.
That's still a great team, right?