header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: The CFP Era so far

 (Read 13099 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71908
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #154 on: January 01, 2020, 06:57:23 AM »
That would be funny.  Decades ago, some girl broke up with me and it was the end of life as we know it, and I went to a bar to meet a buddy who also had a relationship go south.  I think we competed all night over who had it worse.  I think I won, but I can't even remember the girl's last name now.  She was pretty irresistible & cute though

The drinking age was 18 when I was in college.  I went summers and got out before I was 20 (my birthday is late in the year).  I went to NC and couldn't legally drink, bummer.  I also learned the bars there did not serve liquor, only beer/wine.

I get carded here in stores, I know to get out my license now and show it every time.  I really do not look younger than 21 at all.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71908
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #155 on: January 01, 2020, 07:01:07 AM »
SEC: Alabama: 5, Georgia: 1, LSU: 1, Total: 7
ACC: Clemson: 5, Florida State: 1, Total: 6
Big Ten: Ohio State: 3, Michigan State: 1, Total: 4
Big XII: Oklahoma: 4, Total: 4
Pac 12: Oregon: 1, Washington: 1, Total: 2
Independent: Notre Dame: 1, Total: 1


Who might be the next team most likely to make an appearance?  

Auburn, nobody, Michigan?, Texas?, USC? by conference.  The Pac has been left out 4 of 6 times, is that a trend that will continue?  Penn State has a shot, they get OSU at home next year.  I cannot see another ACC team making it in the next 5 years.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7869
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #156 on: January 01, 2020, 07:29:53 AM »
Who might be the next team most likely to make an appearance? 

Auburn, nobody, Michigan?, Texas?, USC? by conference.  The Pac has been left out 4 of 6 times, is that a trend that will continue?  Penn State has a shot, they get OSU at home next year.  I cannot see another ACC team making it in the next 5 years.
Honestly probably Texas.

That’s based on the fact OSU and Clemson’s grips on their league’s are pretty tight. Maybe Auburn breaks through, but getting past Bama and LSU remains mighty tough. USC is, I think, still more wobbly than Texas despite the 7-5 record.

i think some new team will be ahead of Texas in making it, but that’s more about taking the field than anything else.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71908
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #157 on: January 01, 2020, 07:38:52 AM »
USC and Texas are both "interesting", Blue Bloods going through a down phase.  Obviously, a great coach can fix that in 3-4 years.  Recruiting might be the factor that indicates who might get back first.  That would favor Texas.  They were #3 in 2019, USC was #20, but the year before the teams were #3 and #4, so USC has some players.

Texas is WAY ahead thus far in 2020.  The Big Ten might have the highest chance of someone else getting in.  I agree that "the field" is most likely, Utah could have made it this year somewhat out of the blue.  




utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17755
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #158 on: January 01, 2020, 10:50:33 AM »
Heh!  As we've debated before, Texas could have been the better matchup.
Yes, I know the point that Texas fans would rather travel to San Antonio to see UT play UU than travel to Orlando (or wherever) and see UT play ND.
Still would have been a better matchup.
7-5 Texas a better matchup than 7-5 Iowa State?

In name only, I suppose.

But the point I was making, is that I'd expect a 10-2 Notre Dame team, to get matched up with some team-- any team-- with a record closer to their own.  Certainly better than 7-5.  It must be a result of their odd bowl deal with the ACC, if that was the best available to them.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25403
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #159 on: January 01, 2020, 10:52:59 AM »
Screw ND.

That is all.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71908
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #160 on: January 01, 2020, 10:53:31 AM »
Yeah, usually 10-2 plays 9-3 or 11-1, not 7-5.  We had several 2 loss teams "playing down" this year, and one of them lost.  ND and Florida basically rolled, and ND-Florida game would have gotten good ratings I suspect.  The CG losers are playing each other in two games.  Wisconsin of course gets a conference champ.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71908
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #161 on: January 01, 2020, 10:54:51 AM »
I don't feel the same antipathy for ND as some of course.  I don't really dislike any program today.  Miami has faded from that "status" in my mind.  I don't even mind Eastern Michigan these days.  Got over that a long time ago.


utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17755
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #162 on: January 01, 2020, 11:01:08 AM »
I still have a healthy dislike for Notre Dame.

Only programs I "hate" are Texas' rivals OU and Texas A&M.  Plus Miami, screw those guys.  

But it's just "football hate" since I can't imagine hating someone for real, based on their school of choice.  Heck, I married an Aggie after all.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71908
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #163 on: January 01, 2020, 11:04:02 AM »
Which is the most disliked program today among fans?  A quick answer would be Michigan, because Ohio State has so many alumni.

But, discounting rivals, would it still be Miami?  ND?  Eastern Michigan?


MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17187
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #164 on: January 01, 2020, 11:06:09 AM »
 I don't even mind Eastern Michigan these days.  Got over that a long time ago.
What's with EM?
I get carded here in stores, I know to get out my license now and show it every time.  I really do not look younger than 21 at all.
 think it's protocol,about once a month same-same,and I look like Al Bundy does now 
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17187
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #165 on: January 01, 2020, 11:13:04 AM »
I'm currently watching a couple Western directional programs
I know W.Kentucky beat W.Mich. 23-20
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17755
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #166 on: January 01, 2020, 11:13:46 AM »
Which is the most disliked program today among fans?  A quick answer would be Michigan, because Ohio State has so many alumni.

But, discounting rivals, would it still be Miami?  ND?  Eastern Michigan?



I'm sure Alabama has climbed the ranks recently.  People are tired of seeing them win so much, plus Saban isn't a very likable guy from the outside.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8923
  • Liked:
Re: The CFP Era so far
« Reply #167 on: January 01, 2020, 01:31:31 PM »
USC and Texas are both "interesting", Blue Bloods going through a down phase.  Obviously, a great coach can fix that in 3-4 years.  Recruiting might be the factor that indicates who might get back first.  That would favor Texas.  They were #3 in 2019, USC was #20, but the year before the teams were #3 and #4, so USC has some players.

Texas is WAY ahead thus far in 2020.  The Big Ten might have the highest chance of someone else getting in.  I agree that "the field" is most likely, Utah could have made it this year somewhat out of the blue. 
I think USC is most likely simply because they have the easiest path. Any SEC team has to get past Bama. Any ACC team has to get past Clemson. Any B1G team has to get past tOSU. Any B12 team has to get past OU. USC has to get past . . .

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.