header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Stirring the Pot

 (Read 35762 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #294 on: October 09, 2018, 12:42:44 PM »
Jack and Makers are two of the Bourbons I sip on the rocks

not a Jim Beam fan, but it's OK.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #295 on: October 09, 2018, 05:40:56 PM »
Not to be "that guy" but Jack Daniels isn't bourbon. Just sayin'... :)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #296 on: October 09, 2018, 05:44:02 PM »
Dude,

You are most assuredly "that guy"

but then of course, I'm the other guy
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71547
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #297 on: October 09, 2018, 05:48:00 PM »
Not to be "that guy" but Jack Daniels isn't bourbon. Just sayin'... :)
It is not labeled as bourbon, but could be, according to the rules of what makes something bourbon.
I don't think the "filtering" step disqualifies it.
I don't care for it at all personally.  Gentleman is somewhat quaffable for me.  It's big in France.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71547
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #298 on: October 09, 2018, 05:51:08 PM »
I just got an email on my old account telling me I should buy hurricane insurance, all this number.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #299 on: October 09, 2018, 06:42:44 PM »
call Flo
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #300 on: October 09, 2018, 08:02:42 PM »
It is not labeled as bourbon, but could be, according to the rules of what makes something bourbon.
I don't think the "filtering" step disqualifies it.
I don't care for it at all personally.  Gentleman is somewhat quaffable for me.  It's big in France.
It's always been labeled as Tennessee Sourmash Whiskey.  Not bourbon.  They take pride in that.  That's kind of the point. :)
It's certainly made like bourbon and tastes like some bourbons.
But it's not.

Temp430

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #301 on: October 10, 2018, 05:56:08 AM »
Johnny Walker only sold red and black label until relatively recently.  It makes me wonder if  all that product diversification and general rise in popularity of Scotch has cut into the quality of the red and black.  Red was considered a much better than average Scotch for over 50 years.
A decade of Victory over Penn State.

All in since 1969

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #302 on: October 10, 2018, 07:07:13 AM »
I dunno. I picked up a bottle of JW Blue probably 25 years ago, and drank green (no longer made) for a good while too, and gold from time to time. They were not easy to find, but they were around. Green was replaced with platinum, I think. 
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Temp430

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #303 on: October 10, 2018, 07:18:14 AM »
Wikipedia indicates Johnny Walker blue first available in 1992.  Which is recent for old farts like me.
A decade of Victory over Penn State.

All in since 1969

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #304 on: October 10, 2018, 08:25:18 AM »
Wikipedia indicates Johnny Walker blue first available in 1992.  Which is recent for old farts like me.
I'm probably not that far behind you, although the more I post here the more I realize there are a lot of oldies (but goodies) here.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71547
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #305 on: October 10, 2018, 08:25:51 AM »
I was at a party where they were pouring JW Black, which I had not had before.  I guess it wasn't to my taste, though I didn't think it was bad.

I think Armangac is underappreciated.

https://vinepair.com/wine-blog/brandy-differences-between-cognac-armagnac/

As it is less well known, it is often less expensive for the same quality as Cognac.

https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/charles_neal/posts/armagnac-an-in-depth-look-at-the-regions-grapes-styles-and-producers

It's interesting that all this stuff is made from what can be called "pot stills", though they are not usually stirred.

I did a lot of distillation "back in the day", heh.  You can only distill ethanol to 190 proof (95%) without doing something special to get higher.

The "absolute ethanol" is hygroscopic, e.g., it sucks water out of the air to get to 95%.  It can have a small amount of residual benzene in it which you really want to avoid.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17150
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #306 on: October 10, 2018, 09:44:55 AM »
I forget what the story was when some years back Pappy Van Winkle went under.Evidently they had barrels sitting around in a warehouse(s).I guess the same distiller who bought out Weller,bought out Pappy also and Weller somehow got some of Pappy's stash - so it was much prized or the story goes .It was some high falutin' Bourbon snobs told me the story whilst we were sipping and sampling a relatives stash at Holiday Party
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Stirring the Pot
« Reply #307 on: October 10, 2018, 10:13:31 AM »
Johnny Walker only sold red and black label until relatively recently.  It makes me wonder if  all that product diversification and general rise in popularity of Scotch has cut into the quality of the red and black.  Red was considered a much better than average Scotch for over 50 years.
same with high end tequila and others back in the 70s and 80s
it may have been around on the east coast or in large cities like Chicago, but I didn't see it around here
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.