header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas

 (Read 771089 times)

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5807
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14700 on: August 10, 2021, 05:54:11 PM »
HonestBuckeye,

you are correct that no one knows how the vaccine could affect someone years and years from now, but this article seems reasonable to me.
Perhaps it's a politically motivated piece of garbage?
Seems reasonable and data driven.  From what could learn- VERY low odds of negative long term effects for pregnant woman and child.  I just can’t equate the decision of a well informed lady to choose not getting the vaccine during pregnancy to the crazy shit like the microchip nuts. Especially when, as our Purdue friend points out- due to the spike protein the vaccines  are new.
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14701 on: August 10, 2021, 05:57:43 PM »
due to the spike protein the vaccines  are new.
Huh?
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14702 on: August 10, 2021, 06:00:53 PM »
I was talking in general. There was (and still is) a lot of pushback in the EU.
I read a headline a day or so ago stating that the EU had caught up the the US vaccination percentages
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14703 on: August 10, 2021, 06:04:20 PM »
Seems reasonable and data driven.  From what could learn- VERY low odds of negative long term effects for pregnant woman and child.  I just can’t equate the decision of a well informed lady to choose not getting the vaccine during pregnancy to the crazy shit like the microchip nuts. Especially when, as our Purdue friend points out- due to the spike protein the vaccines  are new.
I understand a lady being hesitant and I'm not shaming her or thinking poorly of her decision.  Sorry
I'm speaking more to the physician and "others" in the medical field that should be able to communicate the way a vaccine works and how very low the risks are long term
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14704 on: August 10, 2021, 06:04:40 PM »
I read a headline a day or so ago stating that the EU had caught up the the US vaccination percentages
Yup.  France has caught up to us.  UK, Germany,  Spain, Italy, have all surpassed us.

« Last Edit: August 10, 2021, 06:12:35 PM by utee94 »

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14705 on: August 10, 2021, 06:10:33 PM »
where in the wide world of sports did people get the idea that there might be long term consequences?

where did this misinformation come from?
Common sense?I mean look at all the horseshit commercials every little problem has some trumped up title. But If people can have lactose intolerance or deadly reactions to be stings or peanuts or what ever it stands to reason this vaccine could have a very undesirable conclusion amongst a few - I know of one
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12222
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14706 on: August 10, 2021, 06:11:06 PM »
Seems reasonable and data driven.  From what could learn- VERY low odds of negative long term effects for pregnant woman and child.  I just can’t equate the decision of a well informed lady to choose not getting the vaccine during pregnancy to the crazy shit like the microchip nuts. Especially when, as our Purdue friend points out- due to the spike protein the vaccines  are new.
I get that...

But I think that my discussion about the psychological aspect is an interesting one.

A pregnant lady can choose to get the vaccine or not get the vaccine. But in the world in which we live, that pregnant lady most likely CANNOT choose whether or not she's going to get COVID while pregnant. 

But that pregnant lady most likely doesn't think about the potential long-term effects of COVID infection on her unborn child because she's not choosing to get COVID. 

The proper way to make the decision would be to look at the potential negative effects of the vaccine * 100% (because you're choosing the vaccine and you know whether or not you'll get it) balanced against the potential negative effects of COVID * the likelihood of contracting COVID naturally

But nobody really knows the likelihood of contracting COVID naturally, as it's dependent on a whole bunch of factors, personal behavior notwithstanding. So most people in the calculation never look at the right side of the ledger because "I'm sure I won't get COVID in the next 9 months!"

I think the issue is that people underestimate the likelihood of getting COVID, because they all think they're being MUCH more careful than they actually are. Just like 90% of people think they're above-average drivers. 

When you balance the decision using only the left side of the ledger, caution is always the best policy, because you're not accounting for the danger on the right side. 

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5807
  • Liked:
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14708 on: August 10, 2021, 06:14:48 PM »
I get that...

But I think that my discussion about the psychological aspect is an interesting one.

A pregnant lady can choose to get the vaccine or not get the vaccine. But in the world in which we live, that pregnant lady most likely CANNOT choose whether or not she's going to get COVID while pregnant.

But that pregnant lady most likely doesn't think about the potential long-term effects of COVID infection on her unborn child because she's not choosing to get COVID.

The proper way to make the decision would be to look at the potential negative effects of the vaccine * 100% (because you're choosing the vaccine and you know whether or not you'll get it) balanced against the potential negative effects of COVID * the likelihood of contracting COVID naturally.

But nobody really knows the likelihood of contracting COVID naturally, as it's dependent on a whole bunch of factors, personal behavior notwithstanding. So most people in the calculation never look at the right side of the ledger because "I'm sure I won't get COVID in the next 9 months!"

I think the issue is that people underestimate the likelihood of getting COVID, because they all think they're being MUCH more careful than they actually are. Just like 90% of people think they're above-average drivers.

When you balance the decision using only the left side of the ledger, caution is always the best policy, because you're not accounting for the danger on the right side.

Reminds m of this scene :)



FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14709 on: August 10, 2021, 06:15:55 PM »
Common sense?I mean look at all the horseshit commercials every little problem has some trumped up title. But If people can have lactose intolerance or deadly reactions to be stings or peanuts or what ever it stands to reason this vaccine could have a very undesirable conclusion amongst a few - I know of one
yes, but these types of effects are mostly within a couple months of getting the vaccine - not something that would crop up years from now
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14710 on: August 10, 2021, 06:19:59 PM »
https://www.floridatoday.com/story/life/wellness/2021/08/10/heres-how-different-covid-19-vaccines-work/5518442001/
August is National Immunization Awareness Month, which highlights the importance of recommended routine vaccines in your life.

it's the 10th, why have I not heard of this?

I always hear about national cupcake day or national margarita day
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14712 on: August 10, 2021, 06:35:21 PM »
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12222
  • Liked:
Re: Coronavirus discussion and Quarantine ideas
« Reply #14713 on: August 10, 2021, 06:35:40 PM »
I like your previous link could you repost?

The Dr Sircus stuff? 

I want the 10 minutes of my life back after reading that.


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.