header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 85112 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25544
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #980 on: August 30, 2023, 11:40:46 AM »
That list is trash.

UW not in the top 25? LMAO.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72233
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #981 on: August 30, 2023, 11:52:22 AM »
Well, it's in  keeping with the theme of this thread, e.g., how many things get "ranked" by someone, whether they make any sense or not, often not, and whether the rankings even mean anything at all useful or notable.

Now, someone might define "biggest brands" with something related and quantative, like money spent buying shirts etc.  Maybe that list would be, well, a list.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14386
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #982 on: August 30, 2023, 12:06:27 PM »
Well, it's in  keeping with the theme of this thread, e.g., how many things get "ranked" by someone, whether they make any sense or not, often not, and whether the rankings even mean anything at all useful or notable.

Now, someone might define "biggest brands" with something related and quantative, like money spent buying shirts etc.  Maybe that list would be, well, a list.
yeah except measuring which brands are the biggest is a very easy and objective thing to do- and there is no subjectivity involved whatsoever. 

that is literally how you measure how big certain brands are, measuring tv viewers + ticket sales + merchandising sales. 

And when doing that, there is no galaxy in this universe or any universe in which Michigan and Notre Dame are not in the top 5 of that. Your top 5 would be Ohio State, Bama, Michigan, Notre Dame, and probably Texas.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72233
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #983 on: August 30, 2023, 12:10:25 PM »
If someone posted that, though, they wouldn't get much attention beyond "Well, yeah...".  By posting a stupid ranking, one gets noticed.


Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14386
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #984 on: August 30, 2023, 12:14:29 PM »
If someone posted that, though, they wouldn't get much attention beyond "Well, yeah...".  By posting a stupid ranking, one gets noticed.
very true. 

in this day and age, everything is just about getting clicks. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25544
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #985 on: September 18, 2023, 11:08:04 AM »
Alabama is not in the AP top 10. Clemson is unranked.

The world is changing.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #986 on: September 18, 2023, 11:15:59 AM »
yeah, he's an obvious dumbass. Michigan and Notre Dame are both easily top 5 national brands in college football. Dumbfk has Michigan at #16 and ND at #12. Lol.
Having A&M above Texas really brings the lulz as well.  No offense intended to our good friend Gigem.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #987 on: September 18, 2023, 11:17:10 AM »
Alabama is not in the AP top 10. Clemson is unranked.

The world is changing.
Brands don't change nearly as quickly as the current football landscape.  If it did, then we'd have no designation for "helmet" teams.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14386
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #988 on: September 18, 2023, 11:34:24 AM »

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #989 on: September 18, 2023, 12:40:37 PM »
Looks like they weigh MOV over total cupcakes pretty highly.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14386
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #990 on: September 18, 2023, 12:41:44 PM »
Looks like they weigh MOV over total cupcakes pretty highly.
ESPN FPI and their playoff predictor or whatever the f it's called are both just god awful. but it's from ESPN, so of course it's god awful. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25544
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #991 on: September 18, 2023, 01:32:31 PM »
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #992 on: September 18, 2023, 01:36:19 PM »
When does Wisconsin play Johns Hopkins in football this year?  Or are they in the other division?

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25544
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #993 on: September 18, 2023, 01:53:08 PM »
Hopkins is a Lacrosse member only.

ND is a member for hockey. 
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.