header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 84581 times)

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14381
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #910 on: August 22, 2023, 09:08:48 AM »
yup, this is what folks that want rotating schedules in 18-team conferences don't understand

killing of rivalries
realignment has killed some great ones....RIP Nebraska-OU.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17801
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #911 on: August 22, 2023, 09:09:18 AM »
yup, this is what folks that want rotating schedules in 18-team conferences don't understand

killing of rivalries
Well you protect the true rivalries, obviously.

But it doesn't make for creating new ones, I'll grant you that.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #912 on: August 22, 2023, 09:11:55 AM »
Pitt-WVU has no business being on any list....sorry.

UGA-UF should be #3....why is that behind UGA-Auburn? Da fk?

BAMA-Tenn was a really good rivalry until Tennessee went into the freaking tank and sucked ass for eons. Maybe it's coming back?
yes, when you limit the annual opponents to 3 or maybe 4 protected rivalries, when one or two go lopsided for a decade it's not a rivalry any longer.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #913 on: August 22, 2023, 09:12:45 AM »
Well you protect the true rivalries, obviously.

But it doesn't make for creating new ones, I'll grant you that.
yup, and as some old rivalries fade, new ones aren't created
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14381
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #914 on: August 22, 2023, 09:14:06 AM »
Yeah I've never really thought of MSU-ND as a rivalry although they're met 79 times.

UM-ND seems like more of one, but they've only played something like 43 times.  And it seems like most of the really good rivalries formed much of their lore during the "Golden Era" of college football in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s, but Michigan and ND only played 4 times in those entire 4 decades
M-ND have a weird ass relationship/history. Lots of pettiness and bad blood there on both sides. They are natural born rivals though- just makes so much sense for them to play each other every year- yet they don't. There were some great M-ND games in the 80s, 90s, 00s, and 2010s. Even in the 2000 and 2010s when one team was bad or they were both bad- the games were usually very good. 

I do wish they'd play every year. Even though I hate them. Not gonna lie. It's two of the biggest brands in the sport- and it's good for the sport when they play each other. 

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17801
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #915 on: August 22, 2023, 09:24:13 AM »
M-ND have a weird ass relationship/history. Lots of pettiness and bad blood there on both sides. They are natural born rivals though- just makes so much sense for them to play each other every year- yet they don't. There were some great M-ND games in the 80s, 90s, 00s, and 2010s. Even in the 2000 and 2010s when one team was bad or they were both bad- the games were usually very good.

I do wish they'd play every year. Even though I hate them. Not gonna lie. It's two of the biggest brands in the sport- and it's good for the sport when they play each other.

Yup I'd love to see them play every year, too.

That's the thing I'm most excited about with Texas moving to the SEC-- renewing our annual rivalries with Texas A&M and Arkansas.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25502
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #916 on: August 22, 2023, 09:48:02 AM »
Maybe ND will someday join the Big 100.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14381
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #917 on: August 22, 2023, 10:00:49 AM »
Maybe ND will someday join the Big 100.
I say take ND and one of Miami/UNC/FSU/Clem, call it the B1G20 and put a bow on it call it a day

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25502
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #918 on: August 22, 2023, 10:05:30 AM »
I say take ND and one of Miami/UNC/FSU/Clem, call it the B1G20 and put a bow on it call it a day
I think they are going to 24.

So, Stanford, ND, Miami, FSU, UNC and UVA.

4 6 team divisions, one divisional championship game and a final.

Then the MNC game against the SEC24 winner.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14381
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #919 on: August 22, 2023, 10:14:06 AM »
I think they are going to 24.

So, Stanford, ND, Miami, FSU, UNC and UVA.

4 6 team divisions, one divisional championship game and a final.

Then the MNC game against the SEC24 winner.
I'd be cool with that. think it's stupid af that we have like 197 FBS teams as it is....there's no need for that.

48 teams in two super conferences with a playoff sounds about right....

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25502
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #920 on: August 22, 2023, 10:24:31 AM »
I'd be cool with that. think it's stupid af that we have like 197 FBS teams as it is....there's no need for that.

48 teams in two super conferences with a playoff sounds about right....
I don't know about "right" but we are where we are and we ain't going back. 

I wish for 6 conferences of 10 schools each. Not gonna happen, even though it would be right.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12315
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #921 on: August 22, 2023, 10:35:30 AM »
Screw ND.

If someday there is a BIG 100, I hope ND is 101. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72189
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #922 on: August 22, 2023, 10:37:20 AM »
Is it possible to form a "football association" or independents?  Not exactly a conference, but they'd play each other annually.  TV monies would not be split.

jgvol

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4910
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #923 on: August 22, 2023, 10:44:35 AM »


Anyone pining for that Colorado St. / Wyoming border war?  WTF

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.