header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rank these teams

 (Read 14279 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37853
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #42 on: December 14, 2020, 02:19:24 PM »
I haven't watched the Aggies much at all this season

I have watched the Buckeyes quite a bit.  The Buckeyes look like the Buckeyes from the past few seasons.  Maybe w/o the all world DE or the RB that is destined for NFL greatness, but a team that can stand up to Clemson and possibly even Bama.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72301
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #43 on: December 14, 2020, 02:28:25 PM »
I've watched Bama, OSU, and Clemson.  I think you could throw a hat over them.  Bama's D has looked better of late.  Fields gives OSU an edge that can be critical in games at this level, but so does Lawrence.  I would probably give a slight edge to Clemson.  Very slight.

A&M has solid lines and a decent QB.  They might be the best of the rest.  UGA with JT Daniels at the helm is a different animal, now.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17831
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #44 on: December 14, 2020, 02:28:42 PM »
I haven't watched the Aggies much at all this season

I have watched the Buckeyes quite a bit.  The Buckeyes look like the Buckeyes from the past few seasons.  Maybe w/o the all world DE or the RB that is destined for NFL greatness, but a team that can stand up to Clemson and possibly even Bama.
Well unless they poop the bed on Saturday, we'll find out in a couple of weeks.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17220
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #45 on: December 14, 2020, 02:54:07 PM »
I suppose most of us would love to see some carnage / some true 2020 stuff, like NW upset OSU.  Gators upset Bama.  Notre Dame upset Clemson.

some new blood in there
If they'd eliminate Bama/Bucks/Tiges I'd be all for it.Or maybe 2 of the 3
Don't go to bed with any woman crazier than you. - Frank Zappa

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72301
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #46 on: December 14, 2020, 02:57:24 PM »
If you get a great QB, and have an otherwise sound team, you should be competitive at the elite level.  The difference is HUGE (duh), in college anyway.

UGA last year with Fields at QB is probably a playoff team.  OSU without Fields would have been a very good team but probably not playoff caliber.

Clemson, same story.  Bama is obviously sound and deep and has a very competent QB who runs their offense well, he's not so obviously talented but might make the best NFL qb.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7891
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #47 on: December 14, 2020, 03:05:18 PM »
Not sure why you feel the need to insult their case?  They're not as the same level as Alabama, obviously, and they're most likely not at the same level as a full-strength Clemson or Ohio State. 

Beyond that, I think they have a reasonable case for "best of the rest." 
Because I think it's a bad case. 

Their best wins are shootout win vs. an 8-2 Florida team with a real suspect defense.
Their second-best win is 6-4 Auburn that probably isn't much stronger than their record.

They've not really dominated anyone outside South Carolina, and even in that game, they needed a really nice drive just to get to 21 points at halftime vs an abysmal defense. Neither their offense nor their defense is special. 

The case is basically one win, a nice close one against a good team, and going 8-1 in a conference that's usually good. That might well be enough. But they've not at any point really played like a really good team. I just don't see much there there. And without much there, give me someone at least interesting who got shelled. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72301
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #48 on: December 14, 2020, 03:07:44 PM »
A lot of these second tier teams on the list have suspect records, no great looking wins and some close wins over suspect opponents.


bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7891
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #49 on: December 14, 2020, 03:09:24 PM »
Nah, I've just watched them a lot this season.  They're actually, legitimately good. Not great by any stretch, but a good, solid team, all the way around, for the first time in a long time.  Even their 2012 team with Johnny Football was more of a gunslinging, gambling team, than a solid football team.

I think this is were we mostly agree. They are good. I don't think just good but great at nothing gets you in, especially if your main chip is depreciating. 

Kris60

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2514
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #50 on: December 14, 2020, 03:15:21 PM »
I think ND gets in over A&M even with a loss.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17831
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #51 on: December 14, 2020, 03:17:47 PM »
I think this is were we mostly agree. They are good. I don't think just good but great at nothing gets you in, especially if your main chip is depreciating.
But "greatness" isn't going to be required for the CFP.  In "the rest" who do you think is "great?"

Notre Dame looks "solid" as well, but not great by any stretch.  I don't think they'll stay within 2 TDs of a full-strength Clemson.

Are USC or Cincy or any of the other potential #4 teams "great?"  I don't see it.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72301
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #52 on: December 14, 2020, 03:18:41 PM »
ND beat Clemson of course and UNC, and that's about it for them as well.

I'd like to see Cincy get a shot.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17831
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #53 on: December 14, 2020, 03:20:15 PM »
ND beat Clemson of course and UNC, and that's about it for them as well.

I'd like to see Cincy get a shot.
For sure I'd like to see that, too.  I don't think it'll happen but it would be interesting.

NorthernOhioBuckeye

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1109
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #54 on: December 14, 2020, 03:25:03 PM »
I think ND gets in over A&M even with a loss.
I think ND gets in obviously if they win, but even if they loose it close. There is NO way that the CFP committee leaves them out with a close game. 

If ND/Clemson is close with a Clemson win, Bama and tOSU both win, it will probably be:

1. Bama
2. Clemson
3. tOSU
4. ND

This will prevent yet a third matchup of ND/Clemson along with a back to back game between the two. It also gives the rematch from last years semi final game that a lot of people said was the best game of the playoffs last year.

If Clemson looses, they are out. Provided that Bama, tOSU and A&M all win, it would be:

1. Bama
2. ND
3. tOSU
4. A&M

If Bama and tOSU lose, who knows. 

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8950
  • Liked:
Re: Rank these teams
« Reply #55 on: December 14, 2020, 03:28:53 PM »
It is funny, I think all of this tOSU vs aTm discussion is missing the point.  IMHO, if tOSU beats NU, they are in.  Assuming favorites win the ACC, B1G, and SEC CG's, the top three will be:

  • Bama
  • Clemson
  • tOSU

Further, as far as tOSU is concerned the B1GCG is win or go home.  If they lose, they are out.  In a normal, full year if the Buckeyes were undefeated at this point at 12-0 and had looked generally like a CFP team in doing so, the Buckeyes would have at least a modicum of a chance with a close loss in the CG.  THEN we'd debate 1-loss tOSU vs 1-loss aTm.  

In this case with the Buckeyes at 5-0 heading to the CG, it is win = in, lose = out.  

Assuming the top three laid out above, the real debate is going to be at #4 between:
  • 8-1 aTm (assuming they beat TN)
  • 10-1 Notre Dame
  • 9-0 Cincy (assuming they beat Tulsa)

You could make a case for one of the other P5 Champs if it is:
  • 9-2 ISU with a win over OU, or
  • 8-2 OU with a win over ISU, or
  • 6-0 USC with a win over UW

However, I think the two losses would knock out ISU/OU and USC is pretty far back with a whole bunch of closer-than-they-should-have-been wins.  I just don't think they'll get in.  

Finally, I think this whole debate is academic because, as I said upthread, I would take Bama against an all-star team made up of the best players from aTm, ND, and Cincy.  Thus, the debate is simply over which team gets to get drilled by Bama in the Sugar Bowl.  


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.