header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?

 (Read 36892 times)

TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #280 on: December 01, 2017, 07:39:47 AM »
no sense having 8 spots for the 4 whiners
love this.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #281 on: December 01, 2017, 10:31:57 AM »
All this "will OSU make the playoffs" talk is leaving a quesy feeling for me. There is a really good Wisconsin team waiting in Indianapolis, just lickin' their chops and ready to open a can.
I've engaged in a lot of "will OSU make the playoffs" talk and I want to clarify something here:
It isn't because I think OSU will win, or even because I'm an OSU fan.  It is simply because the Bama/tOSU topic is the most interesting topic in the nation in CFB right now.  If Wisconsin wins there is nothing to talk about.  The Badgers are in with a win, no debate, no discussion.  
The same is true of the SECCG.  Unless you are an Auburn or Georgia fan there just isn't anything to discuss.  The winner is going to the playoffs and the loser isn't.  End of story, no debate, no discussion.  
The two most interesting topics in national CFB right now are:
  • What happens if Ohio State beats Wisconsin? and
  • What happens if TCU beats Oklahoma?

I think that #2 is substantially less interesting than #1 because the committee's statement that "5-8 are very close" includes #8 Ohio State but explicitly excludes #11 TCU.  Thus, I'm fairly certain that TCU is simply playing for a spot for Bama.  If TCU wins, Bama goes.  

With #8 Ohio State it is, or at least might be, different.  If 5-8 are very close then there is at least a chance that #8 could leap-frog #5 by acquiring a major win (over #4) and a Conference Championship while #5 sits idle at home watching television.  

This is quite obviously the most interesting topic in national CFB right now.  

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #282 on: December 01, 2017, 10:53:45 AM »
the reality is likely somewhere in between. francois could have made a difference in some of those game, but not all. they're likely similar to lsu or msu, imo.
I agree with you but that really doesn't clarify anything and I don't know what the committee will do.  
If you just flat viewed FSU as a contender when they played Bama then Bama's schedule is at least comparable to Ohio State's and Bama has a better record, less losses, no REALLY bad loss, and a signature win and probably gets in over Ohio State no problem.  
If you just flat view FSU as a 6-6 ACC also-ran then Ohio State's SoS is substantially better and the Buckeyes have better wins and a Conference Championship and a much better signature win (if they beat Wisconsin and none of this is relevant if they don't) compared against more losses and a REALLY bad loss.  I think the Buckeyes probably win that.  
If you view FSU as something in between then who knows.  

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14340
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #283 on: December 01, 2017, 11:05:43 AM »
why are y'all arguing where FSU is-isn't without Francois? Like Parcells said...you are what your record says you are. At the end of the day- they are a 6-6 team.

Michigan limped to an 8-4 record with John O'Korn starting most of their games. Don't hear anyone making excuses for Harbaugh/Michigan like they are with Jimbo/FSU. FSU doesn't have 3 wins if John O'Korn is their QB.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2017, 11:09:09 AM by Mdot21 »

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #284 on: December 01, 2017, 11:14:29 AM »
Yes, I flat view FSU as a 6-6 ACC also-ran

I didn't watch all of their games or even all 6 losses, butif you did watch those games, how else could you see them?

as a top 10 team with a few bad breaks?
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14340
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #285 on: December 01, 2017, 11:23:21 AM »
Yes, I flat view FSU as a 6-6 ACC also-ran

I didn't watch all of their games or even all 6 losses, butif you did watch those games, how else could you see them?

as a top 10 team with a few bad breaks?
QB is so important, by far most important position on the entire team. Francois was really good, but he wouldn't have made them a top 10 team. He was a good notch below JT Barrett or Trace McSorley. JT is like an A college QB, McSorley an A-. Francois a really good QB, but not a truly great one. He's not a transcendent college QB, program elevator like a Baker Mayfield or Tebow- those guys are like A++. Francois is just not anywhere close to that. I'd say he's a really good B+ college QB.
FSU was a lot like Michigan to start the season- way overrated. Michigan and FSU both should've been rated 18-25 range pre-season based on what they lost the year before.

TresselownsUM

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #286 on: December 01, 2017, 11:23:36 AM »
The MSU vs CMU/WMU games were 3-for-1s.

Then I'm looking forward to Wisconsin play at a MAC school. I never said MSU had a home and home, I said they were willing to give a MAC school a home game. Wisconsin's "too good" to do something like that. They're "too good" that no one in division 1 is willing to scheduled a "guaranteed loss" in camp randall. They're "too good" that no one, in any of the other power 4 conferences will play them.

But I'm really looking forward to Western KY, New Mexico and BYU next year. I'm sure season ticket holders are as well.

2019 Kent St, South Florida, Central Michigan Yipee!


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #287 on: December 01, 2017, 12:24:49 PM »
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #288 on: December 01, 2017, 12:25:40 PM »
The MSU vs CMU/WMU games were 3-for-1s.

Then I'm looking forward to Wisconsin play at a MAC school. I never said MSU had a home and home, I said they were willing to give a MAC school a home game. Wisconsin's "too good" to do something like that. They're "too good" that no one in division 1 is willing to scheduled a "guaranteed loss" in camp randall. They're "too good" that no one, in any of the other power 4 conferences will play them.

But I'm really looking forward to Western KY, New Mexico and BYU next year. I'm sure season ticket holders are as well.

2019 Kent St, South Florida, Central Michigan Yipee!


Just look backward. And not too far backward either.

Try again?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #289 on: December 01, 2017, 12:42:34 PM »
2019 (2017 record shown below)


AT South Florida, 9-2, could be a tough road game in Tampa if Strong sticks around
Central Michigan, 8-4, a good MAC team
Kent St 2-10, gimme game

Doesn't look all that bad from here.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

TresselownsUM

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #290 on: December 01, 2017, 12:50:06 PM »
you know, I should really apologize.

I really give credit to Barrie, it's amazing how he gets a 12 game schedule, since everyone he's scheduling is guaranteed a loss. he must be quite the salesman

TresselownsUM

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #291 on: December 01, 2017, 12:51:23 PM »
Just look backward. And not too far backward either.

Try again?


I went back to 2012 and can't find Wisconsin playing a road game at a MAC school, so I guess you'll have to enlighten me on this one

TresselownsUM

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #292 on: December 01, 2017, 12:53:36 PM »
AT South Florida, 9-2, could be a tough road game in Tampa if Strong sticks around
Central Michigan, 8-4, a good MAC team
Kent St 2-10, gimme game


if you have hopes for the Natty next year, you'll need to be 13-0 again, or 12-1 and hope for UM, PSU to be ranked high.

any time you have to say a "good mac team" that's not saying much

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Playoffs! Did someone say Playoffs?
« Reply #293 on: December 01, 2017, 12:54:49 PM »
2019 (2017 record shown below)


AT South Florida, 9-2, could be a tough road game in Tampa if Strong sticks around
Central Michigan, 8-4, a good MAC team
Kent St 2-10, gimme game

Doesn't look all that bad from here.
it will certainly look good enough if the Badgers are undefeated in December
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.