header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 14   Go Down
Author

Topic: Playoff field, impact of CCG's

 (Read 6609 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31097
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #98 on: December 08, 2024, 09:57:53 AM »
This



is not this.

Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45518
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #99 on: December 08, 2024, 10:32:13 AM »
Agreed 

Doesn't change the fact that a loss to Michigan is bad
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9344
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #100 on: December 08, 2024, 10:34:31 AM »
Quote from: OrangeAfroMan on December 07, 2024, 09:12:46 PM
I'm eager for someone to explain how ASU jumps Boise, when they're 5 spots apart and both won their CCGs. 
If it happens, becuase “spots” and “winning CCGs” are both somewhat soft inputs, and because the whole committee process is pretty vibes based and lacks continuity. 
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82611
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #101 on: December 08, 2024, 10:37:30 AM »
IF we end up with:

Clemson at Texas - Probably a 10+ point spread.

Tenn at Ohio State - Maybe a 5 point spread.

Indiana at ND - Maybe 8 point spread.

Alabama at PSU - Maybe 6 point spread.  

Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22226
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #102 on: December 08, 2024, 11:09:52 AM »
Oh man I'd love to see Indiana play, and beat, the domers.  How much fun would that be???
Logged

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #103 on: December 08, 2024, 11:33:45 AM »
Quote from: Cincydawg on December 08, 2024, 08:37:21 AM
There will always be controversy in who is left out.  They make a decision and that's that.
Mystery solved!
Logged
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82611
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #104 on: December 08, 2024, 11:35:15 AM »
Any ordering will generate controversy, we all knew that, and perhaps it will be enough to redo things after next season.
Logged

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #105 on: December 08, 2024, 11:35:44 AM »
Quote from: 847badgerfan on December 08, 2024, 09:25:11 AM
I don't count Michigan as a bad loss for OSU. Michigan has a 7-5 record and it's the biggest rivalry game in the land.

NIU has a 7-5 record in the MAC. That's a bad loss.
When a 10-1 team loses to a conference foe at 6-5.....that's always a bad loss.  
Logged
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82611
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #106 on: December 08, 2024, 11:37:11 AM »
O'Gara: Projecting the final Playoff field for Selection Sunday
O'Gara: Projecting the final Playoff field for Selection Sunday

Pretty close to my "ranking".  No Bama.

Logged

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #107 on: December 08, 2024, 11:40:04 AM »
SMU is 11-2 vs the 60th-hardest schedule.
Alabama is 9-3 vs the 16th-hardest schedule.

The outcomes matter AND the who the outcomes are against matters.
Logged
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

highVOLtage

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 13629
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #108 on: December 08, 2024, 11:46:05 AM »
Quote from: Cincydawg on December 08, 2024, 10:37:30 AM
IF we end up with:

Clemson at Texas - Probably a 10+ point spread.

Tenn at Ohio State - Maybe a 5 point spread.

Indiana at ND - Maybe 8 point spread.

Alabama at PSU - Maybe 6 point spread.

First round games?

Indiana at Penn State (winner plays Georgia)
Alabama(90%)/SMU(10%) at Texas (winner plays Boise St)
Tennessee at Ohio St (winner plays Oregon)
Clemson at ND (winner plays Arizona St)
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82611
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #109 on: December 08, 2024, 11:46:58 AM »
Bama also lost to Vandy and should have lost to USCe at home and got blown out by OU.  I would leave them out.  Playing a tough slate is one thing, losing to two near pastries is not good in my view.

Had ND beaten NIU, they'd probably be ranked #1 and only at 5 in the playoff.  Maybe Oregon would top them.
Logged

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21774
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #110 on: December 08, 2024, 12:17:25 PM »
Quote from: Cincydawg on December 08, 2024, 11:46:58 AM
Bama also lost to Vandy and should have lost to USCe at home and got blown out by OU.  I would leave them out.  Playing a tough slate is one thing, losing to two near pastries is not good in my view.

Had ND beaten NIU, they'd probably be ranked #1 and only at 5 in the playoff.  Maybe Oregon would top them.
Listing the bad and ignoring the good is 1-sided.  Be 2-sided.
Logged
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31097
  • Liked:
Re: Playoff field, impact of CCG's
« Reply #111 on: December 08, 2024, 12:26:07 PM »
SMU did not beat a ranked team. 

Of course, IU didn't either, but they only one loss - on the road.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 14   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
FAFO No Trespassing Sign

Custom Candied Sign