Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

Just like it's the Cleveland India......oh wait a second.

• The term “India” made its way into Old English as early as the 9th century. During this period, it referred to the vast landmass beyond the Indus River.
• In Modern English, the term “India” reemerged in the 17th century. It became synonymous with the subcontinent that includes present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.

"Indians" is just easier to say, and most folks now what you mean in context.  I make some effort to use the term preferred by some group, but I personally don't care.

OK, I can admit sometimes I can come across as an arrogant know it all, so I apologize for these next couple of comments

Well, see there is also this country that exists that we like to call India, whose immigrants would also like to lay claim to the Indian American name.

If you are going to give a name to a people,  it might help if you do not mistake them for people from half way around the world.

OK now that out of the way,  I have to admit the Cleveland Guardians and Washington Commanders names have grown on me.  Neither one was my favorite choice when the made the name change,  but part the process is just getting used to the name that they chose. 
Washington especially seems to be slow itself to embrace its new name.  Putting a generic W on its helmet for now.  But I have a hunch it could all be part of a long term marketing strategy.  Give fans about 5-10 years to get used to the new name,  then change the team colors to look more like a Naval Commander Uniform and change the helmet to a classic Navy ship or something like that. I could be wrong.  We will see.

I don't overly like being called "white" and I don't have any particular affinity to Angles, Saxons, or the Caucasus mountains.

Yet here we are.