header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)

 (Read 3232 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37506
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2022, 06:57:50 PM »
I would be ecstatic to see my school play the entire B1G every year. Instead, we are fed this crap.


Blame your AD
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2022, 06:59:13 PM »
The late-90s Big 10 eleven teams could be a special division.  None of the other conferences have a special 11, exactly.  The SEC was at 10 for a long time, the Pac was at 8, then 10, then 12.  BUT - CU could be 'odd man out' as switching divisions would put them back with some old Big 8 brethren.  
.
From the ACC, you'd have the AAU members vying for B1G entry and the ones valuing football dollars happy with an SEC invite.  It would all work out nicely.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #30 on: April 20, 2022, 07:20:36 PM »
Big 10 (11) but really 22:
UM, MSU, OSU, PSU, IU, PU, Illini, NW, Wis, Minn, Iowa
UNL, Pitt, Duke, GT, UNC, UVa, RU, UMd, ND, Syr, BC
.
SEC
A&M, Texas, OU, LSU, Ark, Miz, OM, MSU, Ala, Aub, FSU
Fla, UGA, Miami, USCe, UK, Van, Tenn, VT, NCST, Clem, NCST
.
The Big West Coast and Mountain and yet Plains Conference:
UW, WSU, UO, ORST, Cal, Stan, USC, UCLA, UA, ASU, Utah
CU, BYU, TTU, KU, TCU, Bay, OKST, KSU, ISU, UH, WV, Cinci
.
So here, the biggest loser is probably Louisville.  Wake is dropped.  UCF's big plans are over.  But those are some minor snubs, no?  
.
Also in this scenario, I see the Big 10-11-22 and the SEC saying, "yeah, no, we're not sharing the giant pool of money with you anymore, Big West" about 15 years down the line.  And you'd have another schism, with the 2 monsters poaching the prettiest pieces of the Big West's sinking ship.  More expansion and an adieu to your 11-team divisions.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #31 on: April 20, 2022, 07:23:06 PM »
Each division would be it's own thing, in essence.  They'd play all 10 in their division, 1 or a max of 2 from the other division, then whatever OOC games left for the schedule (1 or 2).  
.
By "advancing" this far forward, you'd get what badge yearns for AND a very regional format again.  
The old Big Ten11, a new Big Ten22, the old SEC, a new SECACC, the old Pac-10, a new frankenstein monster.
.
Fun.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17134
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #32 on: April 20, 2022, 09:34:36 PM »
Uhh, who opined that???
Many at the time the Noles and Canes where in the hardware discussion every year.BC & VT were on the upswing.VTech won the conference the 1st year,won the Coastal Division the Next year losing to the Noles for the Championship.Finished in the the top ten a couple of times,Noles & Canes uncharacteristicly started sliding after nearly 2 decades of dominance.Point being attempting to build the perfect beast of a conference doesn't mean it's going to happen
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #33 on: April 20, 2022, 09:44:32 PM »
I heard nothing like that at all.  The residual predictions I recall that didn't turn out to happen were that FSU and Miami would meet in the ACC CG every year.  I don't remember one mention of how strong the ACC suddenly would be.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17134
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #34 on: April 20, 2022, 09:53:47 PM »
Yes - What conference (at the time) based on recent resume had 1-2 punch like that,however it didn't materialize
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #35 on: April 20, 2022, 11:38:13 PM »
I'm not saying you're wrong, I just didn't hear it, and I was living in FL at the time.
.
Miami was elite then, but FSU averaged 4 losses per season the 3 years before the ACC expanded.  They were both expected to kick ass IN the ACC, but with that being the expectation, that would suggest the attitude was that it wasn't a deep conference, and thus, not an especially strong one.
No?
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25187
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #36 on: April 21, 2022, 07:04:40 AM »
The late-90s Big 10 eleven teams could be a special division.  None of the other conferences have a special 11, exactly.  The SEC was at 10 for a long time, the Pac was at 8, then 10, then 12.  BUT - CU could be 'odd man out' as switching divisions would put them back with some old Big 8 brethren. 
.
From the ACC, you'd have the AAU members vying for B1G entry and the ones valuing football dollars happy with an SEC invite.  It would all work out nicely.
No thanks to the ACC schools.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #37 on: April 21, 2022, 07:08:32 PM »
No thanks to the ACC schools.
Who then?  If it came out that the B1G invited 2 schools not named ND, who would your preference be?  Kansas?  Texas?  Florida?
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #38 on: April 21, 2022, 11:24:50 PM »
If 66 is too many, and you think it'd be more exclusive, it could just be a 16-team SEC, 16-team B1G (with ND and Pitt) and a 16-team "others," which would be geographically stupid.  
SEC w/ Texas + OU
B1G + ND + Pitt
Hodge-Podge Conf w/ some PAC, Big 12, and ACC teams.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25187
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #39 on: April 22, 2022, 06:36:51 AM »
Who then?  If it came out that the B1G invited 2 schools not named ND, who would your preference be?  Kansas?  Texas?  Florida?
If I had to take two?

USC and Stanford.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11237
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #40 on: April 22, 2022, 09:49:09 AM »
Fcs has a wider chasm between the top and the bottom than Fbs does. So you'd have to split that up too. Then there'd be four levels instead of two levels. Meh.

Fwiw, The Ivy League initially stayed FBS until the early 80s
« Last Edit: April 22, 2022, 11:20:01 AM by Brutus Buckeye »
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: New split, like back in the 70s (1-A and 1-AA)
« Reply #41 on: April 22, 2022, 10:15:41 AM »
There's already more than 4 levels, with Div II, III, and even NAIA (if it still exists).  The number of levels growing is not an issue.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.