header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Is Urby In Trouble Here?

 (Read 83328 times)

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1092 on: August 25, 2018, 09:43:09 PM »
That 300,000 + evidently came in handy I'm guessin' for her & the kids.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2018, 09:47:13 PM by MrNubbz »
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5807
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1093 on: August 25, 2018, 09:47:15 PM »
HB - there’s parts of your take that I’m really trying to understand but I can’t make click in my head.

The false narrative that Meyer covered up and lied for ZS, but then proceed to call ZS a POS. I simply don’t understand how you can claim he’s a POS but think Meyer didn’t cover for him. Take DV out for a second. I think that’s you’re sticking point. Are you assuming everyone thinks Meyer knew about the DV and was protecting it? If so, I think you’re misunderstanding some of the general outrage here.

Speaking for myself, I think Meyer covered ZS’s scummy activities, besides DV.

Lastly, how is it clear that the OSU Camp doesn’t believe the abuse claims? What factual evidence helped you get there. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just looking how you connected the dots to that vs they were turning a blind eye ha they didn’t believe it happened.
Then we agree, it isn’t about the alleged DV.
You can say Meyer covered for ZS.  But is it really “covering” or is just being too blindly loyal to see the danger.  Was there really any risk to Meyer from the loss of ZS?  No.
And if you just compile what Smiths attorney said, specifically about false reports, what Meyer said about he said she said in that very clip you posted, and entertain the possibility that ther is some truth in what the two moms are saying, it is really obvious that the police, and the OSU camp was skeptical at best.  
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

SuperMario

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1267
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1094 on: August 26, 2018, 09:24:20 AM »
Then we agree, it isn’t about the alleged DV.
You can say Meyer covered for ZS.  But is it really “covering” or is just being too blindly loyal to see the danger.  Was there really any risk to Meyer from the loss of ZS?  No.
And if you just compile what Smiths attorney said, specifically about false reports, what Meyer said about he said she said in that very clip you posted, and entertain the possibility that ther is some truth in what the two moms are saying, it is really obvious that the police, and the OSU camp was skeptical at best.  
But back to my point, we’re absent factual evidence. Almost everyone has universally agree that ZS is a POS and Courtney is a little crazy, but we’re going to put the two mothers that raised them on a pedestal and believe they are reliable witnesses? I’m yet to be convinced both families aren’t nuts.
Meyer had a vested interest in taking the approach he didn’t believe it actually happened and so did the program and police department at that point. I don’t think there is any evidence showing the abuse didn’t happen and judging by the character is ZS, it’s very possibly it did. It’s also possible it didn’t and he’s just a dirtbag and she’s batsh*t crazy, but I think it’s unreasonable to see we have clear evidence.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12222
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1095 on: August 26, 2018, 10:40:59 AM »
It's true. Whether on the cloud (iMessage) or by device forensics, it can be retrieved. But only with a court order, and we should doubt that will ever happen (and even if it does, that Urban will still have that device). An FOIA request wouldn't bring this up either. Not without a court order. Which is really unlikely.
Having the technology to get them (we do) and still not seeing them (we won't) in no way absolves the conspiracy with Voltolini or deletion or tips the balances to say there's probably nothing there.
Couldn't the OSU investigation have gotten a hold of them? I don't know if Meyer's phone is paid for by the school, but I would have thought they'd have tried to get the past texts through court if necessary.
Unless of course they knew they'd find something to justify firing Meyer and didn't want to find info they couldn't explain away. 

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1096 on: August 26, 2018, 11:03:35 AM »

Unless of course they knew they'd find something to justify firing Meyer and didn't want to find info they couldn't explain away.
bingo
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1097 on: August 26, 2018, 11:44:41 AM »
There were elements of the BoT that would have liked to see precisely that.Meyer nourished this whole debacle for 6 years - even by just standing by and doing nothing.Some of the most influential members evidently wanted Urbs head on a platter
« Last Edit: August 26, 2018, 11:50:57 AM by MrNubbz »
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5807
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1098 on: August 26, 2018, 04:27:10 PM »
But back to my point, we’re absent factual evidence. Almost everyone has universally agree that ZS is a POS and Courtney is a little crazy, but we’re going to put the two mothers that raised them on a pedestal and believe they are reliable witnesses? I’m yet to be convinced both families aren’t nuts.
Meyer had a vested interest in taking the approach he didn’t believe it actually happened and so did the program and police department at that point. I don’t think there is any evidence showing the abuse didn’t happen and judging by the character is ZS, it’s very possibly it did. It’s also possible it didn’t and he’s just a dirtbag and she’s batsh*t crazy, but I think it’s unreasonable to see we have clear evidence.
But what specifically was Urbans-vested interest?
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1099 on: August 26, 2018, 05:46:45 PM »
Couldn't the OSU investigation have gotten a hold of them? I don't know if Meyer's phone is paid for by the school, but I would have thought they'd have tried to get the past texts through court if necessary.
Unless of course they knew they'd find something to justify firing Meyer and didn't want to find info they couldn't explain away.
I think they eliminated that option when they gave the investigation a 2-week timeline. Approval/Forensics could easily take longer, right?

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1100 on: August 26, 2018, 05:56:59 PM »
I don't think this statement is correct.
I guess I have to agree. The timing of OSU's Monday announcements for "monitoring" and then firing Zach Smith (within an hour) after each McMurphy's two Monday reports could be correlative and not causative. I'm skeptical that it's absolutely the case but I can't deny the possibility.
(Pet peeve is that Urban's 3 weeks suspension ends up being 7 weeks, while Gene's is an actual 3, but that could just be petteyness on my part.)
Many of us agree that Gene's errors were at least as serious as Meyer's perhaps more. So I'm 100% with you. Though I would clarify that Urban's suspension isn't actually 7 weeks. By technical definition it ends (partly) on September 2nd. And I'd say that if we split up a coach's duties, being with the team for the Sun-Fri of weeks 2/3 is far more valuable than being with the team on Saturdays 2/3.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17163
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1101 on: August 27, 2018, 09:05:14 AM »
The onus is on Urby.Gene had brought up firing the Ebola Chimp earlier.The more oversights I see Meyer look past his inaction when something needed to be done.Meyer has flip-flopped and ignoring a prepared statement for the press then arrogantly proclaiming "who makes up stories like that" when there was plenty out there to give the University a black eye.He himself was covering up a series ZS's blunders for 6 seasons.Shit his wifes phone alone was enough to send Zach down the river.I don't think it was a coincidence Zach was fired after the two stories broke.Just like it wasn't a coincidence  Urbz phone got cleaned before an inquiry.Meyer should have been dismissed w/o pay
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Riffraft

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1100
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1102 on: August 27, 2018, 12:50:43 PM »
I don’t think I’m understanding correctly. So he should have followed up harder, but people who subsequently followed up were refused the summary of events? Again, ignorance on my part and I’m asking more to learn.
Would a Sports reporter normally know what to ask for?
I know that if I had an arrest report on someone, the next thing I would do is look for an adjudication of the arrest. A bail hearing, a preliminary hearing, something and if I found nothing I would dig deeper to find out why not.

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1103 on: August 28, 2018, 12:18:30 AM »
I know that if I had an arrest report on someone, the next thing I would do is look for an adjudication of the arrest. A bail hearing, a preliminary hearing, something and if I found nothing I would dig deeper to find out why not.

By the same logic, no member of the public should look at Zach Smith and support him on the basis that, despite the arrests, "he was never charged." 
In which case, I completely agree.

HailHailMSP

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 243
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1104 on: August 29, 2018, 07:40:26 PM »
Zach Smith and his mom are in full meltdown mode on social media today. He is going full attack on the media and his ex-wife. He is posting pictures of his kids and stating his ex-wife and the media are ruining them. Momma Bruce is attacking Ohio State and Urban.

Every time the story starts to die someone from that family dredges it up. Without some serious intervention this looks like it might be spiraling towards a really bad ending.

« Last Edit: August 29, 2018, 07:43:42 PM by HailHailMSP »

SuperMario

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1267
  • Liked:
Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
« Reply #1105 on: August 30, 2018, 08:25:24 AM »

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.