Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

Yes.  Of course it does.  If you choose not to drink Bud Light because a black person is promoting it, you're a bigot.  If you choose not to drink Bud Light because a trans person is promoting it,  you're a bigot.

The fact that you think Bud Light simply sending pics to a transgendered person and allowing that person to post on the internet is "celebrating" them is the crux of the problem and it's entirely on you.

When I drank beer, I preferred Labatt Blue. Not because anyone endorsed it or any other bear, but because of the beers that I tried, I liked it the best.

Well I certainly agree with you on this.  People should drink what they like.  Even if it's Budweiser. I'd be a beer bigot if I thought less of Fearless for drinking his macroswill.  I think less of him for many other reasons, but not his choice in beer.

But that's exactly the point.  They're using this Bud Light deal to champion all of their other issues.

I'm talking about Bud Light sending some cans to a transgender person, and that person posting it to social media, and then a boycott that occurred simply because a transgender person was allowed to promote Bud Light.  If you stop drinking Bud Light because you don't like transgendered people, you're a bigot.  It's just that simple.  It's no different than refusing to drink it if an African-American is promoting it, or an Irishman, or a female.

I've already stated and agreed that Bud Light should have known better, but really all that's admitting is that Bud Light should have understood the deep-seated bigotry and hatred within its core market base.  And well, that's a pretty damning indictment all the way around, isn't it?

Tilting at windmills and hiding from bogeymen.