header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: In other news ...

 (Read 1012459 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18242 on: July 23, 2022, 11:14:31 AM »
Utee did it!
Indeed I did.  I was legitimately interested in, who might care about landing on the moon.

Gigem-- I'm still curious WHY you are so keen on it?  Obviously you're deeply into the tech, is that the reason?  Or is there something else?  

My friend who's an aerospace engineer at NASA in Houston, believes in it, as prep for future Mars missions.  Makes sense to me, but I'm interested in what others think.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18243 on: July 23, 2022, 11:17:45 AM »
NASA's Artemis mission — which will ultimately return humans to the moon's surface for the first time in 50 years, including the first woman and person of color to set foot there — could launch as soon as late August, agency officials said in a news briefing on Wednesday (July 20).

The first phase of the mission, dubbed Artemis-1, will see NASA's massive new Space Launch System (SLS) launch on a four-to-six-week-long trip around the far side of the moon and back. NASA has eyed Aug. 29, Sept. 2 or Sept. 5 as the earliest possible launch dates for the mission, NASA associate administrator Jim Free told reporters.

"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18244 on: July 23, 2022, 11:20:38 AM »
Nerd

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2144
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18245 on: July 23, 2022, 11:22:07 AM »
Space x has been pushing nasa and their political leaders to think bigger. Right now nasa is thinking flags and footprints again. Namely to reassert our dominance in space, re-beat the communists ( China) and mix in a little science. 

Space X is telling them that they have an almost unlimited volume compared to the Apollo style landers for a fraction of the price. There is a large amount of confirmed ice at the moon, near the South Pole in areas that are permanently shaded from the sun. This water could be used to make rocket fuel in what’s known as in situ resource utilization. ISRU. 

Space and the moon are boring because the govt and nasa has made them that way. Missions are few and far between, expensive, and for most people out of reach. Space X already has paying customers to take them around the moon.  Look up “ Blue Moon”. It will only be a matter of time before someone pays to land on the moon. And it will cost hundreds of millions to do it, not billions. 




FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18246 on: July 23, 2022, 11:26:15 AM »
Nerd
says the nerd that is way above my class
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18247 on: July 23, 2022, 11:27:21 AM »
Can't spell geek without EE.

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2144
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18248 on: July 23, 2022, 11:39:32 AM »
Indeed I did.  I was legitimately interested in, who might care about landing on the moon.

Gigem-- I'm still curious WHY you are so keen on it?  Obviously you're deeply into the tech, is that the reason?  Or is there something else? 

My friend who's an aerospace engineer at NASA in Houston, believes in it, as prep for future Mars missions.  Makes sense to me, but I'm interested in what others think.
I've always been captivated and drawn to the space program.  Despite being about an hour away from the JSC I've never worked for the space program, so I have no personal skin into the game.  

I was born in the mid 70's, back when NASA was the golden seal of American ingenuity and pride.  I can remember when they launched the space shuttle and we were told that we would be landing on Mars by 2000.  As time progressed and I realized that the shuttle program really never amounted to what it was hyped to be I kinda lost interest.  The space program, since 1972, has mostly been about jobs with a little science mixed in.  The ISS is more of a political vehicle than a research vehicle. Sure, it does provide some benefit, but not worth the over $100 billion invested.  

I was excited when Bush II announced the return to the moon after the Columbia disaster of 2003.  Back to the moon by 2020 was his goal.  I realized immediately that it would never happen.  The original moonshot was done in less than 10 years.  Bush gave a timeline of 17 years to do something that we had done 40 years prior.  Constellation, as it was called, was cancelled in 2010 already overbudget and behind schedule.  SLS rose from the ashes as a replacement for space shuttle jobs.  Commercial rockets were sort of strung along as a gesture, not a real serious thing but enough money was put in that Space X was able to grab a few contracts and innovate.  Most people don't know this but Elon Musk came very close to going broke trying to get Tesla and Space X off the ground around 2009/2010.  

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17168
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18249 on: July 23, 2022, 11:39:58 AM »
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2144
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18250 on: July 23, 2022, 11:46:13 AM »
When NASA decided to retire the Space Shuttle they needed a way to get the astronauts to the space station from American soil.  They gave Boeing a huge contract, about 4-5 billion dollars on a fixed contract (shocking for the space industry at the time).  Space X was given about half and expected to fail.  Boeing was widely expected to launch first, and there were doubts if Space X would ever launch.

Turns out Space X will be launching their 6th crew mission to the ISS later this summer.  Boeing has barely gotten off the ground.  Despite being given much more money and having a much longer and deeper space heritage they almost lost their first test mission due to software errors. Their second mission, delayed by 2 years, was successful.  They are expected to make their first test crewed flight later this year.  

In the time that Boeing and Space X were awarded the bids for the crewed missions SX developed the technology to be able to reuse their first stage boosters after landing them on a barge at sea.  SX has shifted the market.  Previously the launch market for non government payloads was dominated by the Russians and the ESA with their Arianne Rocket.  

Now?  Space X has completely taken the market from them.  Their launches are tens of millions less and SX makes more money because they are not throwing away the most expensive part of the rocket during launch.   

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2144
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18251 on: July 23, 2022, 11:58:08 AM »
Utee, I'm sure your friend at NASA believes in what they are doing but at this point NASA is just another bloated bureaucracy that is stuck in the past with way too many employees and way too much money.  The joke is, what do you get when you give a team of engineers an unlimited budget and no deadline?  Answer:  Nothing.  Which has been mostly true.  

Space X will have SS operational before Artemis III, and maybe even before Artemis II is ready.  What's to stop them from making a landing attempt, even if unmanned, on the moon?  Why would NASA pay billions to launch SLS+Orion only to be unable to land on the moon without SS, when SS doesn't need SLS or Orion?  SS can 100% do the job without SLS, but SLS cannot do anything outside of orbit the moon.  

Elon has stated several times that the only reasons Space X exists is to make humans multiplanetary.  SS is designed to go to Mars from the get-go.  Yes, there are technology hurdles that will have to be conquered before humans can land on Mars with SS, but we are getting there quickly.  

Earth to Mars has a transit window every two years.  I believe that this year was the last window, the next won't be until 2024.  A lot of people believe that Elon will at the very least have SS operational enough to fly one to Mars unmanned, loaded with supplies.  Which leaves 2026 as the earliest a SS can make the trip to Mars manned.  It may not happen until 2028, or possibly even 2030.  

Either way it's a lot of excitement and will be a good thing for the US of A.  



It's weird to me that a lot of thing have been happening with regards to space, but very few people realize it.  Most don't even know that that US added another branch to the military (Trump did something right) called the USSF, or United States Space Force.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18252 on: July 23, 2022, 12:02:18 PM »
Utee, I'm sure your friend at NASA believes in what they are doing....
He designs elements for the ISS, I think he's fine with what they're doing.

Gigem

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2144
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18253 on: July 23, 2022, 12:54:37 PM »
I really don’t keep up with the iss comings and going’s. Are they planning on adding new modules?  Because I thought it was mostly complete and now just maintaining what they’ve got. Some of which are 20 plus years old. 

There is a lot of chatter about Russia breaking out and the US needing to replace some of the functionality of the Russian modules such as the ability to reboost. 

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17718
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18254 on: July 23, 2022, 01:03:20 PM »
Don't know about new modules, but they're always innovating and replacing current on-board components with new and improved ones.

With the global tensions with Russia, it wouldn't surprise me if they pull out (or are kicked out) of the ISS program, and then as you say, new modules and/or new functionality could become necessary.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71627
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #18255 on: July 23, 2022, 01:39:35 PM »
The ISS is not long for this world, metaphorically speaking.

Long ago, there was a proposal to build an electric launch system in the Andes that would propel something to about 3,000 mph up to 17,000 feet, then rockets would boost the rest of the way.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.