Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

so if you dont want to read my opinion then just bugger off and do whatever it is you do when your not on here pissing me off

Did you copy/paste this from the reply to your strongly-worded letter to the Superman writers?

Fro believes in 138 genders, so from his vantage point anyone that deviates even slightly from the most rigid, islamic gender roles imaginable is part of the LGBT community.

Tell me more about what I believe!  You love to do so, despite never actually being correct.  

Why do you only go to the extremes?  

Yeah, he's a slave to the CBS sitcoms, canned laughter and all.  Lazy, safe "entertainment" that confirms his bias.

Interesting considering none of them are sitcoms

What bias do these shows indicate

Not sure what you mean by lazy safe and I doubt you do either

Interesting considering none of them are sitcoms

What bias do these shows indicate

Not sure what you mean by lazy safe and I doubt you do either

Let's just say the easiest people to pander to worship our traditional institutions...

Nor should you.  

I wasn't aware they were running any companies.
Careful, your post echoes what's been said of the Jews by.....the most evil people our country ever fought.

dude...wtf are you even talking about?

And I was saying that the people running those companies in general- were just pandering to the public. Trying to get good PR for their shitty corporations and make their corporations look enlightened, woke, tolerant, and preaching "acceptance for all people", etc.. It's just PR bullshit- kind of like when Raytheon hypes all their LGBTQ+ bullshit- so free and tolerant and acceptance here!- you're the best- help us build more and more DRONE BOMBS LGBTQ+2AAASDXE PEEPS TO DROP ON POOR GOAT HERDERS IN MIDDLE EAST & PAKISTAN! YAAAAY ACCEPTANCE!

Also, it's just marketing by being transgressive. You, my friend, would not have thought a lick about Superman unless something happened to it that felt transgressive. Basically, the only reason you're thinking about it at all is because the decision bothers a certain part of your outlook.

What strikes me as odd is that, in 2021, this isn't really even transgressive. Even the folks on this thread complaining about it aren't really particularly worked up, nor are those who are defending it. It strikes me as play-acting... Just going through the motions because it's "newsworthy". 

It's kinda like the movie Brokeback Mountain. In 2005, a movie about two secretly gay cowboys trying to come to terms with themselves in the middle of a hyper-masculinized environment was transgressive. In 2021, a movie about two gay cowboys would be a buddy comedy or a rom-com. 

You want transgressive? Do this in 1987, in the middle of the AIDS crisis. Make Christopher Reeves kiss a dude on the big screen.

THAT would have been transgressive. This is milquetoast.