Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/15/judge-rules-secretary-state-bensons-ballot-signature-verification-guidance-invalid/4699927001/?utm_source=detroitnews-Daily%20Briefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily_briefing&utm_term=hero

I find this extremely interesting. State constitution changed in 24 states, which requires a vote of the people but happened without one.
 

The article doesn't say the state constitution was changed. It says the Administrative Procedures Act was not followed. Which doesn't seem great. (Out of curiosity, I couldn't find the 24 state thing. Would be interested to read about it)

In a larger sense, it is a sort of wild system. It assumes handwriting is an identifiable trait, and that these random bureaucrats will have a clue in matching them. Imagine the legal battles, ballot by ballot, digging through and matching signature by signature. 

One side wants fewer legal citizens to vote under the guise of "voter fraud."  That's all there is to see here.  

how in the world did you get video of utee at work

Ha that was pretty much everyone when the Technology was being introduced to the offices and work place

One side wants fewer legal citizens to vote under the guise of "voter fraud."  That's all there is to see here. 

I want every single person who is allowed to vote, and wants to vote - to be able to and do so easily-I do want them identified.  You know- how people get identified for virtually everything of substance they do in day to day life. 

it is not a credible argument to say we should not ensure their identity before people vote. Even someone who says they believe that- doesn’t. 

I want every single person who is allowed to vote, and wants to vote - to be able to and do so easily-I do want them identified.  You know- how people get identified for virtually everything of substance they do in day to day life.

it is not a credible argument to say we should not ensure their identity before people vote. Even someone who says they believe that- doesn’t.

Exactly this.

I want every single person who is allowed to vote, and wants to vote - to be able to and do so easily-I do want them identified.  You know- how people get identified for virtually everything of substance they do in day to day life.

it is not a credible argument to say we should not ensure their identity before people vote. Even someone who says they believe that- doesn’t.

Is it credible to acknowledge an extremely tight process of ensuring might likely be used to prevent people who would like to vote and are allowed to vote from voting? Just that it would be a pretty real possible externality. 

I don't have a great answer, but it certianly strikes me as a possible mechanism for chicanery, as unfortunately do the alternatives.  

(This spins back a bit toward that felon voting/court fees thing, which I listened to part of a podcast on. Less about the voting part, more about how the court fees were not really court fees as much as a back door to taxes, which was interesting)