header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal

 (Read 3947 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37607
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #84 on: October 29, 2021, 10:36:19 PM »
much more important than that!
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11247
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #85 on: October 29, 2021, 11:39:48 PM »
I think that the dueling factions in this thread should settle it via massive brawl. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

um1963

  • Recruit
  • **
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 68
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #86 on: October 30, 2021, 12:24:35 AM »
I think that the dueling factions in this thread should settle it via massive brawl.
Haha, Well my side would win because we'd bring the best fighters.  The other faction will form a distinguished, non partisan, diverse committee to make up some rules to be all inclusive and not hurt the feelings of weaker guys up for consideration.  Half their group will be pansies as a result.  Afterwards they'll say things like, "we gave it 110%", "it was a competitive loss" and "we showed a lot of courage today".

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12224
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #87 on: October 30, 2021, 12:54:48 AM »
Haha, Well my side would win because we'd bring the best fighters.  The other faction will form a distinguished, non partisan, diverse committee to make up some rules to be all inclusive and not hurt the feelings of weaker guys up for consideration.  Half their group will be pansies as a result.  Afterwards they'll say things like, "we gave it 110%", "it was a competitive loss" and "we showed a lot of courage today".
It's easy to win on paper and then argue the other side shouldn't even be allowed in the ring because you've already won on paper.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25281
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #88 on: October 30, 2021, 08:47:48 AM »
But we only watch because the players on the field are competing at 110%, balls-to-the-wall.  If we get too cutesy with how we determine who the best is, you wind up with a bunch of non-scholarship 5'8" white kids trying really hard.
Why the hell you picking on me?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18899
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #89 on: October 30, 2021, 09:12:56 AM »
Because I'm a 5'9" white kid, lol.  Probably the shortest left tackle in FL 5A HS football at the time, lol.  But I was great at pass pro.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25281
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #90 on: October 30, 2021, 09:14:30 AM »
LT at 5-9? Jeez.

I played ILB at 5-8 160.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

um1963

  • Recruit
  • **
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 68
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #91 on: October 30, 2021, 09:54:06 AM »
It's easy to win on paper and then argue the other side shouldn't even be allowed in the ring because you've already won on paper.
The past 10 years of college football would like to have a word with you.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18899
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #92 on: October 30, 2021, 03:46:53 PM »
LT at 5-9? Jeez.

I played ILB at 5-8 160.
I was 230.  The rest of our OL was 6'2-6'4, 220-250.  I had fun shutting down those gangly high school DEs.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37607
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #93 on: October 31, 2021, 08:43:09 PM »
May be an image of text that says 'CFB 2021 WHERE DOES SPENCER RATTLER PLAY NEXT SEASON? NFL EV NFL ASU 160 Miss OLE MISS +400 SOONERS G GEORGIA EVEN even=BE $100, WIN $100 +500 7 SportsLine'
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37607
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #94 on: October 31, 2021, 08:43:31 PM »
I'm hoping  - Nebraska!
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18899
  • Liked:
Re: G5 Scheduling Alliance Proposal
« Reply #95 on: October 31, 2021, 09:55:39 PM »
NO ONE is going to be headed to Tempe, AZ when sanctions come down.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.