I think most Purdue fans recognized that the 2017 team was ahead of schedule, namely because for all of his faults, Darell Hazell did leave a number of very good senior defensive players. That a half step backwards while the program took a full step forwards was maybe a necessary part of the process in 2018. But even with that a big home opener against a Northwestern team with quarterback health issues, followed by perennial FBS doormat Eastern Michigan meant that maybe there was still the chance to build some early momentum. Hell, in my game by game preseason picks, I had Purdue sitting at 5-1, ranked in the top 25 with a potential Gameday hosting of Ohio State on October 20. Instead the Boilermakers find themselves needing to pull a home upset this week just to avoid 0-3. Not to mention next week they host what appears to be a very good 3-0 Boston College team, followed by a trip to Lincoln. You want to test how fragile a rebuild is? Throw 0-5 at them and see what happens. That's putting all of the carts before the horse though. As tough as 0-2 is, they aren't that far from being 2-0. Given the competition, that's not saying much, that they COULD be 2-0, but it is what it is. Part of a rebuild is changing systems and overhauling the roster, and another part is overhauling the mindset. That's what has cost Purdue, with two incredibly stupid personal foul penalties that cost them a chance to win against Northwestern, and would have nearly sealed the win against Eastern Michigan. The next step for Brohm & Co. is to clean that up. The margin in West Lafayette is too thin to be making those kinds of mental mistakes. Last year Purdue announced they were going to be solid with a convincing win on the road at Missouri. They did it with stifling defense, holding the Tigers to just 3 points. It would take a monumental overhaul from what Purdue has looked like defensively to repeat that performance. Pretty much since that game, Drew Lock has been as good as any quarterback in the SEC. He's second in the league in passing right now, averaging 344 ypg, and his favorite target, Emanuel Hall, is 2nd in the nation, averaging 171 receiving yards per game. Purdue thus far, has the worst defense in the Big Ten, giving up 408 ypg. They've accomplished that while playing Eastern Michigan, with a brand new quarterback, and a Northwestern team that just put up 7 points on Duke. Missouri might be the best offense Purdue will face all season outside of the Dwayne Haskins machine. So how can they slow down the nation's second most prolific pass-catch connection, with a secondary giving up a Big Ten worst 8.2 ypa? I don't know, but the front is getting enough pressure, the secondary is simply struggling in coverage. Purdue needs to ride what should still be a solid home field crowd. They were electric in the opener, and I don't think 0-2, considering where they've been recently, is enough to fully deflate them. It's an SEC team coming in for a night game. Should be good. Then they need to control the clock. I know Brohm wants to pass, and the quarterback play should be a strength. But right now, the fewer possessions the better, and the running game is simply ahead of the passing game right now. The Boilermakers are passing it third most in the league, despite having the second worst yards per attempt; while running it the least (33.5 apg) despite having the best ypc in the conference (8.1). I know he's trying to shape this team to fit his identity, but the fact is right now, that is a recipe for 0-3. I think with that home crowd, and IF the coaches are willing to commit more to the run, Purdue can pull this upset. But I'm concerned they are too stubborn to do so, and I still don't see how this Purdue secondary does much to slow down Lock. |