header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: CFP Thread

 (Read 2484 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23615
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #322 on: December 20, 2025, 10:11:32 PM »
This is what I've been talking about.

Is a seat at the table worth the public flogging?  Is the added exposure worth being so exposed as to not belonging?

Tulane, JMU, Boise last year - they should be competing for their own NC, not THE NC.  There is a nice grey area between Ohio State-Georgia and Montana-Montana State...fill it.  Have competitive games vs schools on equal footing and have an opportunity at a NC. 

For the love of logic. 
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 51620
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #323 on: December 20, 2025, 11:35:38 PM »
Is a seat at the table worth the public flogging?  Is the added exposure worth being so exposed as to not belonging?
yes, obviously yes, the seat at the table is worth $$$$$
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23615
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #324 on: Today at 12:48:15 AM »
yes, obviously yes, the seat at the table is worth $$$$$
There's a word for that, and it ain't capitalism.  It starts with an M and ends with -ism.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #325 on: Today at 01:59:24 AM »
James Madison certainly more competitive than Tennessee was last year. 

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4652
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #326 on: Today at 06:49:39 AM »
I am somewhat reluctant to keep any G5 team out of the playoffs just for being G5, but this whole Tulane- OM game was a complete farce. For one, OM ALREADY beat the shit out of them earlier this season. If you’re going to hold Texas accountable for losing to Florida, you have to hold Tulane accountable to the same standard. I’m not even sure how Tulane even got in, I guess it’s some sort of AQ for G5 teams?  

Now I’m not naive enough to believe that just because a team blows the other one out in one game that the 2nd game will be similar. Heck, we’ve got multiple examples of that NOT being true this season. OU/Bama, and UGA-Bama both had different outcomes.  I just think that any G5 game vs P4 teams should be heavily weighted. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 34598
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #327 on: Today at 08:04:42 AM »
It's tough to say
We need to be done with G5 charity.

It's like Mercedes-Benz says:

The best, or nothing.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13475
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #328 on: Today at 08:07:50 AM »
I am somewhat reluctant to keep any G5 team out of the playoffs just for being G5, but this whole Tulane- OM game was a complete farce. For one, OM ALREADY beat the shit out of them earlier this season. If you’re going to hold Texas accountable for losing to Florida, you have to hold Tulane accountable to the same standard. I’m not even sure how Tulane even got in, I guess it’s some sort of AQ for G5 teams? 
.
Yeah, they take the top 5 conference champions, which is supposed to be the P4 +1 G5. 

Duke won the ACC, and lost to Tulane H-H, so Tulane got their spot. 

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 51620
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #329 on: Today at 08:20:48 AM »
I am somewhat reluctant to keep any G5 team out of the playoffs just for being G5, but this whole Tulane- OM game was a complete farce. For one, OM ALREADY beat the shit out of them earlier this season. If you’re going to hold Texas accountable for losing to Florida, you have to hold Tulane accountable to the same standard. I’m not even sure how Tulane even got in, I guess it’s some sort of AQ for G5 teams? 

Now I’m not naive enough to believe that just because a team blows the other one out in one game that the 2nd game will be similar. Heck, we’ve got multiple examples of that NOT being true this season. OU/Bama, and UGA-Bama both had different outcomes.  I just think that any G5 game vs P4 teams should be heavily weighted.
I blame Bama
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 22420
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #330 on: Today at 08:27:48 AM »
So the tide is due for an "L" that makes me happy 
"It is better to have died a young boy than to fumble the football" - John Heisman

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #331 on: Today at 08:54:04 AM »
We need to be done with G5 charity.

It's like Mercedes-Benz says:

The best, or nothing.
No way. Winners win. Losers say we need to change the system.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 34598
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #332 on: Today at 08:55:08 AM »
No way. Winners win. Losers say we need to change the system.
Says losers JMU and Tulane.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #333 on: Today at 08:57:26 AM »
Says losers JMU and Tulane.
I think they were happy. JMU was more competitive than Tennessee and Oregon and SMU last year. If the poindexters paid attention they would have flip flopped JMU and Tulane. But they don't, which is why you should not let the poindexters keep taking everything over. 

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #334 on: Today at 08:59:59 AM »
JMU put up over 500 yards and 30 points in Autzen. I would have liked to see how they did against a more inept team like Oklahoma. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 34598
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #335 on: Today at 09:01:28 AM »
They are not in the same class.

Why pretend they are?

JMU would finish dead last in the SEC or B1G.

Tulane lost to Ole Miss twice this year, to the tune of 86-20.

Enough with the charity already.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.