header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: CFB Realignment

 (Read 9822 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
CFB Realignment
« on: September 10, 2021, 04:45:07 PM »
Another one.

Big 12 adds UCF, BYU, Cincy and Houston.

Now they are talking about Memphis and Boise.

Interesting, for sure.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2021, 04:47:39 PM »
That's twice now since 2000 that Cincinnati has joined a big boy league without OSU keeping them down.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2021, 05:00:30 PM »
The map is interesting.

U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12206
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2021, 05:13:40 PM »
That's twice now since 2000 that Cincinnati has joined a big boy league without OSU keeping them down.
Check your premises, BB...

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2021, 05:13:46 PM »
The geography is tailor made for the pod system. 


  • South: Texas Tech, TCU, Baylor, Houston
  • North: OSU2, Kansas, KSU, ISU
  • East: W Virginia, Cincinnati, UCF, Memphis
  • West: BYU, Boise, SDSU?, UNLV? 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2021, 05:22:31 PM »
Getting into Cali would be beneficial for them.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37556
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2021, 05:23:38 PM »
Fresno?

San Jose?
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25267
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2021, 05:24:49 PM »
That's twice now since 2000 that Cincinnati has joined a big boy league without OSU keeping them down.
The question becomes... will they get Pluto'd again?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2021, 05:34:59 PM »
I love it.

It's good for Ohio CFB. It's good for CFB in the MTZ.

As a Bearcat fan I followed the revamped Big East pretty closely, and this conference is way better than that. To drive this point home look no further than WV. They were the team to beat in the revamped Big East. The undisputed centerpiece. Now, they just blend right into the pack.

In the revamped Big East Rutgers with Ray Rice was the only other old guard to make any noise. Pitt and Syracuse were both horrible. It was the noobs that really kept it afloat beyond WV. Louisville, Cincinnati, USF and even UConn were all playing about the best FB that they'd ever played.

This is going to be a fun league. Coast to coast. Recruiting tentacles in Florida, Ohio, and all throughout Texas. It will be fun to see which teams emerge as the teams to beat. Don't count out the Big 12 just yet.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2021, 11:53:36 PM »
The map is interesting.


That Provo dot is way off, btw. 

Provo is on I-15 up near Salt Lake. 

That dot is on I-70.
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

ohio1317

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2021, 12:38:17 AM »
I think the the hope might be by the time they come divisional rules are deregulated.  Seems to be some push for that and I doubt we make it to the an expanded CFP without it (conferences will want their 2 best teams in championship to maximize chance one of them gets bye).  Not sure it will happen before then though even if it happens.

I think those teams set-up best for a kind of PAC-12ish set-up.  Divide the Texas schools, but have them play each other annually locked (like California schools in PAC-12).  Then divide up by older and newer.  It preserves most rivalries and every much play game that I can see.  

Division 1:
Iowa State
Kansas State
Kansas
Oklahoma State
Baylor
Texas Tech

Division 2:
BYU
Cincinnati
UCF
West Virginia 
Houston
TCU

ohio1317

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2021, 12:40:57 AM »
There is also some reporting that there is at least some wanting to go up a bit more once Texas and Oklahoma leave.  I think the money might work better with 12 than 14, but if 14 does work better, my guess would be Memphis and Boise with some consideration to South Florida and Colorado State.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11239
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2021, 12:41:46 AM »
I think the the hope might be by the time they come divisional rules are deregulated.  Seems to be some push for that and I doubt we make it to the an expanded CFP without it (conferences will want their 2 best teams in championship to maximize chance one of them gets bye).  Not sure it will happen before then though even if it happens.

I think those teams set-up best for a kind of PAC-12ish set-up.  Divide the Texas schools, but have them play each other annually locked (like California schools in PAC-12).  Then divide up by older and newer.  It preserves most rivalries and every much play game that I can see. 

Division 1:
Iowa State
Kansas State
Kansas
Oklahoma State
Baylor
Texas Tech

Division 2:
BYU
Cincinnati
UCF
West Virginia
Houston
TCU


The Noobs and The Rubes? 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18864
  • Liked:
Re: CFB Realignment
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2021, 12:49:21 AM »
They could add whoever they want, but it doesn't matter.  They're 2nd-tier.  Yawn.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.