header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Bowling For Burgers

 (Read 41251 times)

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17172
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #826 on: January 01, 2020, 01:42:51 PM »
Ya if M can keep within one score that's a moral victory,gotta hang onto that
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7868
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #827 on: January 01, 2020, 01:44:02 PM »
Oh weird. I just let a little 'yes' slip out under my breath when TTUN scored. I think it's more hating 'bama than liking their opponent, or conference pride, etc.
You should take something for that.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71650
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #828 on: January 01, 2020, 01:44:28 PM »
They have run the ball on Bama this far.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7868
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #829 on: January 01, 2020, 01:52:25 PM »
So I was thinking about the whole, didn't care aspect of bowl upsets. When there's reporting behind it, it makes sense, but it's often just a rorschach test. Something surprises, we read into it reasons that go beyond, "That other team might be good" and "CFB is random."

So today, lets look at the games. Who has the most "not into it factor":
-Michigan had a way disappointing year, but Bama was closer to a playoff spot. I guess Bama, though it seems even.
-Minnesota was a game from a division title. Auburn was out of it much earlier. Minnesota has the edge, Thus Auburn win gets the Minnesota "did't have the energy because it was playing for something bigger."
-Rose Bowl: Oregon was one dumb upset away from being the first team left out of the playoff, a mighty honor. I'll say UW is unfortunately in the no-win situation of this excuse-making process, but a UW fan wouldn't care as Rose Bowl
-Baylor was one win from the playoff. Georgia was probably also, but in a much sadder way. Give this to Baylor since they had a chance. When UGA wins, the Bears just couldn't get up for it as they'd played much more meaningful games.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6052
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #830 on: January 01, 2020, 01:57:30 PM »
Yep. And they call it "Coke" when they order it.
Now it sounds like you're talking about Texans, at least from what I remember of the rambles of Hooky/CharleyHorse.
Play Like a Champion Today

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5513
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #831 on: January 01, 2020, 02:00:46 PM »
Nice acrobatics. 

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6052
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #832 on: January 01, 2020, 02:01:59 PM »
This is true hereabouts.  "Coke" means soft drink.  Rum and coke could be rum and Canada Dry.
Don't the folks "thereabouts" call it "Co-Cola"?  They did when/where I lived in Alabama 50 years ago.
Play Like a Champion Today

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5513
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #833 on: January 01, 2020, 02:10:44 PM »
ESPN lost a paddle on that commercial break.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6052
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #834 on: January 01, 2020, 02:14:37 PM »
We were talking earlier about inconsistencies in rules, and one that I really don't like, is spiking the ball to stop the clock.

Under normal circumstances, throwing the ball directly into the ground, while in the pocket, not passing the ball past the LOS, and with no receivers in sight, is flagged for Intentional Grounding.  Why should it be different all of a sudden when a team wants to stop the clock?  Shouldn't they still be penalized? 

My position is, sure, you can stop the clock if you don't have any timeouts, but you still have to take the penalty yardage along with the loss of down.
Doesn't intentional grounding also include "in order to avoid a sack"?
Play Like a Champion Today

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18904
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #835 on: January 01, 2020, 02:17:09 PM »
Don't the folks "thereabouts" call it "Co-Cola"?  They did when/where I lived in Alabama 50 years ago.
My grandparents did, from east rural GA.  Always thought it was funny.  
Also, still never got a solid reply on why people put peanuts in their 'Co-Cola'.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6052
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #836 on: January 01, 2020, 02:18:10 PM »
It does?  I don't see that in the wording for the NCAA rule, although all I could find was this verbage and description.

https://www.ruletool.info/ncaa-rule-7-snapping-and-passing-the-ball/3/

I
t does say things like "to preserve yardage" and additional rules if it's done "to preserve time" but the specific exception is made for the immediate spike.

And I'm saying I don't like that exception.  Why does it exist?  It just adds another line item to an already too complex rulebook.

If you want to save time outs and still stop the clock, then you can take the penalty for grounding. Obviously just my opinion, I simply don't see a need to make a distinction in cases and treat them differently.
The "to preserve yardage" part means the same thing as "to avoid a sack."
Play Like a Champion Today

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18904
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #837 on: January 01, 2020, 02:20:05 PM »
I attended that 1988 Hall of Fame Bowl - Bama vs UM.  I kept the program for a long time.  Cheered for Alabama back then, and their good RB, Bobby Humphrey.

I drew a lot back then, so liked the animated mascots.  Never found it odd back then, but looking at it now, why a pink elephant?  Weird.

Image result for 1988 hall of fame bowl program
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13109
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #838 on: January 01, 2020, 02:25:09 PM »
Wtf? Michigan boned on a truly terrible roughing the passer called that should have been called intentional grounding. 

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5513
  • Liked:
Re: Bowling For Burgers
« Reply #839 on: January 01, 2020, 02:25:16 PM »
Maybe he's tanning in Tampa?

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.