header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Better job?

 (Read 6690 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45742
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #42 on: May 28, 2021, 01:37:49 PM »
unfortunately, I got to see what Mike Riley could do with better talent and resources
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #43 on: May 28, 2021, 01:41:41 PM »
The Miss State offense have UGA's defense fits last year.  I had to admire the style of it.  Given a very accurate QB and some quick wide outs, I think they could score on just about anyone.

I think I'd defend it by having my three down DLs just occupy space and try to swat the ball while dropping 8 in short coverage.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22325
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #44 on: May 28, 2021, 02:27:16 PM »
The Miss State offense have UGA's defense fits last year.  I had to admire the style of it.  Given a very accurate QB and some quick wide outs, I think they could score on just about anyone.

I think I'd defend it by having my three down DLs just occupy space and try to swat the ball while dropping 8 in short coverage.
I think that in a couple of years, when the Pirate has recruited to his system, they're going to be a tough out for just about every team they play, except maybe Alabama based on sheer talent.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #45 on: May 28, 2021, 02:52:08 PM »
As noted,  they may well lose games they should win while doing the reverse also.  It's a neat offense, I think, but one can have a bad game with it.


bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9368
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #46 on: May 28, 2021, 03:55:58 PM »
One coach is more than many programs have had.
This is true, but if you are in theory that level of program and all but a couple of coaches struggle to bring the floor up, perhaps there is some thing understated about the job that makes it harder than we think

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #47 on: May 28, 2021, 04:01:16 PM »
Maybe what makes it harder is expectations that are too lofty.  Even very good programs struggle to win NCs these days, Clemson and Bama have shown it can be done with remarkable regularity, but no one else has come close to that.  But Texas SHOULD be able to make a major bowl game most years and win 10+ games with few exceptions.

Texas SHOULD be in the playoff twice a decade, I'd think, at least, but one might say that for USC and Florida and Michigan  ...

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9368
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #48 on: May 28, 2021, 04:08:03 PM »
Maybe, but we've never seen what Leach can do at a team with elite talent.



That's true, and we likely never will.

But, we've seen him lose a lot with better teams. Pretty consistently. And that kind of thing matters less when you're the plucky underdog, but it matters a hell of a lot more when you're at a powerhouse.

(Tennessee could've settled this for all of us, but they decided to be dummies and hire Pruitt)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21839
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #49 on: May 28, 2021, 05:38:51 PM »
Even with 4 playoff teams per season, there's still not enough spots for every helmet program to get their 2-3 appearances per decade.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #50 on: May 28, 2021, 05:44:02 PM »
If we have say 8 Blue Bloods, obviously they could all participate in four years twice in theory.

If we have say 16 programs with realistic chances to make a playoff, it gets dicier obviously, but all 16 COULD do it in four years of course, in theory.

The problem of course is one can pencil in Clemson Bama Ohio State in most years and the other 11 are vying for slot 4 often as not.

As we have noted, ten years ago Clemson/Bama were not dominant, and they may not be in five more years.  Ohio State seems position to make the playoffs more than ha;f the time, it would appear.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22878
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #51 on: May 28, 2021, 05:58:29 PM »
Even with 4 playoff teams per season, there's still not enough spots for every helmet program to get their 2-3 appearances per decade. 
I'm mobile, so I can't look it up. But without getting too deep into who should have gone, and just going with who the AP top four going into the bowls were. How many playoff appearances would each of the helmet schools have had in the seventies, which I think we all agree is the most helmety decade

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #52 on: May 28, 2021, 06:07:38 PM »
Of course, these rankings were prebowl for much of this period, I will include prebowl rankings when not:

1960 Final AP Football Poll

[th]Rank[/th]
[th]Team (FPV)[/th]
[th]Conf[/th]
[th]Rec[/th]
[th]Pts[/th]
[th]Last Week[/th]
1< 1Minnesota (17.5)Big Ten8-1433.5DNP (Did not play)
2< 3Mississippi (16)SEC (Southeastern)9-0-1411 
3< 2Iowa (12.5)Big Ten8-1407.5 
4< 7NavyInd (Independent)8-1262 

Some heavy hitters in that group.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #53 on: May 28, 2021, 06:08:32 PM »
1961 Final AP Football Poll

[th]Rank[/th]
[th]Team (FPV)[/th]
[th]Conf[/th]
[th]Rec[/th]
[th]Pts[/th]
[th]Last Week[/th]
1< 1Alabama (26)SEC (Southeastern)10-0452W 34-0 N Auburn
2< 2Ohio State (20)Big Ten8-0-1436 
3< 4TexasSouthwest9-1348 
4< 3LSU (1)SEC (Southeastern)9-1335 

Heh, starts to look like today.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #54 on: May 28, 2021, 06:09:04 PM »
1962 Final AP Football Poll

[th]Rank[/th]
[th]Team (FPV)[/th]
[th]Conf[/th]
[th]Rec[/th]
[th]Pts[/th]
[th]Last Week[/th]
1< 1USC (42)AAWU (Athletic Association of Western Universities)10-0509W 25-0 H Notre Dame
2< 2Wisconsin (5)Big Ten8-1428 
3< 3Mississippi (2)SEC (Southeastern)9-0393 
4< 4TexasSouthwest9-0-1343 


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83277
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Better job?
« Reply #55 on: May 28, 2021, 06:09:33 PM »
1963 Final AP Football Poll

[th]Rank[/th]
[th]Team (FPV)[/th]
[th]Conf[/th]
[th]Rec[/th]
[th]Pts[/th]
[th]Last Week[/th]
1< 1Texas (34)Southwest10-0460DNP (Did not play)
2< 2Navy (10)Ind (Independent)9-1418 
3< 3IllinoisBig Ten7-1-1361 
4< 4Pittsburgh (5)Ind (Independent)9-1340 


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.