header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread

 (Read 15789 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31107
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #127 on: August 02, 2024, 12:19:37 PM »
Yes, 7 too many.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22232
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #128 on: August 02, 2024, 12:25:48 PM »
8 too many

Big Ten

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31107
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #129 on: August 02, 2024, 12:30:54 PM »
I was good with this logo and 11 teams. Fantastic logo.

U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22232
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #130 on: August 02, 2024, 12:53:38 PM »
I was good with this logo and 11 teams. Fantastic logo.



Stupid logo and it sucks.

Much better:



utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22232
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #131 on: August 02, 2024, 12:56:14 PM »




847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31107
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #132 on: August 02, 2024, 01:01:21 PM »
Opinions are like ...

11 was great. 10 game round robin with 3 OOC games and no CCG. 

Wonderful is what that would be.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22232
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #133 on: August 02, 2024, 01:02:23 PM »
Crap is what that would be.

Big Ten was great as it was.  Adding PSU was the beginning of the end.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31107
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #134 on: August 02, 2024, 01:08:38 PM »
Adding PSU didn't hurt any other conference, unlike adding Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska and the PAC's Big 4.

Big difference there, in my opinion.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22232
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #135 on: August 02, 2024, 01:12:29 PM »
Adding PSU didn't hurt any other conference, unlike adding Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska and the PAC's Big 4.

Big difference there, in my opinion.
It started the escalations.  Beginning of the end.  Screw the Big 11.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31107
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #136 on: August 02, 2024, 01:13:09 PM »
It started the escalations.  Beginning of the end.  Screw the Big 11.
I wish they would have taken Texas when they had the chance. So there!
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22232
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #137 on: August 02, 2024, 01:16:23 PM »
I wish they would have taken Texas when they had the chance. So there!
Well that would be fine, obviously. :)


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31107
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #138 on: August 02, 2024, 01:24:38 PM »
That probably would have ended the madness right then and there. Texas would have a stable home, and not look elsewhere ever again.

The XII could have survived by adding TCU. The PAC could have taken Utah and BYU.

SEC was already at 12 and the ACC could have gotten there by adding 3 more. Say Miami, Pitt and VT.

Would suck for the other former Big East schools, but they could have figured out a way. And they should STILL be kicking themselves for not listening to PSU about starting an Eastern conference.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22875
  • Liked:
Re: B1G New Additions Offseason Thread
« Reply #139 on: August 02, 2024, 01:35:27 PM »
If you are going to blame the Big Ten for anything, it's not adding PSU, it's creating the BTN.  That turned conferences into nothing more than TV markets, which threw geography out the window.

The SWC dissolving was happening anyway.  The ACC absorbing the Big East was probably inevitable.  But I think beyond that, look to the success of the BTN.  And damn, I miss the early days of that network.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.