header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
Author

Topic: B1G 2024 and beyond

 (Read 1946 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: B1G 2024 and beyond
« Reply #28 on: November 27, 2023, 11:36:55 AM »
If the B1G had wanted Kansas they'd have taken them years ago.

The only schools I see still being of any potential value to the B1G or SEC are FSU, Miami, Duke, UNC, and UVA.  And the cases for the last few are not overly compelling.
Logged

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: B1G 2024 and beyond
« Reply #29 on: November 27, 2023, 12:02:34 PM »
I think ND is the only one left that would bring more TV revenue than it would take
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: B1G 2024 and beyond
« Reply #30 on: November 27, 2023, 12:05:12 PM »
Quote from: utee94 on November 27, 2023, 11:36:55 AM
If the B1G had wanted Kansas they'd have taken them years ago.

The only schools I see still being of any potential value to the B1G or SEC are FSU, Miami, Duke, UNC, and UVA.  And the cases for the last few are not overly compelling.
Clemson is a take for the SEC. NCSU and VT bring something. 
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: B1G 2024 and beyond
« Reply #31 on: November 27, 2023, 12:21:55 PM »
Quote from: 847badgerfan on November 27, 2023, 12:05:12 PM
Clemson is a take for the SEC. NCSU and VT bring something.
Nah, SEC doesn't need Clemson.  South Carolina and the rest of the South are already solidly owned by the SEC, there's no advantage and really only risk associated with adding them.  Plus, I don't think the SEC can handle yet another team named the Tigers.
Logged

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: B1G 2024 and beyond
« Reply #32 on: December 05, 2023, 05:14:15 PM »
NCAA President Charlie Baker calls for new tier of Division I where schools can pay athletes, and Nebraska’s Trev Alberts expresses his support.

https://apnews.com/article/ncaa-baker-nil-c26542c528df277385fea7167026dbe6

LAS VEGAS (AP) — NCAA President Charlie Baker is asking members to make one of the most dramatic shifts in the history of college sports by allowing highly resourced schools to pay some of their athletes.

In a letter sent to more than 350 Division I schools Tuesday, Baker said he wants the association to create a new tier of NCAA Division I sports where schools would be required to offer at least half their athletes a payment of at least $30,000 per year through a trust fund.

Baker also proposed allowing all Division I schools to offer unlimited educational benefits and enter into name, image and likeness licensing deals with athletes.
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
Smokeys Record Year Hoodie

FAFO No Trespassing Sign