The other thing about that is this:
-the question is being asked if the arch rival hired a private investigation, firm to catch you cheating, because they couldn’t beat you
-the question everyone else is asking is, did Michigan start cheating because they couldn’t beat their arch rival
now when you look at the evidence that actually exists, including the performance against the rival before, and after the cheating, the performance against the spread before, and after the cheating, clearly one of those questions has strong evidence to support it, while the other is purely, made up with not 1 ounce of evidence to support it