Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

See post below- Which I sent before you even posed this question but clearly answers the question.

We have already discussed this but to rehash, like you I was hopeful that his election, being an outsider and not a career politician, would have some positives to it. The liberals in the media began their attacks long before he took office. It’s a 24 seven attack cycle and has been every single day of his presidency. They cannot acknowledge A single positive thing that he has accomplished, which in my view there are quite a few. No political figure in modern history has had as much of the media against him working diligently to undermine him since before he took office and then this poor guy has. And while you guys will try to deny that I firmly believe you’re being dishonest and you all know that. There really is no disputing it.

after I voted for Obama, and he and that entire party turned me off to such a high degree, this despicable treatment from the media has just made me sicker by the day. 
It’s not that you criticize him correctly, which you do but seriously how can I take anything you guys say seriously when you’re trying to blame him for things that clearly could or should be blamed on the left?

To Trump, The media are attack dogs and have been since day one.  To Biden, they are lapdogs. They won’t ask him any questions and when they do their huge fat softballs. 

it is clear to me and many many many others that the liberal playbook is to do bad things and then try to paint a picture that he is the cause of those things. Over and over and over.


Was it you that said you’re surprised he has so much support?  Stop and take a look at what the “other side “is offering?  It’s all one great big huge turn off. 

if Trump wasn’t such a dick, or if he was just half as much of a dick as he is, I would definitely be voting for him just to stop the left agenda which I just hate.  But I have to look in the mirror and I know I can’t do that if I vote for him and I definitely can’t do that if I vote for the “other side“
it will be interesting to me when he’s out of office next year how much of things that might not go well or go wrong the Democrats will still be trying to blame on him. I’m going to guess it will go on for years.

When the other side "speaks for those people" in an obvious attempt to win their votes, we call it "pandering."
I don't see that Trump is doing anything different than that.
To the extent that he's been political, he was a lifelong centrist Democrat, perhaps because it would not have helped him to be a Republican in New York.  He was friends with the Clintons.
When it was obvious that he had no career as a Democrat on the national stage, he switched and used the GOP instead.
He doesn't care about those little people whose voice has been ignored any more than any demagogue cares about the people to whom he appeals.  Those people are just means to an end, like people in the military are and Big Ten football fans are.  He doesn't care about them.  He cares about himself.
If he were on the other "side," Republicans would be calling him out every day, just as they did with Obama, who was not as obvious a demagogue as Trump is.

The RNC is powerless and the DNC only slightly less so.  They are empty shells, used by demagogues to label themselves in order to lend credence to their drive for the White House.

I love to see dems cry in the beer

have another on me

He has zero interest in reality.  He paints any dissenting voice as a caricature of something he saw on Fox News. 

Trump was the people's primary voters' choice, not the RNC's.  The RNC just caved in and let him take the nomination by being the bigger, badder demagogue.
You've got a better case for Bernie, but even without the Super-Delegates (appointed by the DNC), Hillary had the necessary delegates sewed up before the DNC convention even began.  The fact that a non-Democrat like Bernie got as close as he did in 2016 supports my point better than yours, I think.  He didn't even get close this year, so he wasn't "bitten," and it wasn't because of anything the DNC did.

The superdelegates thing, I think, has been fixed.  I guess then they were counted beforehand or early on and now they're not?  I'm only partial on that, and you may know better than I.

But as you acknowledge the RNC caved, the DNC didn't.  And I don't think there's any way they would have, either.  I'm still stunned, to this day, that the RNC just let decent, quality candidates fall by the wayside.