header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: 2018 OT Tourney (1st Round) - Narrower Hashmarks vs. Relaxed Pass Blocking Rules

 (Read 1669 times)

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20437
  • Liked:
SYSTEMIC CHANGES
End of TV monopoly
Recruiting coverage
SYSTEM RULE CHANGES
Academic ineligibility
GAME RULE CHANGES
OT
GAME PLAY CHANGES
Wishbone

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13189
  • Liked:
Uhhhhh.....neither?  I love the wide hash marks.  And I hate any rule change that aids the passing game.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20437
  • Liked:
Damn, it I typed up a long response, and then it didn't post.  Short answer, I agree with Sam.  These are probably the two rule changes that most aided opening up offenses, but the hashmarks at least also helps the running game, particularly the jet sweeps that MSU adopted very effectively last year.  I do miss the WLB/SLB distinctions mattering so much.  I did enjoy the strategy in the more traditional or wishbone options of running it behind your better blockers towards the shortside of the field, or going wideside but behind your worse blockers.  So, I'd prefer eliminating both rule changes, but of the two, I'd rather go back to actually calling holding on pass plays.  At least they started calling ineligible man downfield on RPOs last year.

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5541
  • Liked:
The hashmark rule did two things, among others .  I felt it hampered triple option offenses a bit and it made field goal kicking more accurate.  Of course it aided other offenses.

Entropy

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1435
  • Liked:
I'd like both gone...

GopherRock

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2458
  • Liked:
Where were CFB hash marks before? At the HS width? And when were they moved in? They've been at 40' as long as I've been paying attention. 

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20437
  • Liked:
Where were CFB hash marks before? At the HS width? And when were they moved in? They've been at 40' as long as I've been paying attention.
They moved each in about 7 feet in 1993

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38252
  • Liked:
 The college football standard, which was the previous standard in the NFL (1945–1971), is 40 feet apart, (20 yards from the sidelines) introduced in 1993.

 Previously, the college width was the same as the high school standard, at one-third of the width of the field (531⁄3 feet).
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.