header pic

The SEC Forum at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Week 7 "Power" Rankings of Malaise and Sighing

 (Read 7750 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: Week 7 "Power" Rankings of Malaise and Sighing
« Reply #42 on: October 21, 2017, 05:10:16 PM »
Uhhh, they better be picking the 4 best teams, that's their job.  And no, 'best' doesn't just mean talent, it means team quality + resume.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

AUauditor86

  • Walk On
  • *
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 19
  • Liked:
Re: Week 7 "Power" Rankings of Malaise and Sighing
« Reply #43 on: October 23, 2017, 07:36:11 AM »
Here is the other side of the Auburn play-calling argument from a very good Auburn source (not me):

 
· Four offensive possessions into the LSU game, Auburn was up 20-0 with 232-yards in the book. Where did it go south?
· On the opening possession Auburn attempted passes on their first two 1st down plays of the game. From that point, Auburn would try only three more first down passes the remainder of the game.
· By possession four, Auburn attempted a first down pass to begin the possession. From that point, Auburn would call 17 consecutive run plays, which did not stop until after LSU took their initial lead of the game.
* With the threat of a passing game, Auburn averaged 5.2 yards per rush during the first-half. During the second-half, Auburn averaged 3.4 yards per rush, when it was more than obvious Auburn intended to run on every first down snap. Gus Malzahn admitted during his post-game press conference, LSU was rolling up a safety to stop the run during the second-half, yet allowed the continuation of all runs on first down. What happened to the philosophy of taking what the opponent gives you?
· Gus Malzahn said it himself during his post-game press conference. "We couldn’t hang on, and the punt return really broke our back,” he said of D.J. Chark’s 75-yard touchdown play in the fourth quarter. “We were in pretty good shape up until that point.” After building a 20-0 lead, Malzahn was content with watching the lead evaporate to 23-14 at halftime.
· Coming into the LSU game, Auburn had averaged 142.2 yards passing on first down during their previous four games. This included an average of 17.8 yards per attempt on first down and 19.6 yards per attempt. Not only was Auburn throwing more on first down, but they were also throwing vertically and having great success. This all changed against LSU when Auburn attempted five passes on first down for 10-yards.
· Auburn threw the ball deep against LSU, more so than any other game this season. The problem was the majority of the deep throws came on third down when LSU was expecting the pass. During the previous four games, Auburn was throwing deep on early downs when the defense was anticipating the run.
· What we witnessed in the passing game against LSU was nowhere close to what Auburn had accomplished during the proceeding four games. It appeared Gus Malzahn was content with the 17-0 lead and would rely heavily on the running game on early downs, sprinkled in with a few deep shots downfield on obvious passing downs.
· Jarrett Stidham started off on what looked to be a career outing, completing 6 of 8 passes for 146-yards and 1 TD. Once the offense went into a shell, Stidham completed only 3 of his next 18 passes for 19-yards.
· What happened Saturday in Baton-Rouge was mind-boggling, to say the least. Auburn's offensive staff elected to go away from what had been so successful during the four previous games. Compounding the problem was that Auburn had enormous success during the first quarter of the LSU game. It wasn't like the offense laid an egg from the opening kickoff. The Auburn offense had LSU on the brink of quitting, but the coaches decided to coast after building a 17-0 lead. It was a decision that cost Auburn the victory and could be even more detrimental down the road for those involved.


 

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2990
  • Liked:
Re: Week 7 "Power" Rankings of Malaise and Sighing
« Reply #44 on: October 23, 2017, 01:01:48 PM »
Well, that's certainly a very...Auburn perspective.  I'd define it more as LSU made adjustments (you just said so yourself) and AU failed to adapt adequately.  I would not characterize it as you said, that AU had LSU ready to quit, and neither did AU decide to pack it in early, for all the reasons I outlined above.  Out of all the things you can say about LSU in the first quarter, at least I can say that unlike earlier in the season (MSU), they never quit.  

I think people tend to only look at their team and what they did and didn't do and it never truly registers that the other team has coaches and players too, and they have some say in the matter.  One thing you'll notice if you watch LSU--maybe any team, I dunno--the opposing WRs may have some success early, but when the LSU secondary figures out what the plan for the day is, you start seeing much tighter coverage.  We saw it again vs. Ole Miss, and we saw it last week vs. Auburn.  

The biggest thing I wonder about Auburn's decisions in the second half is why they got away from Kerryon Johnson trying the wide runs.  It worked in the first half, and indeed it was the only thing that worked for AU in the 2nd quarter.  LSU never really stopped it, AU just quit showing it.  

I can't believe we're still talking about this over a week later.  Both teams have played an entire other game by now.  

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2990
  • Liked:
Re: Week 7 "Power" Rankings of Malaise and Sighing
« Reply #45 on: October 23, 2017, 01:02:35 PM »
just did a quick glance at the top 15-20 or so in pbu on cfbstats.com. osu and lsu have both had 11 pbu games, and usf and au, of all teams, have had 12 pbu games. there was only a couple of 10's too, but can't remember them.
This year?  

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2990
  • Liked:
Re: Week 7 "Power" Rankings of Malaise and Sighing
« Reply #46 on: October 23, 2017, 01:05:20 PM »
I'm not even going to ask who might reach out and stun Bama with a win.  Who might give them a game?  What did A&M do to stay close?  Can anyone else mimic that?  Is it just Auburn, case closed?
Did A&M really stay close?  I'm actually asking, because I watched only the first 3 quarters of that game (or close to that), and Alabama was up by around 3ish TDs.  I didn't get to finish it, but I do know the final score was close, and I assumed it was garbage time TDs from A&M.  

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.