I missed most of the second half, but from talking to folks who watched it, sounds like LSU just quit on the coach. Do you think he's on the hot seat now?
Obviously your question was answered, but getting to the first part that preceded it: I'm not so sure about that. It looked like every other game lately that LSU played against a ranked opponent with a winning record. This exact same thing happened vs. A&M last year, in fact. LSU played well in the first half and even carried a lead into halftime, then got their doors blown off in the second half. I haven't noticed anything that made me think they quit. Just seriously out-coached, and mentally not very tough. They don't have the aggression to play with a team like A&M.
What I notice is the DC is phenomenal against QBs who are either pocket passers or runners who aren't that good at throwing, but he just can't get his guys to stay disciplined enough against a true dual-threat, and if such a QB gets hot, our defense becomes extremely exploitable. And he really, really, really badly misuses one of the key players who is great at one thing, by making him try to be an every-down LB, which he just isn't. That is a bigger deal than most casual eyes will ever see, I reckon. Trying to force Harold Perkins to be on the field at all times because in the right situation he's basically the college Micah Parsons, is very misguided, because on an every-down basis, Perk is neither a true ILB nor a STAR position player. It's sad to say, but the defense actually gets better in standard downs without him on the field. But Blake Baker can't help but try to force the issue, and it has lead to
so many bad defensive plays. I know all DC's and defenses have their hands more full with a true dual-threat QB, but I've seen many of our defenses neutralize them far better than this version does, so I know it can be done, and how it's done. It starts with gap discipline, and this team doesn't have it, and your ILB better be pretty decent covering middle crossing routes.
Offensively, the OT's got blistered by A&M's great edge rush guy, but that's nothing new. They have a tr. fr. at LT and a RS. fr. at RT and it just hasn't worked this year. Also, the OC bizarrely won't stick to anything that appears to be working. He's kinda Sarky in that way. Berry ran the ball for like 5.5 ypc in the first half, so what does the OC do, starting the second half with a lead? Berry gets the carry on the first play, picks up 3 yards, he never touches the ball again the rest of the game. Granted, no offensive scheme or play-call looks good when your offensive line is a turnstile, but I've seen enough of this guy to know he shouldn't be an OC at this level. Kelly said all week leading up to the game they would have to commit a back or a TE to chip and help the OT's. They didn't. LSU continued to run plays out of empty sets while our tackles got Nuss killed again. I mean......they knew what they had to do....they
said it....and they didn't do it.
Also, A&M snowballed the game on us with special teams plays where LSU just derped and derped again. Overall, I wouldn't agree the team quit, I think A&M just kicked their ass. Like what happens to LSU in the second halves of many games in Kelly's tenure....A&M again, Florida State, Alabama, Ole Miss, Florida, Kentucky....I'm sure there's more. And, A&M is simply a better coached team, and that's what I saw, moreso than any quit in the team. I think they fought as hard as they could, as hard as they knew how. They just weren't prepared to do battle with this A&M squad.