Progressive Democratic Muslim wants to defund entire DHS....
header pic

College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!! The Best FREE College Football Forum on the Internet!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Progressive Democratic Muslim wants to defund entire DHS....

 (Read 222 times)

DunkingDan

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Posts: 7809
  • Liked:
Re: Progressive Democratic Muslim wants to defund entire DHS....
« Reply #30 on: February 11, 2019, 01:13:07 PM »
President Harry S. Truman said: “The fundamental basis of this nation’s laws was given to Moses on the Mount.  The fundamental basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings…  If we don't have the proper fundamental moral background, we will finally wind up with a totalitarian government which does not believe in rights for anybody except the state.”

HK_Vol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5375
  • Liked:
Re: Progressive Democratic Muslim wants to defund entire DHS....
« Reply #31 on: February 14, 2019, 01:55:08 AM »

HK_Vol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5375
  • Liked:
Re: Progressive Democratic Muslim wants to defund entire DHS....
« Reply #32 on: February 14, 2019, 02:16:48 AM »
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/321641/#respond

Chris Bray • 

Watching Ilhan Omar "question" Elliott Abrams this week, or watching Jerrold Nadler "question" Matthew Whitaker, I'm once again struck by how little members of Congress know. They look down and read, and if a witness says something like, "What do you mean by that?" they look around on their piece of paper for the thing they're supposed to read in response. Nadler read an obviously pre-written piece of paper from his staff saying that he was very disappointed by Whitaker's testimony. "I'm very disappointed by your lack of candor today," he says, in a statement written three days ago by a junior assistant. Congressional hearings are the least interesting, least valuable circus in the business of circuses.

This is why I like Jim Jordan so much. He knows the context, the premise, and the meaning of his questions. He LOOKS UP. If a witness says, "Why are you asking me that?" he knows why he's asking that.

I can't think of many others. They almost all just sit there and mouth the words their staff members typed for them. "Orange...man...bad...don't...you...[turns page] agree?"

For future discussion: the congressional habit of trying to force witnesses to answer "yes or no" to reductive or nonsensical questions. Congress was supposed to not be full of drooling idiots, wasn't it?

 

Amazon:
Support the Site:
Please Search Amazon from here!